Publication:
Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin Versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies

dc.contributor.authorDunjic, Momir (24449089100)
dc.contributor.authorTurini, Stefano (57204169360)
dc.contributor.authorNejkovic, Lazar (55566568600)
dc.contributor.authorSulovic, Nenad (23499802400)
dc.contributor.authorCvetkovic, Sasa (40660903300)
dc.contributor.authorDunjic, Marija (23472894200)
dc.contributor.authorDunjic, Katarina (57209181612)
dc.contributor.authorDolovac, Dina (59388025900)
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T11:53:49Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T11:53:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of −6.9 kcal/mol and −6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from −4.5 to −5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein–protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around −976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein–protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications. © 2024 by the authors.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100661
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85207679003&doi=10.3390%2fcimb46100661&partnerID=40&md5=4bb274b9f1040e6d16e18790bd304ba4
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11479
dc.subjectapigenin
dc.subjectAPOBEC
dc.subjecthigh-performance computing (HPC)
dc.subjectHPV-16
dc.subjectluteolin
dc.subjectmolecular docking
dc.subjectoncoprotein E6
dc.subjectpRb
dc.subjectprotein–protein interaction
dc.subjectTP-53
dc.titleComparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin Versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files