Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Zwackman, Sammy (57222371591)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction
    (2024)
    Böhm, Felix (7007035623)
    ;
    Mogensen, Brynjölfur (7003995909)
    ;
    Engstrøm, Thomas (7004069840)
    ;
    Stankovic, Goran (59150945500)
    ;
    Srdanovic, Ilija (6506056556)
    ;
    Lønborg, Jacob (12240126300)
    ;
    Zwackman, Sammy (57222371591)
    ;
    Hamid, Mehmet (56624008800)
    ;
    Kellerth, Thomas (59852157900)
    ;
    Lauermann, Jörg (57195955901)
    ;
    Kajander, Olli A. (6603592918)
    ;
    Andersson, Jonas (57614259700)
    ;
    Linder, Rikard (7102201002)
    ;
    Angerås, Oskar (55580696900)
    ;
    Renlund, Henrik (36351070000)
    ;
    Ērglis, Andrejs (6602259794)
    ;
    Menon, Madhav (57190861283)
    ;
    Schultz, Carl (7202476533)
    ;
    Laine, Mika (55481374000)
    ;
    Held, Claes (7005675618)
    ;
    Rück, Andreas (7006743933)
    ;
    Östlund, Ollie (36060009000)
    ;
    James, Stefan (34769603200)
    BACKGROUND The benefit of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease remains unclear. METHODS In this multinational, registry-based, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI or very-high-risk non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either FFR-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or no further revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The two key secondary outcomes were a composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS A total of 1542 patients underwent randomization, with 764 assigned to receive FFR-guided complete revascularization and 778 assigned to receive culprit-lesion-only PCI. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 4.3 to 5.2), a primary-outcome event had occurred in 145 patients (19.0%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 159 patients (20.4%) in the culprit-lesion-only group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.17; P=0.53). With respect to the secondary outcomes, no apparent between-group differences were observed in the composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.44) or unplanned revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04). There were no apparent between-group differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with STEMI or very-high-risk NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided complete revascularization was not shown to result in a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only PCI at 4.8 years. Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback