Publication:
An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34+ cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants

dc.contributor.authorBalint, Milena Todorović (57140127400)
dc.contributor.authorLemajić, Nikola (58669226700)
dc.contributor.authorJurišić, Vladimir (6603015144)
dc.contributor.authorPantelić, Sofija (58670044000)
dc.contributor.authorStanisavljević, Dejana (23566969700)
dc.contributor.authorKurtović, Nada Kraguljac (36195445000)
dc.contributor.authorBalint, Bela (7005347355)
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T11:51:10Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T11:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule with the ability to reversibly bind to receptor CXCR-4 thus leading to an increased release of stem cells (SC) into the circulation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of G-CSF plus plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilizing regimens on the basis of CD34+ cell yield and engraftment kinetics following hematopoietic SC transplants. Methods: The study incorporated 173 patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), undergoing mobilization and following autologous SC-transplant. For patients with mobilization failure and those predicted to be at risk of harvesting inadequate CD34+ yields (poor-responders), plerixafor was administered. Data was collected and compared in relation to the harvesting protocols used, cell quantification, cell-engraftment potential and overall clinical outcome. Results: A total of 101 patients received plerixafor (58.4 %) and the median CD34+increase was 312 %. Chemotherapy-mobilized PCN-patients required less plerixafor administration (p = 0.01), no difference was observed in lymphoma groups (p = 0.46). The median CD34+cell yield was 7.8 × 106/kg bm. Patients requiring plerixafor achieved lower, but still comparable cell yields. Total cell dose infused was in correlation with engraftment kinetics. Patients requiring plerixafor had delayed platelet engraftment (p = 0.029). Conclusions: Adequately selected plerixafor administration reduces "mobilization-related-failure" rate and assure a high-level cell dose for SC transplants, with superior "therapeutic-potential" and safety profile. The mobilization strategy that incorporates "just-in-time" plerixafor administration, also leads to a reduction of hospitalization days and healthcare resource utilization. For definitive conclusions, further controlled/larger clinical trials concerning correlation of CD34+ cell count/yield, with hematopoietic reconstitution are required. © 2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101811
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175204274&doi=10.1016%2fj.tranon.2023.101811&partnerID=40&md5=6e02fc37e686441d31753dd91007f42a
dc.identifier.urihttps://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1522
dc.subjectAutologous transplantation
dc.subjectCD34<sup>+</sup> cell mobilization
dc.subjectCytokines
dc.subjectG-CSF
dc.subjectPlerixafor
dc.titleAn evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34+ cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files