Publication:
Comparison of preoperative evaluation with the pathological report in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A single-center experience

dc.contributor.authorDjordjevic, Vladimir (56019682600)
dc.contributor.authorGrubor, Nikica (6701410404)
dc.contributor.authorKovac, Jelena Djokic (52563972900)
dc.contributor.authorMicev, Marjan (7003864533)
dc.contributor.authorMilic, Natasa (7003460927)
dc.contributor.authorKnezevic, Djordje (23397393600)
dc.contributor.authorGregoric, Pavle (57189665832)
dc.contributor.authorLausevic, Zeljko (6603003365)
dc.contributor.authorKerkez, Mirko (22953482400)
dc.contributor.authorKnezevic, Srbislav (55393857000)
dc.contributor.authorRadenkovic, Dejan (6603592685)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T13:41:08Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T13:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe key to the successful management of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), among which intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the one with the highest risk of advanced neo-plasia in resected patients, is a careful combination of clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. This study aims to perform the comparison of a preoperative evaluation with pathological reports in IPMN and further, to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms (EEBGPCN) and Fukuoka Consensus guidelines (FCG). We analyzed 106 consecutive patients diagnosed with different types of PCN, among whom 68 had IPMN diagnosis, at the Clinical Center of Serbia. All the patients diagnosed with IPMNs were stratified concerning the presence of the absolute and relative indications according to EEBGPCN and high-risk stigmata and worrisome features according to FCG. Final histopathology revealed that IPMNs patients were further divided into malignant (50 patients) and benign (18 pa-tients) groups, according to the pathological findings. The preoperative prediction of malignancy according to EEBGPCN criteria was higher than 70% with high sensitivity of at least one absolute or relative indication for resection. The diagnostic performance of FCG was shown as comparable to EEBGPCN. Nevertheless, the value of false-positive rate for surgical resection showed that in some cases, overtreating patients or treating them too early cannot be prevented. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to adequately select patients for the resection considering at the same time both the risks of surgery and malignancy. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040678
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114067840&doi=10.3390%2fjcm10040678&partnerID=40&md5=7b5c4d9fb3cf57b72db1a9ade9b3e49d
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4341
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
dc.subjectPancreatic cystic neoplasm
dc.subjectValidation
dc.titleComparison of preoperative evaluation with the pathological report in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A single-center experience
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files