Publication:
Non-Invasive 3D Breast Tumor Localization: A Viable Alternative to Invasive Tumor Marking

dc.contributor.authorBjelica, Dragana (58516544800)
dc.contributor.authorColakovic, Natasa (56598042100)
dc.contributor.authorOpric, Svetlana (23980996100)
dc.contributor.authorZdravkovic, Darko (23501022600)
dc.contributor.authorLoboda, Barbara (57514761500)
dc.contributor.authorPetricevic, Simona (57193679705)
dc.contributor.authorGojgic, Milan (58517177900)
dc.contributor.authorZecic, Ognjen (58516752800)
dc.contributor.authorSkuric, Zlatko (56597874500)
dc.contributor.authorZecic, Katarina (58516544900)
dc.contributor.authorIvanovic, Nebojsa (23097433900)
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T11:54:49Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T11:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: We present a detailed description and the preliminary results of our original technique for non-invasive three-dimensional tumor localization in the breast, which was created as an alternative to standard invasive tumor marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), aiming to enable adequate surgery after complete tumor regression. Methods: A detailed description of the technique is provided in the main text. The technique’s feasibility and precision were assessed in a single-arm, prospective study based on the histological parameters of the adequacy and rationality of the excision of completely regressed tumor beds. Results: Out of 94 recruited patients, 15 (16%) were deemed unsuitable, mainly due to the tumors’ inadequate ultrasound visibility. Among the 79 processed patients, 31 (39%) had complete clinical regression after NAST and were operated on using our technique. The histological parameters of surgical precision (signs of tumor regression: 24/31; microscopic cancer residues: 7/31) were verified in all excised specimens (100% precision). There were no positive margins in seven cases with microscopic residues, indicating our technique’s capacity to enable oncologically safe post-NAST surgery. Conclusions: The proposed technique is feasible and satisfactorily accurate in determining the location of regressed tumors, thus representing an alternative to invasive tumor marking, especially in surgical centers lacking trained staff and equipment for invasive marking. The technique’s limitations are mainly related to the inadequate ultrasound visibility of the tumor. © 2024 by the authors.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142564
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85199659860&doi=10.3390%2fcancers16142564&partnerID=40&md5=a69bca7bf71a0cd27fbced9296db789c
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11622
dc.subjectearly breast cancer
dc.subjectmarking techniques
dc.subjectneoadjuvant systemic therapy
dc.subjectpathological complete response
dc.subjectsurgical excision
dc.subjecttumor positioning
dc.subjectultrasound
dc.titleNon-Invasive 3D Breast Tumor Localization: A Viable Alternative to Invasive Tumor Marking
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files