Publication: Stress echocardiography with smartphone: real-time remote reading for regional wall motion
dc.contributor.author | Scali, Maria Chiara (55929478400) | |
dc.contributor.author | de Azevedo Bellagamba, Clarissa Carmona (57194341124) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ciampi, Quirino (6602299243) | |
dc.contributor.author | Simova, Iana (23391267500) | |
dc.contributor.author | de Castro e Silva Pretto, José Luis (6508318426) | |
dc.contributor.author | Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana (57003143600) | |
dc.contributor.author | Dodi, Claudio (6602478787) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cortigiani, Lauro (55663049600) | |
dc.contributor.author | Zagatina, Angela (22939399700) | |
dc.contributor.author | Trambaiolo, Paolo (6602701604) | |
dc.contributor.author | Torres, Marco R. (7402581476) | |
dc.contributor.author | Citro, Rodolfo (15921921800) | |
dc.contributor.author | Colonna, Paolo (57221823607) | |
dc.contributor.author | Paterni, Marco (7003660393) | |
dc.contributor.author | Picano, Eugenio (7102408994) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T17:04:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T17:04:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.description.abstract | The diffusion of smart-phones offers access to the best remote expertise in stress echo (SE). To evaluate the reliability of SE based on smart-phone filming and reading. A set of 20 SE video-clips were read in random sequence with a multiple choice six-answer test by ten readers from five different countries (Italy, Brazil, Serbia, Bulgaria, Russia) of the “SE2020” study network. The gold standard to assess accuracy was a core-lab expert reader in agreement with angiographic verification (0 = wrong, 1 = right). The same set of 20 SE studies were read, in random order and >2 months apart, on desktop Workstation and via smartphones by ten remote readers. Image quality was graded from 1 = poor but readable, to 3 = excellent. Kappa (k) statistics was used to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement. The image quality was comparable in desktop workstation vs. smartphone (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7, p = NS). The average reading time per case was similar for desktop versus smartphone (90 ± 39 vs. 82 ± 54 s, p = NS). The overall diagnostic accuracy of the ten readers was similar for desktop workstation vs. smartphone (84 vs. 91%, p = NS). Intra-observer agreement (desktop vs. smartphone) was good (k = 0.81 ± 0.14). Inter-observer agreement was good and similar via desktop or smartphone (k = 0.69 vs. k = 0.72, p = NS). The diagnostic accuracy and consistency of SE reading among certified readers was high and similar via desktop workstation or via smartphone. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1167-2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019655870&doi=10.1007%2fs10554-017-1167-2&partnerID=40&md5=051bfb17c3fe0820cc11f16ef2a5fc7d | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6790 | |
dc.subject | Echocardiography | |
dc.subject | Stress echocardiography | |
dc.subject | Wall motion | |
dc.title | Stress echocardiography with smartphone: real-time remote reading for regional wall motion | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |