Browsing by Author "Wanner, Christoph (57212349814)"

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Historical concerns about cardiovascular (CV) risks associated with certain glucose-lowering medications gave rise to the introduction of cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs). Initially implemented to help monitor the CV safety of glucose-lowering drugs in patients with T2D, who either had established CVD or were at high risk of CVD, data that emerged from some of these trials started to show benefits. Alongside the anticipated CV safety of many of these agents, evidence for certain sodium–glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have revealed potential cardioprotective effects in patients with T2D who are at high risk of CVD events. Reductions in 3-point major adverse CV events (3P-MACE) and CV death have been noted in some of these CVOTs, with additional benefits including reduced risks of hospitalisation for heart failure, progression of renal disease, and all-cause mortality. These new data are leading to a paradigm shift in the current management of T2D, with international guidelines now prioritising SGLT2 inhibitors and/or GLP-1 RAs in certain patient populations. However, clinicians are faced with a large volume of CVOT data when seeking to use this evidence base to bring opportunities to improve CV, heart failure and renal outcomes, and even reduce mortality, in their patients with T2D. The aim of this review is to provide an in-depth summary of CVOT data—crystallising the key findings, from safety to efficacy—and to offer a practical perspective for physicians. Finally, we discuss the next steps for the post-CVOT era, with ongoing studies that may further transform clinical practice and improve outcomes for people with T2D, heart failure or renal disease. © 2022, The Author(s).

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4)inhibitors are a class of glucose-lowering agent for type 2 diabetes (T2D)that are commonly used in clinical practice. With the recent disclosure of data from the CARMELINA cardiovascular outcomes trial (CVOT), which investigated linagliptin, CV and renal outcomes data are now available for four agents in the DPP-4 inhibitor class that are approved in most markets. To consider how the CARMELINA study may be interpreted, and the relevance for our clinical practice, we convened as an expert group of diabetes specialists from the Central and Eastern Europe region to discuss the new disclosures. Our discussions revealed a general confidence in safety across the class that is further supported by CARMELINA. However, we also concluded that there are important differences in the available evidence level between agents in the setting of heart failure and data on renal outcomes. Here, we noted the clinical relevance to our practice of the study population in CARMELINA, which is unique among CVOTs in including a majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the risk for future development of renal impairment that is associated with T2D even in patients without current overt CKD, we believe that the CARMELINA study provides important new insights that are clinically relevant for a broad range of patients. Finally, we discuss how these insights can be integrated into the approach to the pharmacotherapeutic management of hyperglycaemia that is recommended in newly updated guidelines. © 2019

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4)inhibitors are a class of glucose-lowering agent for type 2 diabetes (T2D)that are commonly used in clinical practice. With the recent disclosure of data from the CARMELINA cardiovascular outcomes trial (CVOT), which investigated linagliptin, CV and renal outcomes data are now available for four agents in the DPP-4 inhibitor class that are approved in most markets. To consider how the CARMELINA study may be interpreted, and the relevance for our clinical practice, we convened as an expert group of diabetes specialists from the Central and Eastern Europe region to discuss the new disclosures. Our discussions revealed a general confidence in safety across the class that is further supported by CARMELINA. However, we also concluded that there are important differences in the available evidence level between agents in the setting of heart failure and data on renal outcomes. Here, we noted the clinical relevance to our practice of the study population in CARMELINA, which is unique among CVOTs in including a majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Given the risk for future development of renal impairment that is associated with T2D even in patients without current overt CKD, we believe that the CARMELINA study provides important new insights that are clinically relevant for a broad range of patients. Finally, we discuss how these insights can be integrated into the approach to the pharmacotherapeutic management of hyperglycaemia that is recommended in newly updated guidelines. © 2019

[No abstract available]

Background: This study investigated in a North American patient population the longer-term treatment effects of the phosphate binder, colestilan, in patients with CKD Stage 5D and hyperphosphataemia. Methods: One hundred and sixteen CKD Stage 5D patients with hyperphosphataemia were entered into a multi-centre, open-label study where they received flexible dose colestilan (6-15 g/day) to maintain serum phosphorus levels between 3.5 and 5.5 mg/dl. The primary endpoint was safety, assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by changes in serum phosphorus, mineral metabolism, lipids, HbA1c, uric acid and bone markers. Results: Serum phosphorus was significantly reduced by 1.18 mg/dl (p < 0.001), from 6.99 mg/dl at baseline to 5.80 mg/dl at week 52. LDL-cholesterol was also significantly reduced as well as uric acid. Significant change was observed only for one bone marker - PINP. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. Nausea (22.4%), vomiting (21.6%), and diarrhoea (19.8%) were most commonly reported. Conclusions: Long-term flexible dosing with colestilan reduces serum phosphorus and demonstrates an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. Copyright: All rights reserved.

Background/Aims: Colestilan is a new non-calcium-based phosphate binder licensed in Europe for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis (CKD 5D). This study was conducted to evaluate efficacy in a North American patient population and also to examine secondary actions of colestilan on lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study, after an initial open-label titration period. Patients (n = 245) with stable phosphate control received 6-15 g/day colestilan during a 12-week, flexible titration period after which 169 were randomized to continue the same dose (n = 85) or switch to placebo (n = 84) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus level during the placebo-controlled withdrawal period. Results: A significant difference of -1.01 mg/dl (-0.33 mmol/l) in mean change in serum phosphorus, favoring colestilan, was seen during the placebo-controlled withdrawal period (p < 0.001). Colestilan reduced serum phosphorus significantly from baseline to week 12 (-1.54 mg/dl (-0.50 mmol/l); p < 0.001). Serum calcium levels were not affected. Colestilan significantly reduced and maintained reductions in calcium × phosphorus ion product (Ca × P), parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, uric acid and also HbA1c in patients with elevated baseline HbA1c. Colestilan was generally well tolerated; most adverse events were gastrointestinal. Conclusion: In this first clinical trial with colestilan in a North American patient population, colestilan demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling serum phosphorus levels in CKD 5D patients with hyperphosphatemia, without increasing calcium levels. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved.

Background/Aims: Colestilan is a new non-calcium-based phosphate binder licensed in Europe for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis (CKD 5D). This study was conducted to evaluate efficacy in a North American patient population and also to examine secondary actions of colestilan on lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study, after an initial open-label titration period. Patients (n = 245) with stable phosphate control received 6-15 g/day colestilan during a 12-week, flexible titration period after which 169 were randomized to continue the same dose (n = 85) or switch to placebo (n = 84) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus level during the placebo-controlled withdrawal period. Results: A significant difference of -1.01 mg/dl (-0.33 mmol/l) in mean change in serum phosphorus, favoring colestilan, was seen during the placebo-controlled withdrawal period (p < 0.001). Colestilan reduced serum phosphorus significantly from baseline to week 12 (-1.54 mg/dl (-0.50 mmol/l); p < 0.001). Serum calcium levels were not affected. Colestilan significantly reduced and maintained reductions in calcium × phosphorus ion product (Ca × P), parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, uric acid and also HbA1c in patients with elevated baseline HbA1c. Colestilan was generally well tolerated; most adverse events were gastrointestinal. Conclusion: In this first clinical trial with colestilan in a North American patient population, colestilan demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling serum phosphorus levels in CKD 5D patients with hyperphosphatemia, without increasing calcium levels. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved.

BackgroundThis study provides a summary of the 2010 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org).MethodsThis report includes data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) using data from the national and regional renal registries in 29 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Individual patient data were received from 27 registries, whereas 18 registries contributed data in aggregated form. We present incidence and prevalence of RRT, transplant rates, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes. The latter two are solely based on individual patient records.ResultsIn 2010, the overall incidence rate of RRT for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among all registries reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry was 123 per million population (pmp) (n = 91 798). The highest incidence rate was reported by Turkey (252pmp) and the lowest reported by Montenegro (21 pmp). The overall prevalence of RRT for ESRD at 31 December 2010 among all registries reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry was 741 pmp (n = 551 005). The prevalence varied from 124 pmp in Ukraine to 1580 pmp in Portugal. The overall number of renal transplantations performed in 2010 among all registries was 29.2 pmp (n = 21 740). The highest overall transplant rate was reported from Spain, Cantabria (73 pmp), whereas the highest transplant rate for living donor kidneys was reported from the Netherlands (28 pmp). For patients who started RRT between 2001 and 2005, the unadjusted 5-year patient survival on RRT was 46.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.0-46.3], and on dialysis 38.6% (95% CI 38.5-38.8). The unadjusted 5-year patient survival after the first renal transplantation performed between 2001 and 2005 was 86.6% (95% CI 86.1-87.1) for deceased donor kidneys and 94.1% (95% CI 93.4-94.8) for living donor kidneys. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

BackgroundThis article provides a summary of the 2011 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org).MethodsData on renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from national and regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea were used. From 27 registries, individual patient data were received, whereas 17 registries contributed data in aggregated form. We present the incidence and prevalence of RRT, and renal transplant rates in 2011. In addition, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated for those registries providing individual patient data.ResultsThe overall unadjusted incidence rate of RRT in 2011 among all registries reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry was 117 per million population (pmp) (n = 71.631). Incidence rates varied from 24 pmp in Ukraine to 238 pmp in Turkey. The overall unadjusted prevalence of RRT for ESRD on 31 December 2011 was 692 pmp (n = 425 824). The highest prevalence was reported by Portugal (1662 pmp) and the lowest by Ukraine (131 pmp). Among all registries, a total of 22 814 renal transplantations were performed (37 pmp). The highest overall transplant rate was reported from Spain, Cantabria (81 pmp), whereas the highest rate of living donor transplants was reported from Turkey (39 pmp). For patients who started RRT between 2002 and 2006, the unadjusted 5-year patient survival on RRT was 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.6-47.0], and on dialysis 39.3% (95% CI 39.2-39.4). The unadjusted 5-year patient survival after the first renal transplantation performed between 2002 and 2006 was 86.7% (95% CI 86.2-87.2) for kidneys from deceased donors and 94.3% (95% CI 93.6-95.0) for kidneys from living donors. © 2014 © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Background. This article summarizes the 2012 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org) with a specific focus on older patients (defined as ≥65 years). Methods. Data provided by 45 national or regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea were used. Individual patient level data were received from 31 renal registries, whereas 14 renal registries contributed data in an aggregated form. The incidence, prevalence and survival probabilities of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) and renal transplantation rates for 2012 are presented. Results. In 2012, the overall unadjusted incidence rate of patients with ESRD receiving RRT was 109.6 per million population (pmp) (n = 69 035), ranging from 219.9 pmp in Portugal to 24.2 pmp in Montenegro. The proportion of incident patients ≥75 years varied from 15 to 44% between countries. The overall unadjusted prevalence on 31 December 2012 was 716.7 pmp (n = 451 270), ranging from 1670.2 pmp in Portugal to 146.7 pmp in the Ukraine. The proportion of prevalent patients ≥75 years varied from 11 to 32% between countries. The overall renal transplantation rate in 2012 was 28.3 pmp (n = 15 673), with the highest rate seen in the Spanish region of Catalonia. The proportion of patients ≥65 years receiving a transplant ranged from 0 to 35%. Five-year adjusted survival for all RRT patients was 59.7% (95% confidence interval, CI: 59.3-60.0) which fell to 39.3% (95% CI: 38.7-39.9) in patients 65-74 years and 21.3% (95% CI: 20.8-21.9) in patients ≥75 years. © The Author 2015.

The 7th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit on Cardiovascular, Renal, and Glycemic Outcomes, was held virtually on November 18–19, 2021. Pursuing the tradition of the previous summits, this reference congress served as a platform for in-depth discussion and exchange on recently completed CVOTs. This year’s focus was placed on the outcomes of EMPEROR-Preserved, FIGARO-DKD, AMPLITUDE-O, SURPASS 1–5, and STEP 1–5. Trial implications for diabetes and obesity management and the impact on new treatment algorithms were highlighted for endocrinologists, diabetologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, and general practitioners. Discussions evolved from outcome trials using SGLT2 inhibitors as therapy for heart failure, to CVOTs with nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Furthermore, trials for glycemic and overweight/obesity management, challenges in diabetes management in COVID-19, and novel guidelines and treatment strategies were discussed. Trial registration The 8th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held virtually on November 10–11, 2022 (http://www.cvot.org). © 2022, The Author(s).

Background This study compared the effects of short-term titrated colestilan (a novel non-absorbable, non-calcium, phosphate binder) with placebo, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of colestilan over 1 year compared with sevelamer, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) 5D. Methods This prospective multicentre study comprised a 4-week phosphate binder washout period, a 16-week short-term, flexible-dose, treatment period (including a 4-week placebo-controlled withdrawal period) and a 40-week extension treatment phase. Results At Week 16 (the end of the 4-week placebo-controlled withdrawal period), serum phosphorus level was 0.43 mmol/L (1.32 mg/dL) lower with colestilan than placebo (P < 0.001; primary end point). Serum LDL-C level was also lower with colestilan than with placebo (P < 0.001). Both colestilan and sevelamer produced significant reductions from baseline in serum phosphorus levels (P < 0.001), maintained for 1 year, and the proportion of patients achieving target levels of ≤1.78 mmol/L (5.5 mg/dL) or ≤1.95 mmol/L (6.0 mg/dL) at study end were similar (65.3 and 73.3%, respectively, for colestilan, and 66.9 and 77.4%, respectively, for sevelamer). Serum calcium level remained stable in the colestilan group but tended to increase slightly in the sevelamer group (end-of-study increase of 0.035 mmol/L over baseline). Both binders produced similar reductions from baseline in LDL-C level (P < 0.001), and responder rates after 1 year, using a target of <1.83 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or <2.59 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) were similar in both groups (50.7 and 85.3% for colestilan and 54.0 and 80.6% for sevelamer). Colestilan was generally well tolerated. Conclusions Colestilan is effective and safe for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD 5D, and affords similar long-term phosphorus and cholesterol reductions/responder rates to sevelamer. © 2013 The Author.