Browsing by Author "VARAGIć, V.M. (7006591279)"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication THE EFFECT OF 5‘‐N‐ETHYLCARBOXAMIDEADENOSINE ON THE ISOLATED HEMIDIAPHRAGM OF THE RAT DURING DIRECT AND INDIRECT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION(1989) ;PROSTRAN, M. (7004009031)VARAGIć, V.M. (7006591279)Summary— Similar to adenosine and some of its derivatives, 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamideadenosine (NECA) produced a biphasic effect on the isolated hemidiaphragm of the rat: a potentiation of the isometric contraction during direct electrical stimulation (in the presence of dipyridamole), and a depression during indirect electrical stimulation, and particularly so in a partially curarized preparation. The potentiating effect is presumed to be due to activation of the cAMP system, probably through A2 receptor sites, although a differentiation of the receptor subtype could not be made with aminophylline and XAC. Inhibition is most probably due to a depressant action of NECA on the acetylcholine release from the motor nerve terminals. These results accord with our previous findings, suggesting that adenosine may be part of a buffer system which participates in balancing the excitatory and inhibitory influences on skeletal muscle contraction. 1989 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication THE EFFECT OF 5‘‐N‐ETHYLCARBOXAMIDEADENOSINE ON THE ISOLATED HEMIDIAPHRAGM OF THE RAT DURING DIRECT AND INDIRECT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION(1989) ;PROSTRAN, M. (7004009031)VARAGIć, V.M. (7006591279)Summary— Similar to adenosine and some of its derivatives, 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamideadenosine (NECA) produced a biphasic effect on the isolated hemidiaphragm of the rat: a potentiation of the isometric contraction during direct electrical stimulation (in the presence of dipyridamole), and a depression during indirect electrical stimulation, and particularly so in a partially curarized preparation. The potentiating effect is presumed to be due to activation of the cAMP system, probably through A2 receptor sites, although a differentiation of the receptor subtype could not be made with aminophylline and XAC. Inhibition is most probably due to a depressant action of NECA on the acetylcholine release from the motor nerve terminals. These results accord with our previous findings, suggesting that adenosine may be part of a buffer system which participates in balancing the excitatory and inhibitory influences on skeletal muscle contraction. 1989 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique
