Publication:
The predictive value of morphological findings in early diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities

dc.contributor.authorJakovic, Ljubomir (21742748500)
dc.contributor.authorBogdanovic, Andrija (6603686934)
dc.contributor.authorDjordjevic, Vesna (57215460423)
dc.contributor.authorDencic-Fekete, Marija (15836938800)
dc.contributor.authorKraguljac-Kurtovic, Nada (37037758700)
dc.contributor.authorKnezevic, Vesna (56806620700)
dc.contributor.authorTosic, Natasa (15729686900)
dc.contributor.authorPavlovic, Sonja (7006514877)
dc.contributor.authorTerzic, Tatjana (55916182400)
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T12:12:25Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T12:12:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study explores cytomorphologic features and their predictive role for early identification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with morphological distinctive recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities (RCA): t(15;17), t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16). We retrospectively evaluated 396 de novo AML cases, diagnosed and treated at single institution, between 2013-2017. Specific cytomorphologic features suggesting distinctive AML-RCA were revealed at diagnosis in 62 (15.65%) patients, including AML with t(15;17) in 41 (66.13%), t(8;21) in 13 (20.97%) and inv(16)/t(16;16) in 8 (12.90%). Final diagnoses of AML-RCA according to WHO integrated diagnostic criteria were established in 66 (16.66%) cases, including AML with t(15;17) 40 (60.60%), t(8;21) 17 (25.76%), and inv(16)/t(16;16) 9 (13.64%). Discordance between cytomorphological and other integrated criteria was detected as missed/wrong-call in 0/1 for t(15;17), 6/2 for t(8;21) and 2/1 for inv(16)/t(16;16). The cytomorphological accuracy was 97.56% (40/41) for t(15;17), 57.89% (11/19) for t(8;21) and 70% (7/10) for inv (16)/t(16;16). Positive/negative predictive values of cytomorphological evaluation were: 97.56%/100% for t(15;17); 84.62%/88.68% for t(8;21); 87.50%/96.65% for inv(16)/t(16;16). Sensitivity/specificity were: 100%/96.15% for t(15;17); 64.10%/95.92% for t(8;21); 77.78%/98.25% for inv(16)/t(16;16). We confirmed that morphology is still a highly relevant evaluation method in diagnosing several common AML-RCAs before completing cytogenetic and molecular studies, enabling early detection, particularly of AML with t(15;17). © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2018.10.017
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056468477&doi=10.1016%2fj.leukres.2018.10.017&partnerID=40&md5=df145d92639b44e00f8bcf71947fe689
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12839
dc.subjectAcute myeloid leukemia
dc.subjectCytomorphological characteristics
dc.subjectRecurrent cytogenetic abnormalities
dc.subjectWHO classification
dc.titleThe predictive value of morphological findings in early diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files