Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "van Dalen-Kok, Annelore H. (55774061600)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: Observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition
    (2020)
    de Waal, Margot W. M. (6602800094)
    ;
    van Dalen-Kok, Annelore H. (55774061600)
    ;
    de Vet, Henrica C. W. (55400049900)
    ;
    Gimenez-Llort, Lydia (6701506831)
    ;
    Konstantinovic, Ljubica (16207335300)
    ;
    de Tommaso, Marina (7004747853)
    ;
    Fischer, Thomas (56394973600)
    ;
    Lukas, Albert (23095110000)
    ;
    Kunz, Miriam (56219869100)
    ;
    Lautenbacher, Stefan (57207606511)
    ;
    Lobbezoo, Frank (7007027095)
    ;
    McGuire, Brian E. (7006440710)
    ;
    van der Steen, Jenny T. (7006246934)
    ;
    Achterberg, Wilco P. (6603741713)
    Background: Recognition of pain in people with dementia is challenging. Observational scales have been developed, but there is a need to harmonize and improve the assessment process. In EU initiative COST-Action TD1005, 36 promising items were selected from existing scales to be tested further. We aimed to study the observer agreement of each item, and to analyse the factor structure of the complete set. Methods: One hundred and ninety older persons with dementia were recruited in four different countries (Italy, Serbia, Spain and The Netherlands) from different types of healthcare facilities. Patients represented a convenience sample, with no pre-selection on presence of (suspected) pain. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC, research version) item pool includes facial expressions of pain (15 items), body movements (10 items) and vocalizations (11 items). Participants were observed by health professionals in two situations, at rest and during movement. Intrarater and interrater reliability was analysed by percentage agreement. The factor structure was examined with principal component analysis with orthogonal rotation. Results: Health professionals performed observations in 40–57 patients in each country. Intrarater and interrater agreement was generally high (≥70%). However, for some facial expression items, agreement was sometimes below 70%. Factor analyses showed a six-component solution, which were named as follows: Vocal pain expression, Face anatomical descriptors, Protective body movements, Vocal defence, Tension and Lack of affect. Conclusions: Observation of PAIC items can be done reliably in healthcare settings. Observer agreement is quite promising already without extensive training. Significance: In this international project, promising items from existing observational pain scales were identified and evaluated regarding their reliability as an alternative to pain self-report in people with dementia. Analysis on factor structure helped to understand the character of the items. Health professionals from four countries using four different European languages were able to rate items reliably. The results contributed to an informed reduction of items for a clinical observer scale (Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale with 15 items: PAIC15). © 2019 European Pain Federation - EFIC®
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): A multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta-tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia
    (2020)
    Kunz, Miriam (56219869100)
    ;
    de Waal, Margot W. M. (6602800094)
    ;
    Achterberg, Wilco P. (6603741713)
    ;
    Gimenez-Llort, Lydia (6701506831)
    ;
    Lobbezoo, Frank (7007027095)
    ;
    Sampson, Elisabeth L. (7005604974)
    ;
    van Dalen-Kok, Annelore H. (55774061600)
    ;
    Defrin, Ruth (6602338739)
    ;
    Invitto, Sara (54382017700)
    ;
    Konstantinovic, Ljubica (16207335300)
    ;
    Oosterman, Joukje (8767995000)
    ;
    Petrini, Laura (36881147200)
    ;
    van der Steen, Jenny T. (7006246934)
    ;
    Strand, Liv-Inger (7005396930)
    ;
    de Tommaso, Marina (7004747853)
    ;
    Zwakhalen, Sandra (6507184874)
    ;
    Husebo, Bettina S. (8293218100)
    ;
    Lautenbacher, Stefan (57207606511)
    Background: Over the last decades, a considerable number of observational scales have been developed to assess pain in persons with dementia. The time seems ripe now to build on the knowledge and expertize implemented in these scales to form an improved, “best-of” meta-tool. The EU-COST initiative “Pain in impaired cognition, especially dementia” aimed to do this by selecting items out of existing observational scales and critically re-assessing their suitability to detect pain in dementia. This paper reports on the final phase of this collaborative task. Methods: Items from existing observational pain scales were tested for “frequency of occurrence (item difficulty),” “reliability” and “validity.” This psychometric testing was carried out in eight countries, in different healthcare settings, and included clinical as well as experimental pain conditions. Results: Across all studies, 587 persons with dementia, 27 individuals with intellectual disability, 12 Huntington's disease patients and 59 cognitively healthy controls were observed during rest and movement situations or while receiving experimental pressure pain, respectively. The psychometric outcomes for each item across the different studies were evaluated within an international and multidisciplinary team of experts and led a final selection of 15 items (5x facial expressions, 5x body movements, 5x vocalizations). Conclusions: The final list of 15 observational items have demonstrated psychometric quality and clinical usefulness both in their former scales and in the present international evaluation; accordingly, they qualified twice to form a new internationally agreed-on meta-tool for Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition, the PAIC-15 scale. Significance: Using a meta-tool approach by building on previous observational pain assessment scales and putting the items of these scales through rigorous empirical testing (using experimental as well as clinical pain studies in several European countries), we were able to identify the best items for pain assessment in individuals with impaired cognition. These selected items form the novel PAIC15 scale (pain assessment in impaired cognition, 15 items). © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC®

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback