Browsing by Author "Tomic, Slavko (7103046299)"

Background: The external fixation (EF) Ilizarov method, shown to offer efficacy and relative safety, has unique biomechanical properties. Intramedullary nail fixation (IMN) is an advantageous alternative, offering biomechanical stability and a minimally invasive procedure. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in patients undergoing tibia fracture fixation, comparing the Ilizarov EF and IMN methods in an early phase of IMN implementation in Serbia. Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients with radiologically confirmed closed and open (Gustilo and Anderson type I) tibial diaphysis fractures treated at the Institute for Orthopedic Surgery “Banjica’’ from January 2013 to June 2017. The following demographic and clinical data were retrieved: age, sex, chronic disease diagnoses, length of hospital stay, surgical wait times, surgery length, type of anesthesia used, fracture, prophylaxis, mechanism of injury, postsurgical complications, time to recovery, and pain reduction. Pain intensity was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a self-reported scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. Results: A total of 58 IMN patients were compared to 74 patients who underwent Ilizarov EF. Study groups differed in time to recovery (p < 0.001), length of hospitalization (p = 0.007), pain intensity at the fracture site (p < 0.001), and frequency of general anesthesia in favor of intramedullary fixation (p < 0.001). A shorter surgery time (p < 0.001) and less antibiotic use (p < 0.001) were observed when EF was used. Additionally, we identified that the intramedullary fixation was a significant predictor of pain intensity. Conclusions: The IMN method offers faster recovery and reduced pain intensity in comparison to EF, while the length of surgery predicted the occurrence of any complication. © 2024 by the authors.

Background/Aim. Segmental fractures represent com-plex tibial injuries, featuring a unique fracture type that is most commonly caused by high-energy trauma. These fractures are considered to be a treatment challenge for or-thopaedic surgeons due to their sporadic presentation, wide zone of soft tissue injury, and increased rate of com-plications. They are characterized by a highly unstable in-termediary segment and a high rate of open fractures. The method of Ilizarov with its characteristics could offer many advantages over the existing operative techniques. This method, using a percutaneous approach, minimizes the intraoperative trauma and avoids the additional com-promising of the biological environment at the fracture site. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the Ilizarov fixator in the treatment of segmental tibial fractures. Methods. We analyzed 30 patients treated with the Ilizarov fixator between 2012 and 2017. The average age of patients was 36 years (from 24 to 65). The most common mechanism of injury was a road traffic accident. Open fractures were noted in 22 cases. All fractures were reduced using indirect percutaneous techniques with a great focus on achieving the correct length, rotation, and axial alignment of fragments. All patients were advised to bear weight as tolerated from the second postoperative day. Bone healing and functional results were evaluated according to the criteria established by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov. Re-sults. Bone healing was achieved in all patients. The aver-age time to union was 25 weeks (19 to 36 weeks). Bone results were excellent in 23 patients, good in five, and fair in two patients. Functional results were excellent in 22 cases, good in 5, and fair in three cases. Eight patients had minor pin-tract infections, successfully treated with oral antibiotics. Patients were without any major complica-tions. Conclusion. The Ilizarov method is a safe and effi-cient treatment modality for segmental tibial fractures. © 2021 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

No consensus has been reached about the optimal treatment of Jones fractures, especially in elite athletes. Furthermore, only limited experience with external fixation of acute Jones fractures in these patients is available. The aim of the present retrospective study was to report the clinical evaluation of a series of 6 patients-elite athletes-with unilateral acute Jones fracture, who underwent external fixation of the fracture with an Ilizarov minifixator. Treatment success and the intervals to union and the return to full athlete activity were measured for each patient. The mean follow-up duration was 48 (range 24 to 72) months. The average period from surgery to clinical healing of the fracture was 4.1 (range 4.0 to 4.2) weeks, and the interval from surgery to radiographic consolidation of the fracture was 5.8 (range 5.4 to 6.4) weeks. The patients had returned to full athletic activity by 6.7 (range 6.4 to 6.9) weeks postoperatively. No major complications developed. No cases of treatment failure (nonunion, delayed union, or refracture) were observed during the follow-up period. Our results have shown that the Ilizarov external minifixator is a reliable surgical option for the treatment of acute Jones fractures in elite athletes, allowing an early return to full competitive athletic activity. Application of this apparatus is fast and relatively simple, with a percentage of radiographic consolidation and clinical healing comparable to that with screw fixation techniques. © 2013 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

Background: The purpose of this study was to collect all available randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the treatment of open tibial fractures with an external fixator (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. Material and methods: The systematic review was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Review). An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed until 1 March 2023 to identify RCTs which compared either IMN or EF to fix the open tibial fracture. Outcome measures were: postoperative superficial and deep infection, time to union, delayed union, malunion, nonunion and hardware failure. In addition, pain and health-related quality of life were evaluated after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Sixteen publications comprising 1011 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that the IMN technique had a lower postoperative superficial infection and malunion rate (RR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.56–4.95 and RR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.12–3.44, respectively), but higher hardware failure occurrence in contrast to EF (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.13–0.69). No significant differences were found in the union time, delayed union or nonunion rate, and postoperative deep infection rate between the treatments. Lower levels of pain were found in the EF group (RR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02–0.17, p < 0.001). A difference in quality of life favoring IMN after 3 months was found (RR = −0.04, 95%CI = −0.05–0.03, p < 0.001), however, no statistical difference was found after 12 months (RR = 0.03, 95%CI = −0.05–0.11, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Meta-analysis presented reduced incidence rates of superficial infection, malunion, and health-related quality of life 3 months after treatment in IMN. However, EF led to a significant reduction in pain and incidence rate of hardware failure. Postoperative deep infection, delayed union, nonunion and health-related quality of life 12 months following therapy were similar between groups. More high-quality RCTs should be conducted to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. © 2023 by the authors.