Publication: Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-STEMI Patients: The RIDDLE-NSTEMI Study
| dc.contributor.author | Milosevic, Aleksandra (56622640900) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic, Zorana (6602641182) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Milasinovic, Dejan (24823024500) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marinkovic, Jelena (7004611210) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vukcevic, Vladan (15741934700) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stefanovic, Branislav (57210079550) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Asanin, Milika (8603366900) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dikic, Miodrag (25959947200) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stankovic, Sanja (7005216636) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stankovic, Goran (59150945500) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T18:51:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T18:51:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of immediate versus delayed invasive intervention in patients with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Background Previous studies found conflicting results on the effects of earlier invasive intervention in a heterogeneous population of acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Methods We randomized 323 NSTEMI patients to an immediate-intervention group (<2 h after randomization, n = 162) and a delayed-intervention group (2 to 72 h, n = 161).The primary endpoint was the occurrence of death or new myocardial infarction (MI) at 30-day follow-up. Results Median time from randomization to angiography was 1.4 h and 61.0 h in the immediate-intervention group and the delayed-intervention group, respectively (p < 0.001). At 30 days, the primary endpoint was achieved less frequently in patients undergoing immediate intervention (4.3% vs. 13%, hazard ratio: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 0.74; p = 0.008). At 1 year, this difference persisted (6.8% in the immediate-intervention group vs. 18.8% in delayed-intervention group; hazard ratio: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.67; p = 0.002). The observed results were mainly attributable to the occurrence of new MI in the pre-catheterization period (0 deaths + 0 MIs in the immediate-intervention group vs. 1 death + 10 MIs in the delayed-intervention group). The rate of deaths, new MI, or recurrent ischemia was lower in the immediate-intervention group at both 30 days (6.8% vs. 26.7%; p < 0.001) and 1 year (15.4% vs. 33.1%; p < 0.001). Conclusions Immediate invasive strategy in NSTEMI patients is associated with lower rates of death or new MI compared with the delayed invasive strategy at early and midterm follow-up, mainly due to a decrease in the risk of new MI in the pre-catheterization period. (Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-STEMI Patients [RIDDLE-NSTEMI]; NCT02419833) © 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84953322789&doi=10.1016%2fj.jcin.2015.11.018&partnerID=40&md5=02299b64cd688906cae2df2384195380 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7812 | |
| dc.subject | delayed intervention | |
| dc.subject | immediate intervention | |
| dc.subject | NSTEMI | |
| dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.title | Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-STEMI Patients: The RIDDLE-NSTEMI Study | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
