Browsing by Author "Todorovic, Dusan (57202724895)"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication PRISM III Score Predicts Short-Term Outcome in Children with ARDS on Conventional and High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation(2023) ;Rsovac, Snezana (8279362900) ;Plavec, Davor (6603896808) ;Todorovic, Dusan (57202724895) ;Lekovic, Aleksa (57789231400) ;Scepanovic, Teja (57194655923) ;Malinic, Marija (58029831700) ;Cobeljic, Mina (57196349878)Milosevic, Katarina (6508374642)Therapeutic recommendations for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) include conventional (CMV) and rescue high-frequency oscillatory mode (HFOV) of mechanical ventilation (MV). The pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) is a frequently used mortality score for critically ill patients. In search of methods to recognize those patients, we analyzed the PRISM III score as a potential predictor of the short-term outcome in MV subjects with PARDS. A retrospective five-year study of PARDS in children on MV was conducted in the Pediatric ICU. Seventy patients were divided into two groups (age group <1 year and age group 1–7 years). The PRISM III score was used to assess the 28-day outcome and possible development of complications. The most common causes of PARDS were pneumonia and sepsis. Male sex, malnourishment, sepsis, and shock were significant indicators of poor outcome. The PRISM III score values were significantly higher in those who died, as well as in subjects requiring HFOV. The score had a significant prognostic value for short-term mortality. There was no significant difference in outcome based on the comparison of two modes of ventilation. A significantly higher score was noted in subjects who developed sepsis and cardiovascular insufficiency. The PRISM III score is a fair outcome predictor during the 28-day follow-up in MV subjects with PARDS, regardless of the ventilation mode. © 2022 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Severe COVID-19 in Non-Smokers: Predictive Factors and Outcomes(2025) ;Djuric, Marko (56467826000) ;Nenadic, Irina (57248341000) ;Radisavljevic, Nina (57201418152) ;Todorovic, Dusan (57202724895) ;Dimic, Nemanja (57460624900) ;Bobos, Marina (59782431600) ;Bojic, Suzana (55965837500) ;Savic, Predrag (57272197000) ;Turnic, Tamara Nikolic (58237706100) ;Stevanovic, Predrag (24315050600)Djukic, Vladimir (57210262273)Background: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed an unexpected pattern known as the “smoker’s paradox”, with lower rates of severe disease among smokers compared to non-smokers, highlighting the need for the specific investigation of disease progression in non-smoking populations. Objective: To identify early mortality predictors in non-smoking patients with severe COVID-19 through the evaluation of clinical, laboratory, and oxygenation parameters. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 59 non-smokers hospitalized with COVID-19 between November and December 2020. Clinical parameters, laboratory findings, and respiratory support requirements were analyzed on Days 1 and 7 of hospitalization. ROC curves were constructed to assess the predictive value of the parameters. Results: The overall mortality rate was 54.2%. The seventh-day SOFA score showed the strongest predictive value (AUC = 0.902, p = 0.004), followed by pCO2 (AUC = 0.853, p = 0.012). Significant differences between survivors and non-survivors were observed in acid–base parameters, oxygenation indices, and hematological markers. Mortality rates varied significantly with ventilation type: 84.6% for IMV and 50% for NIMV, with no deaths in HFNC patients. Conclusions: Multiple parameters measured on Day 7 of hospitalization demonstrate significant predictive value for mortality in non-smoking COVID-19 patients, with the SOFA score being the strongest predictor. The type of respiratory support significantly influences outcomes, suggesting the importance of careful ventilation strategy selection. © 2025 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Severe COVID-19 in Non-Smokers: Predictive Factors and Outcomes(2025) ;Djuric, Marko (56467826000) ;Nenadic, Irina (57248341000) ;Radisavljevic, Nina (57201418152) ;Todorovic, Dusan (57202724895) ;Dimic, Nemanja (57460624900) ;Bobos, Marina (59782431600) ;Bojic, Suzana (55965837500) ;Savic, Predrag (57272197000) ;Turnic, Tamara Nikolic (58237706100) ;Stevanovic, Predrag (24315050600)Djukic, Vladimir (57210262273)Background: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed an unexpected pattern known as the “smoker’s paradox”, with lower rates of severe disease among smokers compared to non-smokers, highlighting the need for the specific investigation of disease progression in non-smoking populations. Objective: To identify early mortality predictors in non-smoking patients with severe COVID-19 through the evaluation of clinical, laboratory, and oxygenation parameters. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 59 non-smokers hospitalized with COVID-19 between November and December 2020. Clinical parameters, laboratory findings, and respiratory support requirements were analyzed on Days 1 and 7 of hospitalization. ROC curves were constructed to assess the predictive value of the parameters. Results: The overall mortality rate was 54.2%. The seventh-day SOFA score showed the strongest predictive value (AUC = 0.902, p = 0.004), followed by pCO2 (AUC = 0.853, p = 0.012). Significant differences between survivors and non-survivors were observed in acid–base parameters, oxygenation indices, and hematological markers. Mortality rates varied significantly with ventilation type: 84.6% for IMV and 50% for NIMV, with no deaths in HFNC patients. Conclusions: Multiple parameters measured on Day 7 of hospitalization demonstrate significant predictive value for mortality in non-smoking COVID-19 patients, with the SOFA score being the strongest predictor. The type of respiratory support significantly influences outcomes, suggesting the importance of careful ventilation strategy selection. © 2025 by the authors.