Browsing by Author "Zdujic, Nenad (58943540300)"

Background: Surgical resection remains an important treatment of choice for a large number of liver tumors in children. Sometimes, if a tumor infiltrates a large part of the liver, after resection, the future liver remnant (FLR) is not enough for normal liver function. The size of the FLR is one of the determining factors for resectability as postoperative liver failure (PLF) is the most severe complication after partial hepatectomy. A new strategy for treating marginally resectable liver tumors in adult patients which were initially considered as unresectable was formally reported in 2011. This operative technique is a hepatectomy consisting of two stages with initial portal vein ligation and in situ splitting of the liver parenchyma. In 2012, the acronym “ALPPS” (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) was proposed for this novel technique. However, there is a small number of ALPPS procedures performed in pediatric patients published in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to present the first case of a pediatric patient with a marginally resectable rhabdoid tumor of the liver which was initially considered unresectable and who was treated with two-stage hepatectomy. We report a case of a 4-month-old girl with a large rhabdoid tumor of the liver who underwent this procedure. Conclusions: ALPPS can be a valuable technique to achieve complete resection of pediatric liver tumors although indications for ALPPS in children still need further research mainly focused on validation of the minimally needed FLR in children undergoing extended liver resections. To our knowledge, this is the youngest patient on whom ALPPS was performed, and the only one with a rhabdoid tumor. © 2025 by the authors.

Background: Surgical resection remains an important treatment of choice for a large number of liver tumors in children. Sometimes, if a tumor infiltrates a large part of the liver, after resection, the future liver remnant (FLR) is not enough for normal liver function. The size of the FLR is one of the determining factors for resectability as postoperative liver failure (PLF) is the most severe complication after partial hepatectomy. A new strategy for treating marginally resectable liver tumors in adult patients which were initially considered as unresectable was formally reported in 2011. This operative technique is a hepatectomy consisting of two stages with initial portal vein ligation and in situ splitting of the liver parenchyma. In 2012, the acronym “ALPPS” (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) was proposed for this novel technique. However, there is a small number of ALPPS procedures performed in pediatric patients published in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to present the first case of a pediatric patient with a marginally resectable rhabdoid tumor of the liver which was initially considered unresectable and who was treated with two-stage hepatectomy. We report a case of a 4-month-old girl with a large rhabdoid tumor of the liver who underwent this procedure. Conclusions: ALPPS can be a valuable technique to achieve complete resection of pediatric liver tumors although indications for ALPPS in children still need further research mainly focused on validation of the minimally needed FLR in children undergoing extended liver resections. To our knowledge, this is the youngest patient on whom ALPPS was performed, and the only one with a rhabdoid tumor. © 2025 by the authors.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes following liver resection between patients with prolonged cumulative ischemia time (CIT) which exceeded 60 min and patients with CIT less than 60 min. Methods: Between March 2020 and October 2022, 164 consecutive patients underwent liver resection at the Unit for hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery in Belgrade, Serbia. Intermittent Pringle maneuver was routinely applied. Depending on CIT during transection, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (CIT <60 min) included 101 patients, and group 2 (CIT ≥60 min) included 63 patients. Results: Median operative time (210 vs. 400 min) and CIT (30 vs. 76 min) were longer in the Group 2 (p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was higher in the Group 2 (150 vs 500 ml), p < 0.001. The perioperative transfusion rate was similar between the groups (p = 0.107). There was no difference in postoperative overall morbidity (50.5% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.337) and major morbidity (18.8 vs. 19%, p = 0.401). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality were similar between the groups (p = 0.408; p = 0.408; p = 0.252, respectively). Non-anatomical liver resection was the only predictive factor of 90-day mortality identified by multivariate analysis (p = 0.047; Relative Risk = 0.179; 95% Confidence Interval 0.033–0.981). Conclusion: Intermittent Pringle maneuver with CIT exceeding 60 min is a safe method for bleeding control during liver resection with no impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Keywords: intermittent Pringle maneuver, liver ischemia, liver resection. © 2024 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Society of Coloproctology