Browsing by Author "Unic-Stojanovic, Dragana (55376745500)"

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure performed to reduce the incidence of embolic and thrombotic stroke. Although only a preventive procedure, CEA carries the risk of perioperative complications. There is constant searching for an optimal anesthetic technique. There are pros and cons for both anesthetic techniques used: regional (RA) and general anesthesia (GA). A large number of studies have compared RA and GA techniques in CEA surgery patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. However, neither the GALA trial nor the pooled analysis was adequately powered to reliably detect an effect of type of anesthesia on mortality. It may therefore be appropriate to consider other additional parameters (stress response, incidence of postoperative delirium and cognitive impairment, functional recovery, total surgery time, intensive care unit requirement, hospital stay, hospital costs and patients satisfaction) when comparing the outcomes of the two techniques. Although, the debate continues as to whether regional anesthesia or general anesthesia is safer, the choice of anesthetic technique is a complex decision and surgical teams should be able to offer both RA and GA. The individual approach is the ideal choice and should be determined at the discretion of the surgeon, anesthetist and patient depending on the clinical situation and own preferences. © 2015 Signa Vitae. All rights reserved.

[No abstract available]

Purpose: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an option for carotid restenosis (CR) treatment with favorable outcomes. However, CAS has also emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the management of patients with primary carotid stenosis. This study aimed to report CR rates after CAS was performed in patients with primary lesions versus restenosis after CEA, to identify predictors of CR, and to report both neurological and overall outcomes. Materials and methods: From January 2000 to September 2018, a total of 782 patients were divided into 2 groups: The CAS (prim) group consisted of 440 patients in whom CAS was performed for primary lesions, and the CAS (res) group consisted of 342 patients with CAS due to restenosis after CEA. Indications for CAS were symptomatic stenosis/restenosis >70% and asymptomatic stenosis/restenosis >85%. A color duplex scan (CDS) of carotid arteries was performed 6 months after CAS, after 1 year, and annually afterward. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 88 months, with a mean follow-up of 34.6±18.0 months. Results: There were no differences in terms of CR rate between the patients in the CAS (prim) and CAS (res) groups (8.7% vs 7.2%, χ2=0.691, p=0.406). The overall CR rate was 7.9%, whereas significant CR (>70%) rate needing re-intervention was 5.6%, but there was no difference between patients in the CAS (prim) and CAS (res) groups (6.4% vs 4.7%, p=0.351). Six independent predictors for CR were smoking, associated previous myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, plaque morphology, spasm after CAS, the use of FilterWire or Spider Fx cerebral protection devices, and time after stenting. A carotid restenosis risk index (CRRI) was created based on these predictors and ranged from –7 (minimal risk) to +10 (maximum risk); patients with a score >–4 were at increased risk for CR. There were no differences in terms of neurological and overall morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. Conclusions: There was no difference in CR rate after CAS between the patients with primary stenosis and restenosis after CEA. A CRRI score >–4 is a criterion for identifying high-risk patients for post-CAS CR that should be tested in future randomized trials. © The Author(s) 2022.

[No abstract available]

Copeptin is a sensitive and more stable surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin. In this study, we evaluated copeptin levels in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients, perioperatively, to determine whether copeptin levels can be related to carotid artery cross clamping (CC) time and to postoperative neurological outcomes. Copeptin, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, cortisol, and brain natriuretic peptide were measured preoperatively (T1) and 3 hours postoperatively (T3) as well as intraoperatively (T2). We recruited 77 patients. Values of copeptin rose gradually over the observed times: T1 = 7.9 (6.4-9.6), T2 = 12.6 (9.3-16.8), and T3 = 72.3 (49.1-111.2) pmol/L. There was a significant difference for repeated measurement (P =.000, P =.000, and P =.000). Duration of carotid artery CC during CEA does not affect postoperative copeptin level (CC ≤ 13 minutes: 106.8 ± 93.6 pmol/L, CC > 13 minutes: 96.7 ± 89.1 pmol/L; P =.634). Preoperative copeptin level was significantly higher in patients with ulcerated plaque morphology. Activation of the stress axis in patients undergoing CEA results in copeptin elevation. Duration of CC during CEA does not affect postoperative copeptin levels. © 2016 SAGE Publications.

Pediatric cardiac anesthesia is a subspecialty of cardiac and pediatric anesthesiology dedicated to the perioperative care of patients with congenital heart disease. Members of the Congenital and Education Subcommittees of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) agreed on the necessity to develop an EACTAIC pediatric cardiac anesthesia fellowship curriculum. This manuscript represents a consensus on the composition and the design of the EACTAIC Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia Fellowship program. This curriculum provides a basis for the training of future pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists by clearly defining the theoretical and practical requirements for fellows and host centers. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.

[No abstract available]

Background: The aim of this paper is to determine which therapy gives best results regarding process of healing of diabetic foot ulcers among three proposed: only negative pressure wound therapy, only hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and both when used in conjunction. Methods: This bicentric prospective study included 60 patients, and they were, consecutively, assigned to one of three groups. The first group consisted of 20 patients who were treated only by hyperbaric oxygen therapy, second group consisted of 20 patients treated with combined hyperbaric oxygen and negative pressure wound therapy, and third group consisted of 20 patients who were treated only by negative pressure wound therapy. In some cases, previous revascularization of lower limb was performed and patients with poor run-off, without possibility to perform revascularization, were excluded from the study. Results: Patients were predominantly men (56.7%) and mean age was 60.57 years. Majority of patients had ulcers of ischemic origin (45%), in 30% of cases, the reason of foot ulceration was neuropathy, and in 25% of patients, the etiology was combined. During the study, in three patients (5%), minor amputations were observed. Regarding Wagner classification of foot ulcers, most dominant was stage II (χ = 12.618, df = 4, p < 0.05). Statistically significant reduction of wound area was achieved when hyperbaric oxygen and negative pressure wound therapy were used in conjunction comparing to isolated use either of these two modalities of treatment (χ = 116.000, df = 44, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our data suggests simultaneous use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and negative pressure wound therapy in diabetic foot ulcer treatment in order to achieve best results. Of great importance is previous wound debridement and successful limb revascularization. © 2019, Research Society for Study of Diabetes in India.

Objectives: The quality of postoperative pain management is often poor. A "bundle," a small set of evidence-based interventions, is associated with improved outcomes in different settings. We assessed whether staff caring for surgical patients could implement a "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" and whether this would be associated with improved multidimensional pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: "PAIN OUT," a perioperative pain registry, offers tools for auditing pain-related PROs and obtaining information about perioperative pain management during the first 24 hours after surgery. Staff from 10 hospitals in Serbia used this methodology to collect data at baseline. They then implemented the "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" into the clinical routine and collected another round of data. The bundle consists of 4 treatment elements: (1) a full daily dose of 1 to 2 nonopioid analgesics (eg, paracetamol and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), (2) at least 1 type of local/regional anesthesia, (3) pain assessment by staff, and (4) offering patients information about pain management. The primary endpoint was a multidimensional pain composite score (PCS), evaluating pain intensity, interference, and side effects that was compared between patients who received the full bundle versus not. Results: Implementation of the complete bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the PCS (P < 0.001, small-medium effect size [ES]). When each treatment element was evaluated independently, nonopioid analgesics were associated with a higher PCS (ie, poorer outcome, and negligible ES), and the other elements were associated with a lower PCS (all negligible small ES). Individual PROs were consistently better in patients receiving the full bundle compared with 0 to 3 elements. The PCS was not associated with the surgical discipline. Discussion: We report findings from using a bundle approach for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing mixed surgical procedures. Future work will seek strategies to improve the effect. © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Background: We investigated changes to transfusion practices over time in paediatric liver transplant centre and evaluated the effect of transfusion practice to mortality. Methods: A pilot retrospective study included two cohorts each with 101 sequential paediatric LT recipients: an Early group (1994–1998) and a Recent group (2009–2013). Demographic characteristics and data on the intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells (RBC), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), platelets and cryoprecipitate were collected. Postoperative laboratory results were also obtained, together with donor and data regarding 1- and 5-year survival. Appropriate intergroup comparisons, univariate and multivariate analysis were made and P ≤ 0·05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no significant group differences in demographic data (except patient height). Despite the fact that median total blood loss did not differ between groups (111 ml/kg in both groups), the Early group had greater levels of intraoperative RBC transfusion (75 vs. 59 ml/kg, respectively, P = 0·04) and less use of FFP (53 vs. 62 ml/kg, respectively, P = 0·01). Overall we noted a lower 1- and 5-year survival in the Early group (88·2% vs. 96%, P = 0·04 and 82·4% vs. 89·1%, P = 0·01, respectively). Univariate, but not multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that higher PELD score, RBC and FFP transfusion, and inclusion in the Early group were contributing factors to 1-year higher mortality. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of blood loss and replacement in paediatric LT patients demonstrates that the majority of our patients suffer major haemorrhage and require large-volume RBC and FFP replacements. In our pilot study, large volume of RBC and FFP replacement did not contribute to mortality. Paediatric LT involves a number of multidisciplinary teams. Thus, all care-related factors and combinations thereof that may contribute to outcome and should be evaluated in the future. © 2019 International Society of Blood Transfusion

[No abstract available]