Publication:
Validation of the MB-LATER score for prediction of late recurrence after catheter-ablation of atrial fibrillation

dc.contributor.authorPotpara, Tatjana S. (57216792589)
dc.contributor.authorMujovic, Nebojsa (16234090000)
dc.contributor.authorSivasambu, Bhradeev (55556106000)
dc.contributor.authorShantsila, Alena (35079373300)
dc.contributor.authorMarinkovic, Milan (56160715300)
dc.contributor.authorCalkins, Hugh (23473846800)
dc.contributor.authorSpragg, David (6505911626)
dc.contributor.authorLip, Gregory Y.H. (57216675273)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T15:21:59Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T15:21:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reliable identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients more likely to be AF-free long-term post-single catheter ablation (CA) would facilitate appropriate risk communication to patients. We validated the recently proposed MB-LATER score for prediction of late recurrences of AF (LRAF) post-CA. Methods: Patients who underwent CA for symptomatic AF refractory to ≥1 antiarrhythmic drugs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, between March 2003 and December 2015, for whom ≥1-year post-CA follow-up data were available, were enrolled. Results: Of 226 patients (median age 58.5 years [IQR: 52.0–65.0], 163 males [72.1%], 142 [62.8%] with paroxysmal AF), LRAF occurred in 133 patients (58.8%) during a median 2-year follow-up (IQR: 1.1–4.1). The mean MB-LATER score was significantly higher in patients with versus those without LRAF (2.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.002) and showed modest but significant predictive ability for LRAF (AUC: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.54–0.69], p = 0.003). A score cut-off value of >2 showed the best predictive ability for LRAF (70.4% [61.5–77.9]), with modest sensitivity (42.9% [34.3–51.7]) and specificity (74.2% [64.1–82.7]). Kaplan-Meyer survival free from AF was significantly better for patients with a MB-LATER score of ≤2 than for those with a score of >2 (log-rank p = 0.005). Conclusion: In our study, the MB-LATER score showed a significant but modest predictive ability for LRAF post-AF ablation. Further prospective validation is needed to better define the potential role of the MB-LATER score in patient selection and treatment decision-making post-AF ablation. © 2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051664815&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijcard.2018.08.018&partnerID=40&md5=a50a4a792847a64377be622a1ab303d3
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5675
dc.subjectAF recurrence post-ablation
dc.subjectCatheter-ablation of AF
dc.subjectMB-LATER score
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.titleValidation of the MB-LATER score for prediction of late recurrence after catheter-ablation of atrial fibrillation
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files