Publication:
Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: A comparative study

dc.contributor.authorBascarevic, Zoran (6506868841)
dc.contributor.authorVukasinovic, Zoran (7003989550)
dc.contributor.authorSlavkovic, Nemanja (16550887400)
dc.contributor.authorDulic, Borislav (23567505000)
dc.contributor.authorTrajkovic, Goran (9739203200)
dc.contributor.authorBascarevic, Violeta (21741918100)
dc.contributor.authorTimotijevic, Sladjan (6505830888)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T22:58:38Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T22:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and durability of alumina-on-alumina ceramic in comparison to metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoCr/HXLPE) bearing couples. This prospective randomised study involved 150 patients (157 hips). All patients (mean age: 54.7 years) obtained an identical fibre metal midcoat femoral stem and fibre metal-coated acetabular shell. In 78 patients (82 hips) we used alumina, while in 72 patients (75 hips) metal-polyethylene bearing couples were used. During a mean 50.4-month follow-up period (51 ± 8 alumina and 50 ± 8.9 metal-polyethylene) no statistically significant changes in clinical and radiographic parameters were noted between the two groups. There was no ceramic breakage and no need for revision surgery due to the ceramic liner. The alumina bearing couples proved to be as reliable as CoCr/HXLPE. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0899-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78549240215&doi=10.1007%2fs00264-009-0899-6&partnerID=40&md5=0022fffa4b49118c07ae9603c5d89933
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10222
dc.titleAlumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: A comparative study
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files