Publication:
Left atrial appendage closure-indications, techniques, and outcomes: Results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey

dc.contributor.authorPison, Laurent (26642819800)
dc.contributor.authorPotpara, Tatjana S. (57216792589)
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jian (15769086600)
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Torben B. (7202517549)
dc.contributor.authorGrazia Bongiorni, Maria (7003657780)
dc.contributor.authorBlomström-Lundqvist, Carina (55941853900)
dc.contributor.authorProclemer, Alessandro (7003317073)
dc.contributor.authorDagres, Nikolaos (7003639393)
dc.contributor.authorEstner, Heidi (6506978495)
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Madrid, Antonio (57208118344)
dc.contributor.authorHocini, Mélèze (7005495090)
dc.contributor.authorSciaraffia, Elena (26039371800)
dc.contributor.authorTodd, Derick (7201388337)
dc.contributor.authorSavelieva, Irene (6701768664)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T19:39:23Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T19:39:23Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this EP Wire was to assess the indications, techniques, and outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in Europe. Thirty-three European centres, all members of the European Heart Rhythm Association electrophysiology (EP) research network, responded to this survey by completing the questionnaire. The major indication for LAAO (94%) was the prevention of stroke in patients at high thrombo-embolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) and contraindications to oral anticoagulants (OACs). Twenty-one (64%) of the responding centres perform LAAO in their own institution and 80% implanted 30 or less LAAO devices in 2014. Two-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography was the preferred imaging technique to visualize LAA before, during, and after LAAO in 79, 58, and 62% of the participating centres, respectively. Following LAAO, 49% of the centres prescribe vitamin K antagonists or novel OACs. Twenty-five per cent of the centres combine LAAO with pulmonary vein isolation. The periprocedural complications included death (range, 0-3%), ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke (0-25%), tamponade (0-25%), and device embolization (0-20%). In conclusion, this EP Wire has demonstrated that LAAO is most commonly employed in patients at high thrombo-embolic risk in whom OAC is contraindicated. The technique is not yet very widespread and the complication rates remain significant. © 2015 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv069
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84926635204&doi=10.1093%2feuropace%2feuv069&partnerID=40&md5=d433a5a99170b6cd67868825d9fcdef3
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8254
dc.subjectAnticoagulation
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillation
dc.subjectEHRA survey
dc.subjectEP wire
dc.subjectLeft atrial appendage
dc.subjectOccluder
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectStroke
dc.titleLeft atrial appendage closure-indications, techniques, and outcomes: Results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files