Publication:
Manual versus target-controlled infusion of balanced propofol during diagnostic colonoscopy - A prospective randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorVučićević, Vera (55550927000)
dc.contributor.authorMilaković, Branko (15059321000)
dc.contributor.authorTešić, Milorad (36197477200)
dc.contributor.authorDjordjević, Jelena (57192095221)
dc.contributor.authorDjuranović, Srdjan (6506242160)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T19:03:00Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T19:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIntroduction There is an increasing interest in balanced propofol sedation (BPS) for colonoscopy in outpatient settings. Propofol is a potent anesthetic agent for this purpose and has a narrow therapeutic range, which increases a risk of cardiovascular and respiratory complications in case of improper administration. Objective The aim of this study was to compare patients’ safety and comfort of endoscopists in two methods of BPS targeting deep sedation - propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manual intravenous titration technique (MT) - during colonoscopy. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial included 90 patients (class I or II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists) deeply sedated with propofol, coadministered with small doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Propofol was given by MT technique (45 patients) or by TCI (45 patients). The following adverse effects were recorded: hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, bradypnea, apnea, hiccupping, and coughing, as well as endoscopist’s comfort during colonoscopy by means of a questionnaire. Results The MT group compared to the TCI group had a lower mean arterial pressure in the 10th minute after the beginning (p = 0.017), and at the end of colonoscopy (p = 0.006), higher oxygen saturation in the fifth minute (p = 0.033), and in the 15th minute (p = 0.008) after the beginning of colonoscopy, and lower heart rate at the beginning of the procedure (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events. Endoscopist’s comfort during colonoscopy was high 95.6% in the TCI group vs. 88.9% in the MT group (p = 0.069). Conclusion MT is clinically as stable as TCI of propofol for deep sedation during colonoscopy, and endoscopists experienced the same comfort during colonoscopy in both groups. Thus, both combinations are suitable for deep sedation during diagnostic colonoscopy. © 2016, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2298/SARH1610514V
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84997294934&doi=10.2298%2fSARH1610514V&partnerID=40&md5=81aa3436e5d51858d860422788de1bac
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7939
dc.subjectBalanced propofol sedation
dc.subjectColonoscopy
dc.subjectDeep sedation
dc.subjectEndoscopist’s comfort
dc.subjectTargetcontrolled infusion
dc.titleManual versus target-controlled infusion of balanced propofol during diagnostic colonoscopy - A prospective randomized controlled trial
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files