Publication:
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus and Tick-Borne Diseases within Professionally Tick-Exposed Persons, Health Care Workers, and General Population in Serbia: A Questionnaire-Based Study

dc.contributor.authorVasić, Ana (56973990300)
dc.contributor.authorBjekić, Jovana (55545983600)
dc.contributor.authorVeinović, Gorana (55548844800)
dc.contributor.authorMihaljica, Darko (55220180900)
dc.contributor.authorSukara, Ratko (56201927300)
dc.contributor.authorPoluga, Jasmina (6507116358)
dc.contributor.authorFilipović, Saša R. (35576652900)
dc.contributor.authorTomanović, Snežana (8667628500)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T13:02:10Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T13:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) among different groups of people in Serbia. Professionally tick-exposed persons (PTEPs), health care workers (HCWs), and the general population (GP) were subjected to an anonymous, voluntary, online questionnaire using Microsoft Forms. A total of 663 questionnaire responses were collected (February–March 2021), while 642 were included in the analysis. The significant difference in knowledge in TBDs existed between GP and PTEPs, and HCWs (p < 0.001). The perception of risk-to-tick exposure and TBDs was generally high (42.4 (95% CI: 33.6–51.2) within GP, 44.9 (95% CI: 35.8–53.9) within PTEPs and 46.2 (95% CI: 38.0–54.5) within HCWs), while fear was low (13.7 (95% CI: 7.9–19.5) within GP, 12.6 (95% CI: 7.3–19.9) within PTEPs, and 13.5 (95% CI: 7.4–19.5) within HCWs). Protective practices differed across groups (F (2639) = 12.920, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.039), with both PTEPs (t = 3.621, Cohen d = 0.332, p < 0.001) and HCWs (t = 4.644, Cohen d = 0.468, p < 0.001) adhering to more protective practices than the GP, without differences between PTEPs and HCWs (t = 1.256, Cohen d = 0.137, p = 0.421). Further education about TBDs in Serbia is required and critical points were identified in this study. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020867
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122883062&doi=10.3390%2fijerph19020867&partnerID=40&md5=8e5e9d1aa1a095c4f1c17e37b7abea07
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3761
dc.subjectGeneral population
dc.subjectHealth care workers
dc.subjectProfessionally tick-exposed persons
dc.subjectSerbia
dc.subjectTick-borne diseases
dc.subjectTick-borne encephalitis virus
dc.titleKnowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus and Tick-Borne Diseases within Professionally Tick-Exposed Persons, Health Care Workers, and General Population in Serbia: A Questionnaire-Based Study
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files