Publication:
Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection: The sensitivities and specificities of microscopy, culture and PCR assay

dc.contributor.authorRadonjic, Ivana V. (6506464730)
dc.contributor.authorDzamic, Aleksandar M. (6507677143)
dc.contributor.authorMitrovic, Sanja M. (16029084500)
dc.contributor.authorArsic Arsenijevic, Valentina S. (6507940363)
dc.contributor.authorPopadic, Dusan M. (6602255798)
dc.contributor.authorKranjcic Zec, Ivana F. (6603218573)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T00:05:57Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T00:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare wet mount-, Giemsa stain-, acridine orange fluorescent stain-, cultivation- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches to establish which method or combination of methods was most effective in the laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Study design: Out of 200 investigated patients with various gynecological complaints, Trichomonas vaginalis infection was detected in 27 (13.5%) by any of methods investigated. Among women with trichomonads, a typical clinical finding was presented in only nine. For analysis of sensitivity and specificity of the methods used, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve concept with culture as a gold standard was applied. Results: Infection was diagnosed by wet mount in 14 (7.0%) women, by Giemsa stain in 11 (5.5%) and by acridine orange stain in 16 (8.0%) women. In 21 (10.5%) women, it was diagnosed by culture in Diamond's medium, and in 22 (11.0%) by PCR. For the initial diagnosis of trichomoniasis, wet preparation is the test that is widely available in most STD clinics, but its sensitivity is poor (66.67%). Giemsa stain shows a low sensitivity of 52.38%. Acridine orange shows reasonable sensitivity and specificity of 71.43% and 99.44%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR (80.95% and 97.21%) did not exceed that of culture. Conclusion: With regard to the fact that trichomoniasis can have an atypical or even asymptomatic course, in order to accurately diagnose this disease, microbiological investigation is necessary. Comparison of different methods showed that at least two techniques, such as culture and acridine orange staining, have the potential for better diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection. PCR detection of infection has been demonstrated to be highly specific and sensitive, but its availability and cost effectiveness are in question. PCR could provide an alternative for laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis by culture. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.033
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33646170447&doi=10.1016%2fj.ejogrb.2005.07.033&partnerID=40&md5=23eea7d0ffe7933ec2d65d7b525f6d22
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10863
dc.subjectAcridine orange
dc.subjectCulture
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectPCR
dc.subjectTrichomonas vaginalis
dc.titleDiagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection: The sensitivities and specificities of microscopy, culture and PCR assay
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files