Browsing by Author "Trenson, Sander (37562245900)"

Aims: We assessed the outcome of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with heart failure (HF) compared with patients with other cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors (arterial hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidaemia). We further wanted to determine the incidence of HF events and its consequences in these patient populations. Methods and results: International retrospective Postgraduate Course in Heart Failure registry for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and CArdioVascular disease and/or risk factors (arterial hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidaemia) was performed in 28 centres from 15 countries (PCHF-COVICAV). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Of 1974 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 1282 had cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors (median age: 72 [interquartile range: 62–81] years, 58% male), with HF being present in 256 [20%] patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 25% (n = 323/1282 deaths). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with a history of HF (36%, n = 92) compared with non-HF patients (23%, n = 231, odds ratio [OR] 1.93 [95% confidence interval: 1.44–2.59], P < 0.001). After adjusting, HF remained associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.01–2.06], P = 0.041). Importantly, 186 of 1282 [15%] patients had an acute HF event during hospitalization (76 [40%] with de novo HF), which was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (89 [48%] vs. 220 [23%]) than in patients without HF event (OR 3.10 [2.24–4.29], P < 0.001). Conclusions: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with HF are at increased risk for in-hospital death. In-hospital worsening of HF or acute HF de novo are common and associated with a further increase in in-hospital mortality. © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of selected heart failure patients. However, a relevant proportion of patients do not show beneficial response. Identification of simple, additive, and outcome-relevant selection criteria may improve selection of patients. Objective: We sought to determine whether baseline QRS amplitude is associated with outcome in CRT. Methods: Quantification of intrinsic, pre–CRT implantation QRS amplitude was performed in an observational multinational 2-center retrospective cohort analysis (derivation cohort Zurich, n = 178, 2000–2015; validation cohort Leuven, n = 183, 1999–2016) with a composite end point of all-cause mortality, ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation at 5 years. Results: Higher baseline to peak amplitude in lateral leads (lead I and V6) was associated with a lower risk of reaching the composite end point (lead I: hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.95] per millivolt, P = .002; lead V6: hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.88–1.00] per millivolt, P = .043). Concordance index–based comparison of quartile, spline, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested cutoff values of 6 mV for lead I and 3 mV for V6 for optimal discrimination of outcome. External validation confirmed the cutoff of 3 mV in lead V6 as a highly significant discriminator of outcome (P < .001) associated with a risk reduction of 65%. Conclusion: Low QRS amplitude in lateral electrocardiogram leads is associated with higher risk of poor outcome in CRT patients. A cutoff of 3 mV in lead V6 proved highly discriminative. Further studies need to confirm the additive value of QRS amplitude in selection of patients for CRT and to assess whether CRT may be made available to more patients. © 2024

Introduction: The high-risk population of patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease or risk factors (RF) suffering from COVID-19 is heterogeneous. Several predictors for impaired prognosis have been identified. However, with machine learning (ML) approaches, certain phenotypes may be confined to classify the affected population and to predict outcome. This study aimed to phenotype patients using unsupervised ML technique within the International Postgraduate Course Heart Failure Registry for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and Cardiovascular disease and/or RF (PCHF-COVICAV). Methods: Patients from the eight centres with follow-up data available from the PCHF-COVICAV registry were included in this ML analysis (K-medoids algorithm). Results: Out of 617 patients included into the prospective part of the registry, 458 [median age: 76 (IQR: 65–84) years, 55% male] were analyzed and 46 baseline variables, including demographics, clinical status, comorbidities and biochemical characteristics were incorporated into the ML. Three clusters were extracted by this ML method. Cluster 1 (n = 181) represents mainly women with the least number of overall comorbidities and cardiovascular RF. Cluster 2 (n = 227) is characterized mainly by men with non-CV conditions and less severe symptoms of infection. Cluster 3 (n = 50) mainly represents men with the highest prevalence of cardiac comorbidities and RF, more extensive inflammation and organ dysfunction with the highest 6-month all-cause mortality risk. Conclusions: The ML process has identified three important clinical clusters from hospitalized COVID-19 CV and/or RF patients. The cluster of males with severe CV disease, particularly HF, and multiple RF presenting with increased inflammation had a particularly poor outcome. © 2024 Via Medica.