Browsing by Author "Tošković, Oliver (28867554600)"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Burnout syndrome among physicians - The role of personality dimensions and coping strategies(2011) ;Pejušković, Bojana (57212194956) ;Lečić-Toševski, Dušica (6602315043) ;Priebe, Stefan (8115293800)Tošković, Oliver (28867554600)Background: Burnout syndrome (BS) and stress-related disorders are frequent among medical specialists, but it has been suggested that some health workers are more prone to the BS than others. This study assessed the intensity of the BS among 3 groups of physicians: psychiatrists, general practitioners and surgeons and examined correlation both between the intensity of BS and physicians' personality dimensions as well as between the level of BS and stress coping strategies. Subjects and methods: The sample consisted of 160 physicians (70 general practitioners, 50 psychiatrists, 40 surgeons). The assessment was carried out by the Maslach Burnout Inventory, The Temperament and Character Inventory and Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Results: Dimension of emotional exhaustion was the most prominent in general practitioners (F=5.546, df1=2, df2=156, p<0.01), while dimension of depersonalization was highest in surgeons (F=15.314, df1=2, df2=156, p<0.01), as well as lack of personal accomplishment (F=16.079, df1=2, df2=156, p<0.01). We found that the Harm Avoidance has lead to development of BS while Self-directedness and Cooperativeness were prominent in physicians with low level of BS. The escape-avoidance was in correlation with high depersonalization and lack of personal accomplishment while self-control was prominent in physicians with lower BS. Conclusion: The BS affects personal well-being and professional performance. It is important to identify individuals with a tendency towards its development, in order to undertake preventive measures such as stress management and improvement of the stress coping strategies. © Medicinska naklada. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Depression and distress in couples with infertility – Who suffers more?(2023) ;Pejušković, Bojana (57212194956) ;Tošković, Oliver (28867554600) ;Ivanišević, Milica (58884474200) ;Lero, Marija (58884047500)Durutović, Otaš (6506011266)Introduction/Objective Infertility is the inability to achieve pregnancy after a year or more of unpro-tected sexual intercourse. It is a clinical and social issue affecting both sexes. Infertility can cause anxiety, depression, and personal distress with long-lasting consequences. Men and women tend to cope with infertility in different ways and reliance on certain coping mechanisms can be harmful. This study aims to examine the correlative effects of infertility, distress and depression among couples, and investigate sex disparities in levels of suffering. Methods The research is a cross-sectional study that included 168 participants (84 couples) divided into two groups, control and infertility group. Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were used to identify and assess psychological symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS at the 0.05 level of significance. Results The results showed that there was a significant difference in the scores on BDI and BSI scales between the infertile and fertile groups, with participants in the infertile group reporting higher levels of depression and distress (t =-2.724, df = 166, p < 0.01; t =-3.609, df = 166, p < 0.01). Women had significantly higher scores on the depression scale than men (t =-2.079, df = 166, p < 0.05). Conclusion In summary, the study found that couples dealing with infertility experience higher levels of distress and depression compared to the control group. Women in these couples are particularly vulnerable to depression. The study highlights the importance of addressing the mental health needs of individuals and couples dealing with infertility, in addition to treating the underlying medical issues. © 2023, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Depressive, anxious and somatization symptoms and quality of life in stress-related disorders; [Depresivni, anksiozni i somatizacioni simptomi i kvalitet života u poremećajima povezanim sa stresom](2017) ;Čolović, Olga (28767556200) ;Lečić-Toševski, Dušica (6602315043) ;Mandić-Maravić, Vanja (56663255900)Tošković, Oliver (28867554600)Background/Aim. Recent studies have shown a significant relation of the post-traumatic stress disorder and impairment of quality of life. The research on the relations of other stressrelated disorders and quality of life is scarce. The aim of this research was to determine which symptoms within the stressrelated disorders (depressive, anxious and somatization) have the strongest effect on the quality of life decrease. Methods. The study group comprised 80 subjects who have developed a certain stress-related disorder. The diagnosis was made based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria. Manchester Short Assessment Quality of Life Scale (MANSA) and Symptom Check List-90 Revised (SCL-90-R) were administered. Results. The presence of all three types of symptoms (depressive, anxious or somatization) was in negative correlation with the quality of life, contributing to the variation of quality of life with 40%. Depressive symptoms had the greatest impact on the quality of life impairment. Conclusion. When it comes to stress-related disorders, the quality of life is mostly impaired by depressive symptoms. Target therapeutic interventions aimed at depressive symptoms might have a significant effect on the quality of life improvement in the person who developed stress-related disorders. © 2017, Institut za Vojnomedicinske Naucne Informacije/Documentaciju. All Rights Reserved. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Determinants of quality of life in people with epilepsy in Serbia(2014) ;Milovanović, Maja (57198020720) ;Martinović, Žarko (7003683694)Tošković, Oliver (28867554600)Purpose: This study aimed at finding determinants of quality of life in people with epilepsy (PWE) living in Belgrade, Serbia. Method: In this study, we recruited consecutive adults with epilepsy attending our outpatient department. Adult patients (age range: 18-65. years) of normal intelligence and without any progressive neurological disease or psychiatric disorder were included in the study. They completed the following questionnaires: QOLIE-31 Inventory (Serbian version), Beck's Depression Inventory-II, Beck's Anxiety Inventory, Symptom Check List-90, and Neurotoxicity Scale-II. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the predictive effects of some factors on QOLIE-31 Inventory. Results: The mean QOLIE-31 score of 203 patients who completed the questionnaires was 70.64 ± 17.74. Sociodemographic factors (age, sex, education, and employment) did not significantly predict QOLIE-31 score. Significant determinants of quality of life were clinical characteristics - seizure severity and etiology of epilepsy - accounting for 30.9% of the variance, depressive and anxiety symptoms accounting for 42.8% of the variance, and cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs, accounting for 1.5% above other variables. Conclusions: The results suggest that seizure severity and etiology of epilepsy, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and cognitive adverse medication effects are main determinants of quality of life in this population of PWE. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Determinants of quality of life in people with epilepsy in Serbia(2014) ;Milovanović, Maja (57198020720) ;Martinović, Žarko (7003683694)Tošković, Oliver (28867554600)Purpose: This study aimed at finding determinants of quality of life in people with epilepsy (PWE) living in Belgrade, Serbia. Method: In this study, we recruited consecutive adults with epilepsy attending our outpatient department. Adult patients (age range: 18-65. years) of normal intelligence and without any progressive neurological disease or psychiatric disorder were included in the study. They completed the following questionnaires: QOLIE-31 Inventory (Serbian version), Beck's Depression Inventory-II, Beck's Anxiety Inventory, Symptom Check List-90, and Neurotoxicity Scale-II. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the predictive effects of some factors on QOLIE-31 Inventory. Results: The mean QOLIE-31 score of 203 patients who completed the questionnaires was 70.64 ± 17.74. Sociodemographic factors (age, sex, education, and employment) did not significantly predict QOLIE-31 score. Significant determinants of quality of life were clinical characteristics - seizure severity and etiology of epilepsy - accounting for 30.9% of the variance, depressive and anxiety symptoms accounting for 42.8% of the variance, and cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs, accounting for 1.5% above other variables. Conclusions: The results suggest that seizure severity and etiology of epilepsy, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and cognitive adverse medication effects are main determinants of quality of life in this population of PWE. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Mental health in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Protocol for a nationally representative multilevel survey in Serbia(2021) ;Marić, Nadja P (57226219191) ;Lazarević, Ljiljana B (24481691500) ;Mihić, Ljiljana (21734952100) ;Pejovic Milovancevic, Milica (57218683898) ;Terzić, Zorica (57202914665) ;Tošković, Oliver (28867554600) ;Todorović, Jovana (7003376825) ;Vuković, Olivera (14044368800)Knezevic, Goran (57201607844)Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have a prolonged impact on mental health (MH); however, the long-term MH effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown. The Serbian national survey-CoV2Soul.RS-was launched to document the MH status of the Serbian population following the COVID-19 pandemic and to contribute to an international evidence base about MH prevalence rates during different phases of the pandemic. Methods and analysis This cross-sectional study was designed to collect a nationally representative sample (N=1200; age 18-65 years; estimated start/end-June/November 2021) using multistage probabilistic household sampling. Trained staff will conduct in-person diagnostic interviews. A battery of self-report instruments will be administered to assess the quality of life (QoL), general distress and associated protective and harmful psychological and societal factors. Analyses will be conducted to delineate the prevalence rates of MH disorders, how MH conditions and QoL vary with respect to sociodemographic variables, personality, health status and traumatic events during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to test how these relations depend on geographical region. Moreover, this study was designed to explore mechanisms linking personality and the perception of pandemic consequences and associated distress. Prevalence rates of MH disorders will be calculated using descriptive statistics. For additional analyses, we will use correlations, analysis of variance and regression analyses. The hierarchical structure of the data will be explored using multilevel random coefficient modelling. Structural equation modelling will be used to investigate the indirect effects of personality on distress through relevant variables. Ethics and dissemination Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Medicine (1322-VII/31) and Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade (02-33/273) and Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad (05-27, br.893/1) approved the protocol. Only respondents able to provide informed consent will participate in the study. Research reports will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and the results will be placed on the website www.cov2soul.rs to be available to funders, researchers, policy-makers and interested laypeople, and will be advertised through social media. Trial registration number NCT04896983. © - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication The impact of socioeconomic factors on quality of life and functional impairment in patients treated for oropharyngeal carcinoma(2019) ;Milovanović, Jovica (6603250148) ;Andrejić, Dragoslava (13609301600) ;Jotić, Ana (35173257500) ;Djukić, Vojko (6701658274) ;Tošković, Oliver (28867554600) ;Savić-Vujović, Katarina (56362541300) ;Pavlović, Bojan (8212822900) ;Stojković, Goran (59498807300) ;Banko, Bojan (35809871900) ;Milovanović, Andjela (57213394852)Artiko, Vera (55887737000)Backround/Aim: Considering the distinct increase in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer over oral cavity cancers and changing epidemiology with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection emerging as an important risk factor, there is a need to establish better treatment choices in specific groups of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and functional performance and the impact of different demographical data, stage of disease, and treatment type on these parameters in patients with oropharyngeal cancer with successfully achieved locoregional control a year after the treatment. Methods: Study included 87 patients who underwent QOL and functional impairment assessment 12 to 14 months after finished oncological treatment with the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of Life-Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of-Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Results: Specific groups of patients had significantly different post-treatment QOL scores. The factors associated with the worse QOL scores were female gender, not being in a partnership, level of education and HPV status. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider socioeconomic factors and HPV status in planning the recovery after treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Gender, education level and employment are the variables that form a certain risk profiles associated with the lower QOL. © 2019 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.
