Publication:
Development of the Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28); refinement of the EORTC QLQ-MEL38 module

dc.contributor.authorWinstanley, Julie (35875266800)
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Edward (7401613169)
dc.contributor.authorSaw, Robyn (6602475899)
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Teresa (7403038158)
dc.contributor.authorBurmeister, Bryan (7004213379)
dc.contributor.authorNikolic, Dejan (7005493858)
dc.contributor.authorBusto-Cornide, Iria (57212170739)
dc.contributor.authorIglesias-Pena, Nicolás (57208689601)
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Frances (59369660400)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T14:34:41Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T14:34:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective: Few patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed that adequately measure the patient-experience following diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. Building on previous research, which developed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Module (QLQ-MEL38), the aim of this study was to further test the hypothesised domain structure and psychometric properties of the phase 3 module, in a new larger sample of melanoma patients. Methods: Melanoma patients (n = 270) were recruited from four countries (Australia, England, Serbia, and Spain). Patients completed the EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the QLQ-MEL38, and a sociodemographic survey. Using this new larger dataset, comparisons were made with the hypothesised domain structure of the EORTC phase 3 module using principal component analysis. Items which formed subscales in a revised domain structure were then tested for goodness of fit (GoF) to the Rasch model. Results: The original hypothesised and final domain structures were similar but not identical. Twenty-four items (83%) loaded onto the same distinct subscales previously generated by phase 3, and item-by-item comparison of the two pattern matrices indicated an extremely close match. Ten items were removed from the QLQ-MEL38 phase 3 module, and rescoring of some items was required. Four subscales, together with five individual items, comprised the final instrument. Conclusion: The newly developed measure (named the Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire; MCQ-28) was found to tap into several important psychosocial domains of concern to melanoma patients, particularly those being managed in “usual” clinic settings. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5251
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076088028&doi=10.1002%2fpon.5251&partnerID=40&md5=f90550922db90be98dce50f305c11d85
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5078
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectmelanoma
dc.subjectpsychometrics
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectreproducibility of results
dc.subjectsurveys and questionnaires
dc.titleDevelopment of the Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28); refinement of the EORTC QLQ-MEL38 module
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files