Publication: Clinical outcomes following different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
| dc.contributor.author | Bujak, Kamil (56054292200) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Verardi, Filippo Maria (57211340181) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arevalos, Victor (57217146053) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gabani, Rami (57226428159) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spione, Francesco (57212222622) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rajwa, Pawel (57190014696) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Milasinovic, Dejan (24823024500) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stankovic, Goran (59150945500) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gasior, Mariusz (7005055488) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sabaté, Manel (57193753144) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brugaletta, Salvatore (14010425300) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T12:07:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T12:07:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Controversy still exists regarding the optimal treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Aims: We aimed to analyse the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare outcomes following different bifurcation stenting techniques. Methods: We systematically searched for RCTs comparing different techniques published up to July 2022. We then conducted a pairwise meta-analysis to compare outcomes between provisional stenting (PS) versus upfront 2-stent techniques. Moreover, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare all strategies with each other. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: Twenty-four RCTs (6,890 patients) analysed PS, T-stenting, double-kissing (DK)-crush, crush, or culotte stenting. The pairwise meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the PS and 2-stent techniques. However, the prespecified sensitivity analysis, which included RCTs exclusively enrolling patients with true bifurcation lesions, showed a lower rate of MACE following 2-stent techniques, and meta-regression indicated that a longer side branch lesion was associated with a greater benefit from the 2-stent strategy, which was the most apparent in RCTs with a mean lesion length >11 mm. NMA revealed that DK-crush was associated with the lowest MACE rate (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.62; p<0.01; PS as a reference). Conclusions: Overall, 2-stent techniques were not significantly better than PS in terms of clinical outcomes. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that there might be a benefit of a 2-stent approach in selected patients with true bifurcation lesions, especially in the case of long side branch lesions. An NMA revealed that DK-crush was associated with the lowest event rates when compared with other techniques. © 2023 University of Punjab (new Campus). All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00013 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173445160&doi=10.4244%2fEIJ-D-23-00013&partnerID=40&md5=6cde9d7cd3d5489ea190aba0073fd45c | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2526 | |
| dc.subject | disease | |
| dc.subject | • bifurcation | |
| dc.subject | • left main | |
| dc.subject | • miscellaneous | |
| dc.subject | •drug-eluting stent | |
| dc.subject | •multiple vessel | |
| dc.title | Clinical outcomes following different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
