Publication:
Standardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement

dc.contributor.authorDevleesschauwer, Brecht (55175586600)
dc.contributor.authorCharalampous, Periklis (57226411746)
dc.contributor.authorGorasso, Vanessa (57204857488)
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Ricardo (56330129500)
dc.contributor.authorHilderink, Henk (6508145250)
dc.contributor.authorIdavain, Jane (55962569100)
dc.contributor.authorLesnik, Tina (57216981388)
dc.contributor.authorSantric-Milicevic, Milena (57209748201)
dc.contributor.authorPallari, Elena (57188667049)
dc.contributor.authorPires, Sara M. (26031106700)
dc.contributor.authorPlass, Dietrich (57217142114)
dc.contributor.authorWyper, Grant M. A. (56503829800)
dc.contributor.authorVon der Lippe, Elena (55756303500)
dc.contributor.authorHaagsma, Juanita A. (57202571125)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T11:39:40Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T11:39:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The burden of disease (BOD) approach, originating with the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study in the 1990s, has become a cornerstone for population health monitoring. Despite the widespread use of the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, variations in methodological approaches and reporting inconsistencies hinder comparability across studies. To tackle this issue, we set out to develop guidelines for reporting DALY calculation studies to improve the transparency and comparability of BOD estimates. Methods and Findings: The development of the STROBOD statement began within the European Burden of Disease Network, evolving from initial concepts discussed in workshops and training sessions focused on critical analysis of BOD studies. In 2021, a working group was formed to refine the preliminary version into the final Standardised Reporting of Burden of Disease studies (STROBOD) statement, consisting of 28 items structured across six main sections. These sections cover the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and open science, aiming to ensure transparency and standardization in reporting BOD studies. Notably, the methods section of the STROBOD checklist encompasses aspects such as study setting, data inputs and adjustments, DALY calculation methods, uncertainty analyses, and recommendations for reproducibility and transparency. A pilot phase was conducted to test the efficacy of the STROBOD statement, highlighting the importance of providing clear explanations and examples for each reporting item. Conclusions: The inaugural STROBOD statement offers a crucial framework for standardizing reporting in BOD research, with plans for ongoing evaluation and potential revisions based on user feedback. While the current version focuses on general BOD methodology, future iterations may include specialized checklists for distinct applications such as injury or risk factor estimation, reflecting the dynamic nature of this field. © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-024-00347-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85205802608&doi=10.1186%2fs12963-024-00347-9&partnerID=40&md5=33926174ef624e7d56d96749a8536fd6
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/828
dc.subjectBurden of disease
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectDisability-adjusted life years
dc.subjectEuropean burden of disease network
dc.subjectReporting guidelines
dc.titleStandardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files