Publication: FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction
| dc.contributor.author | Böhm, Felix (7007035623) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mogensen, Brynjölfur (7003995909) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Engstrøm, Thomas (7004069840) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stankovic, Goran (59150945500) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Srdanovic, Ilija (6506056556) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lønborg, Jacob (12240126300) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zwackman, Sammy (57222371591) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hamid, Mehmet (56624008800) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kellerth, Thomas (59852157900) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lauermann, Jörg (57195955901) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kajander, Olli A. (6603592918) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Andersson, Jonas (57614259700) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Linder, Rikard (7102201002) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Angerås, Oskar (55580696900) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Renlund, Henrik (36351070000) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ērglis, Andrejs (6602259794) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Menon, Madhav (57190861283) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schultz, Carl (7202476533) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Laine, Mika (55481374000) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Held, Claes (7005675618) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T11:47:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T11:47:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND The benefit of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease remains unclear. METHODS In this multinational, registry-based, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI or very-high-risk non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either FFR-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or no further revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The two key secondary outcomes were a composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS A total of 1542 patients underwent randomization, with 764 assigned to receive FFR-guided complete revascularization and 778 assigned to receive culprit-lesion-only PCI. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 4.3 to 5.2), a primary-outcome event had occurred in 145 patients (19.0%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 159 patients (20.4%) in the culprit-lesion-only group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.17; P=0.53). With respect to the secondary outcomes, no apparent between-group differences were observed in the composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.44) or unplanned revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04). There were no apparent between-group differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with STEMI or very-high-risk NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided complete revascularization was not shown to result in a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only PCI at 4.8 years. Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314149 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85191616798&doi=10.1056%2fNEJMoa2314149&partnerID=40&md5=c1efd43ccce9c5625ce272a71a316331 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1219 | |
| dc.title | FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
