Publication:
Biomarker counseling, disclosure of diagnosis and follow-up in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A European Alzheimer's disease consortium survey

dc.contributor.authorFrederiksen, Kristian S. (39261216900)
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Thomas R. (36114937100)
dc.contributor.authorAppollonio, Ildebrando (8309607400)
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Birgitte Bo (57191431118)
dc.contributor.authorRiverol, Mario (24462200800)
dc.contributor.authorBoada, Mercè (57192408353)
dc.contributor.authorCeccaldi, Mathieu (7003354968)
dc.contributor.authorDubois, Bruno (7101841106)
dc.contributor.authorEngelborghs, Sebastiaan (7004850774)
dc.contributor.authorFrölich, Lutz (56820309600)
dc.contributor.authorHausner, Lucrezia (55695799800)
dc.contributor.authorGabelle, Audrey (23984716300)
dc.contributor.authorGabryelewicz, Tomasz (55939789200)
dc.contributor.authorGrimmer, Timo (6507487659)
dc.contributor.authorHanseeuw, Bernard (35114773100)
dc.contributor.authorHort, Jakub (15020481600)
dc.contributor.authorHugon, Jacques (7103202992)
dc.contributor.authorJelic, Vesna (55880151900)
dc.contributor.authorKoivisto, Anne (57210906244)
dc.contributor.authorKramberger, Milica G. (36544238400)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T13:43:23Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T13:43:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline, partly depending on demographics and biomarker status. The aim of the present study was to survey the clinical practices of physicians in terms of biomarker counseling, management, and follow-up in European expert centers diagnosing patients with MCI. Methods: An online email survey was distributed to physicians affiliated with European Alzheimer's disease Consortium centers (Northern Europe: 10 centers; Eastern and Central Europe: 9 centers; and Southern Europe: 15 centers) with questions on attitudes toward biomarkers and biomarker counseling in MCI and dementia. This included postbiomarker counseling and the process of diagnostic disclosure of MCI, as well as treatment and follow-up in MCI. Results: The response rate for the survey was 80.9% (34 of 42 centers) across 20 countries. A large majority of physicians had access to biomarkers and found them useful. Pre- and postbiomarker counseling varied across centers, as did practices for referral to support groups and advice on preventive strategies. Less than half reported discussing driving and advance care planning with patients with MCI. Conclusions: The variability in clinical practices across centers calls for better biomarker counseling and better training to improve communication skills. Future initiatives should address the importance of communicating preventive strategies and advance planning. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5427
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090978657&doi=10.1002%2fgps.5427&partnerID=40&md5=91bb002cc243374dd673e72203942c29
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4387
dc.subjectAlzheimer's disease
dc.subjectbiomarker counseling
dc.subjectbiomarkers
dc.subjectdementia
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjectdiagnostic disclosure
dc.subjectmild cognitive impairment
dc.subjectsurvey
dc.titleBiomarker counseling, disclosure of diagnosis and follow-up in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A European Alzheimer's disease consortium survey
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files