Browsing by Author "Vraynko, Elif (59476615900)"

Objective: Previous works have struggled to clearly define sex-specific outcomes based on initial management in NSTE-ACS patients. We examined if early revascularization (<24 h) versus conservative strategy impacts differently based on sex and age in stable NSTE-ACS patients upon hospital admission. Methods: We identified 8905 patients with diagnosis of non‐ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in the ISACS-TC database. Patients with cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and serious ventricular arrhythmias were excluded. The final cohort consisted of 7589 patients. The characteristics between groups were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting models. Primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) with their 95 % CIs were employed. Results: Of the 7589 NSTE-ACS patients identified, 2450 (32.3 %) were women. The data show a notable reduction in mortality for the older women (aged 65 years and older) undergoing early invasive strategy compared to those receiving an initial conservative (3.0 % versus 5.1 %; RR: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.32 – 0.99) Conversely, younger women did not exhibit a significant association between early invasive strategy and mortality reduction (2.0 % versus 0.9 %; RR: 2.27; 95 % CI: 0.73 – 7.04). For men, age stratification did not markedly alter the observed benefits of an early invasive strategy over a conservative approach in the overall population, with reduced death rates in both older (3.1 % versus 5.7 %; RR: 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.34 – 0.80) and younger age groups (0.8 % versus 1.7 %; RR: 0.46; 95 % CI: 0.22 – 0.94). These age and sex-specific mortality patterns did not significantly change within subgroups stratified by the presence of NSTEMI, or a GRACE risk score>140. Conclusion: Early coronary revascularization is associated with improved 30-day survival in older men and women and younger men who present to hospital in stable conditions after NSTE-ACS. It does not confer a survival advantage in young women. Further studies are needed to more accurately risk-stratify young women to guide treatment strategies. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01218776 © 2025 The Author(s)

Aims: To investigate the impact of an early coronary revascularization (<24 h) compared with initial conservative strategy on clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are in stable condition at hospital admission. Methods and results: The International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes database was queried for a sample of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. Patients with cardiac arrest, haemodynamic instability, and serious ventricular arrhythmias were excluded. The characteristics between groups were adjusted using logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting models. Primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed. Of the 7589 NSTE-ACS patients identified, 2343 were diabetics. The data show a notable reduction in mortality for the elderly (>65 years) undergoing early revascularization compared to those receiving an initial conservative strategy both in the diabetic (3.3% vs. 6.7%; RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28-0.80) and nondiabetic patients (2.7% vs. 4.7%: RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36-0.90). In multivariate analyses, diabetes was a strong independent predictor of mortality in the elderly (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.03-1.99), but not in the younger patients (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.53-2.06). Conclusion: Early coronary revascularization does not lead to any survival advantage within 30 days from admission in young NSTE-ACS patients who present to hospital in stable conditions with and without diabetes. An early invasive management strategy may be best reserved for the elderly. Factors beyond revascularization are of considerable importance for outcome in elderly diabetic subjects with NSTE-ACS. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.