Publication:
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of propolis and N-acetylcysteine in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

dc.contributor.authorBuha, I. (44460972900)
dc.contributor.authorMirić, M. (57193772097)
dc.contributor.authorAgić, A. (57698117600)
dc.contributor.authorSimić, M. (55847076300)
dc.contributor.authorStjepanović, M. (55052044500)
dc.contributor.authorMilenković, B. (23005307400)
dc.contributor.authorNagorni-Obradović, L. (57189629141)
dc.contributor.authorŠkodrić-Trifunović, V. (23499690800)
dc.contributor.authorIlić, B. (56806538200)
dc.contributor.authorPopević, S. (54420874900)
dc.contributor.authorDimic-Janjic, S. (57208444020)
dc.contributor.authorIlić, A. (7004055911)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T13:02:20Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T13:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) accelerate the progressive impairment of lung function and general health. Together with maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and natural propolis have demonstrated pharmacological properties that address crucial pathophysiological processes underlying COPD and may prevent AECOPDs. This study aims at responding to dose-dependent efficacy and safety concerns regarding a propolis-NAC combination for the reduction of COPD exacerbation rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, phase IV trial with three treatment arms: Placebo and two active substance groups, one (AS-600) received 600 mg of NAC + 80 mg of propolis while the other (AS-1,200) received 1,200 mg of NAC + 160 mg of propolis. Following an AECOPD, frequent-exacerbation phenotype patients (n=46) were assigned a once-daily three-month therapy with the study drug and one year follow-up. The primary endpoint was the COPD exacerbation incidence rate during the follow-up period as a measure of dose-dependent efficacy of NAC-propolis combination compared to placebo. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the AECOPD incidence rate: 52.6% in patients that received placebo, 15.4% that received AS-600 and only 7.1% that received AS-1,200 (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.013). Compared to placebo, AECOPD frequency was significantly lower only in AS-1,200 (p=0.009). Compared to placebo, the relative risk for exacerbation was 0.29 in AS-600 and 0.13 in AS-1,200. No adverse events related to the treatment were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral combination of natural propolis with NAC confirmed formulation efficiency with a favorable safety profile. Our results need to be confirmed by larger clinical trials. © 2022 Verduci Editore s.r.l. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202207_29206
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134207957&doi=10.26355%2feurrev_202207_29206&partnerID=40&md5=320a0e7b8480960c7976d1c5ce15e378
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3765
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectDose-dependent
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectExacerbation
dc.subjectNAC
dc.subjectPropolis
dc.subjectSupplement
dc.titleA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of propolis and N-acetylcysteine in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files