Publication: Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin Versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies
| dc.contributor.author | Dunjic, Momir (24449089100) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Turini, Stefano (57204169360) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nejkovic, Lazar (55566568600) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sulovic, Nenad (23499802400) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cvetkovic, Sasa (40660903300) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dunjic, Marija (23472894200) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dunjic, Katarina (57209181612) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dolovac, Dina (59388025900) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-02T11:53:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-02T11:53:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of −6.9 kcal/mol and −6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from −4.5 to −5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein–protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around −976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein–protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications. © 2024 by the authors. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100661 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85207679003&doi=10.3390%2fcimb46100661&partnerID=40&md5=4bb274b9f1040e6d16e18790bd304ba4 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11479 | |
| dc.subject | apigenin | |
| dc.subject | APOBEC | |
| dc.subject | high-performance computing (HPC) | |
| dc.subject | HPV-16 | |
| dc.subject | luteolin | |
| dc.subject | molecular docking | |
| dc.subject | oncoprotein E6 | |
| dc.subject | pRb | |
| dc.subject | protein–protein interaction | |
| dc.subject | TP-53 | |
| dc.title | Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin Versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
