Publication: Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: Arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims
| dc.contributor.author | Dotlic, Jelena (6504769174) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stojkovic, Vida Jeremic (59454751400) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cummins, Paul (55845596700) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Milic, Marija (57202972248) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gazibara, Tatjana (36494484100) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T13:44:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T13:44:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Financial reimbursements after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine have been criticized in the literature. This strategy has been described as payment to receive the vaccines, undue inducement, and unethical. We are aware that healthcare workers who work in primary healthcare, prevention, and public health may encounter similar reasons from people who refuse vaccination against COVID-19. For this reason, we are compelled to clarify these claims and provide arguments for all healthcare workers who might be challenged by such reasoning. In this critical review, we discuss why the claims against financial incentives that have been presented in the literature are erroneous. © 2021 Epidemiology and Health. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021081 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123025244&doi=10.4178%2fepih.e2021081&partnerID=40&md5=384f108a513ec8a2030d994e46dddb13 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4413 | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
| dc.subject | Financial support | |
| dc.subject | Reimbursement | |
| dc.subject | Vaccination | |
| dc.title | Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: Arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |