Publication:
Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Subsequent Lines of Therapy for NSCLC Patients: Insights from Real-World Data

dc.contributor.authorKontić, Milica (43761339600)
dc.contributor.authorMarković, Filip (59002411800)
dc.contributor.authorNikolić, Nikola (58541091700)
dc.contributor.authorSamardžić, Natalija (56033770200)
dc.contributor.authorStojanović, Goran (57215183452)
dc.contributor.authorSimurdić, Petar (59188907700)
dc.contributor.authorPetkov, Svetlana (57754103000)
dc.contributor.authorBursać, Daliborka (16833694700)
dc.contributor.authorZarić, Bojan (16403676100)
dc.contributor.authorStjepanović, Mihailo (55052044500)
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T11:54:08Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T11:54:08Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. © 2024 by the authors.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213696
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85208559830&doi=10.3390%2fcancers16213696&partnerID=40&md5=50d71d3396cbf815f5c0f23878e223f4
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11538
dc.subjectadvanced non-small cell lung cancer
dc.subjectatezolizumab
dc.subjectimmune checkpoint inhibitors
dc.subjectnon-small cell lung cancer
dc.titleEfficacy of Atezolizumab in Subsequent Lines of Therapy for NSCLC Patients: Insights from Real-World Data
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files