Browsing by Author "Subotic, Dragan (6603099376)"

[No abstract available]

Training of European thoracic surgeons is subject to huge variations in terms of length of training, content of training and operative experience during training. Harmonization of training outcomes has been approached by creating the European Board of Thoracic Surgery, which has been accredited by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS); however, a clear description of the content of training is lacking. Building on their recognized experience with curriculum building, task forces of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgery agreed on a joint task force on training in thoracic surgery. The goal of this study is to report on the mission statement developed from the UEMS-driven survey, describe the Delphi method and the observed results and present the first large consensus-based syllabus. The working group is currently working on a description of the curriculum and assessment of learning outcomes. © The Author(s) 2018.

[No abstract available]

Background: The preoperative selection of patients with lung cancer recurrence remains a major clinical challenge. Several aspects of this kind of surgery are still insufficiently evidence-based, with only a few series with more than 50 patients. Methods: A retrospective study on 29 patients who underwent a completion pneumonectomy for postoperative lung cancer recurrence or new primary was done in the period between October 2004 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria include complete (R0) first and second resections, histologically proven recurrent or new malignancy, complete pathohistological report after both operations, and exact data about the treatment outcome at the time of the last contact with patients or their families. Results: There were 25 (86.2%) males and 4 (13.8%) females (M:F 6.2:1). In 13/29 patients, the interval between the first and second operations was less than 2 years, while in the remaining 16 patients, it was longer than 2 years. Concerning the operative stage distribution, stage I was more frequent after the first operation (44.8 vs. 22%), while stage III was dominant after the second operation (40.7 vs. 10.3%). The same tumor histology after the first and second operations existed in 24 (82.8%) patients. Adjuvant treatment was given to 53.6% of patients after the first and to 45.5% of patients after the second operation. The overall 5-year survival was 30%, median survival being 35±16.9 months (1.896, 68.104 95% CI). A median survival of patients in post-surgery stage I after re-do surgery was better in comparison with that in higher stages (35±22.6 vs.17.2±15.1 vs. 21±6.7 months, p>0.05). Patients with the same tumor type at both operations lived significantly longer (median survival 48±21.5 vs. 7.7±1.9 months) than patients with different tumor histology after the second operation. Patients under 60 years (42.9%) lived longer than patients older than 60 years (median survival 69±4.5 vs. 17.2±14.3 months). The Cox regression analysis revealed only the disease stage at first operation and the same/different tumor histology as significant prognostic factors. One patient died from cardiac insufficiency caused by bronchopleural fistula (3.4% operative mortality). Operative morbidity was 34.4%. Conclusion: Completion pneumonectomy may be a reasonable option for postoperative lung cancer recurrence or new primaries only in carefully selected patients, in whom the potential oncological benefits overweigh the surgical risk. © 2018 The Author(s).

Influence of physiotherapy on the outcome of the lung resection is still controversial. Study aim was to assess the influence of physiotherapy program on postoperative lung function and effort tolerance in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy. The prospective study included 56 COPD patients who underwent lung resection for primary non small-cell lung cancer after previous physiotherapy (Group A) and 47 COPD patients (Group B) without physiotherapy before lung cancer surgery. In Group A, lung function and effort tolerance on admission were compared with the same parameters after preoperative physiotherapy. Both groups were compared in relation to lung function, effort tolerance and symptoms change after resection. In patients with tumors requiring a lobectomy, after preoperative physiotherapy, a highly significant increase in FEV1, VC, FEF50 and FEF25 of 20%, 17%, 18% and 16% respectively was registered with respect to baseline values. After physiotherapy, a significant improvement in 6-minute walking distance was achieved. After lung resection, the significant loss of FEV1 and VC occurred, together with significant worsening of the small airways function, effort tolerance and symptomatic status. After the surgery, a clear tendency existed towards smaller FEV1 loss in patients with moderate to severe, when compared to patients with mild baseline lung function impairment. A better FEV1 improvement was associated with more significant loss in FEV1. Physiotherapy represents an important part of preoperative and postoperative treatment in COPD patients undergoing a lung resection for primary lung cancer.

Influence of physiotherapy on the outcome of the lung resection is still controversial. Study aim was to assess the influence of physiotherapy program on postoperative lung function and effort tolerance in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy. The prospective study included 56 COPD patients who underwent lung resection for primary non small-cell lung cancer after previous physiotherapy (Group A) and 47 COPD patients (Group B) without physiotherapy before lung cancer surgery. In Group A, lung function and effort tolerance on admission were compared with the same parameters after preoperative physiotherapy. Both groups were compared in relation to lung function, effort tolerance and symptoms change after resection. In patients with tumors requiring a lobectomy, after preoperative physiotherapy, a highly significant increase in FEV1, VC, FEF50 and FEF25 of 20%, 17%, 18% and 16% respectively was registered with respect to baseline values. After physiotherapy, a significant improvement in 6-minute walking distance was achieved. After lung resection, the significant loss of FEV1 and VC occurred, together with significant worsening of the small airways function, effort tolerance and symptomatic status. After the surgery, a clear tendency existed towards smaller FEV1 loss in patients with moderate to severe, when compared to patients with mild baseline lung function impairment. A better FEV1 improvement was associated with more significant loss in FEV1. Physiotherapy represents an important part of preoperative and postoperative treatment in COPD patients undergoing a lung resection for primary lung cancer.

[No abstract available]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) on preoperative clinical status changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and net effects of PPR and cancer resection on residual pulmonary function and functional capacity. Material and methods: This prospective single group study included 83 COPD patients (62 ±8 years, 85% males, FEV1 = 1844 ±618 ml, Tiffeneau index = 54 ±9%) with NSCLC, on 2-4-week PPR, before resection. Pulmonary function, and functional and symptom status were evaluated by spirometry, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and Borg scale, on admission, after PPR and after surgery. Results: Following PPR significant improvement was registered in the majority of spirometry parameters (FEV1 by 374 ml, p < 0.001; VLC by 407 ml, p < 0.001; FEF50 by 3%, p = 0.003), 6MWD (for 56 m, p < 0.001) and dyspnoeal symptoms (by 1.0 Borg unit, p < 0.001). A positive correlation was identified between preoperative increments of FEV1 and 6MWD (rs = 0.503, p = 0.001). Negative correlations were found between basal FEV1 and its percentage increment (rs = -0.479, p = 0.001) and between basal 6MWD and its percentage change (rs = -0.603, p < 0.001) during PPR. Compared to basal values, after resection a significant reduction of most spirometry parameters and 6MWD were recorded, while Tiffeneau index, FEF25 and dyspnoea severity remained stable (p = NS). Conclusions: Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances clinical status of COPD patients before NSCLC resection. Preoperative increase of exercise tolerance was the result of pulmonary function improvement during PPR. The beneficial effects of PPR were most emphasized in patients with initially the worst pulmonary function and the weakest functional capacity.

[No abstract available]

Background: It is still not clear whether an intrapericardial pneumonectomy indicates a more advanced stage of the disease compared to a standard pneumonectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 164 patients who underwent a pneumonectomy for lung cancer. The first group consisted of 82 patients who had a standard pneumonectomy and the second group was 38 patients who had a intrapericardial pneumonectomy, for both groups in the latest 5-year period. The third group was 44 patients with had a sleeve pneumonectomy in the latest 10-year period. The groups were compared in relation to the overall and stage-related survival, influence of T and N factors, operative morbidity and mortality. The statistics used were Kaplan-Meier, U-test, t-test, χ2 test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in stage distribution between standard and intrapericardial pneumonectomies; stages I, II, IIIA and IIIB occurred for 10.9% vs 2.6%, 30.5% vs 26.3%, 46.4% vs 65.8% and 12.2% vs 5.3% of patients, respectively. For patients who had a sleeve pneumonectomy, stage IIIA was significantly more frequent. Although the overall survival (63.5% vs 57.6%) and stage-related 5-year survival were better in the first compared to the second group, especially for stage IIIA (58.6% vs 42.6%), these differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in operative morbidity and mortality between groups 1 and 2, but both were significantly higher in the third group (35.7% and 15.9%). Conclusions: An intrapericardial pneumonectomy does not always indicate a more advanced stage of the disease. The need for an intrapericardial pneumonectomy, either established preoperatively or during the operation, as a single factor, even for marginal surgical candidates, is not strong enough to reject these patients for surgery. © 2014 Subotic et al.

The role of surgery for the treatment of the localised form of bronchiectasis has changed with the development of more effective antibiotics and conservative treatment options, such as embolisation or effective novel anti-inflammatory treatment approaches in subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis, as suggested recently. However, surgery is the only option for a potential cure for certain patients with bronchiectasis. Complete resection of bronchiectasis should be intended with the preservation of as much lung function as possible. Incomplete resection is often used for the palliative treatment of life-threatening symptoms, e.g. major haemoptysis. The usual clinical problems in patients undergoing surgery for bronchiectasis are bilateral bronchiectasis, haemoptysis and previous pleural empyema. The outcome for surgical treatment is good, with a low operative mortality and morbidity rate; however, higher than reported for non-infectious pathology. Complications of surgery usually range between 10% and 25% and largely consist of a prolonged air leak, bleeding, empyema and/or respiratory failure. In most series, lobectomy is the commonest type of resection with a rate of approximately 60%. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary resection has become an established alternative approach to conventional open surgery for selected patients. The educational aim of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of the possible solutions to the most frequent practical problems encountered by patients who have a localised form of bronchiectasis and are being considered for surgical treatment. © ERS 2013.

Background: Although survival analyses represent one of the cornerstones in oncology in general, some aspects of the reported survival data in lung cancer patients are still not fully elucidated. Methods: After having defined several open questions, an evidence based approach was applied in order to answer these questions. Areas of interest were: (I) possible uncertainties in reported survival data; (II) survival surrogates; (III) recommended methods for evaluating progression free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint in future datasets; (IV) postoperative lung cancer recurrence and survival. Results: In recent years, PFS has seen increasing use as a primary endpoint, particularly in phase II trials. This article focuses on the statistical aspects, and particularly on evaluating the ability of PFS to accurately predict the overall survival (OS) outcome. If the data are available from randomized trials, then the evaluation of trial level surrogacy should be carried out, in addition to the methods described in the paper. If it is not a case, the patient-level methods should be applied. Suggestions for "landmark analysis" are also given: (I) classify your cases according to progression status (progressed, progression-free, or unknown) at one or more time points of interest; (II) perform a separate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for each time point; (III) determine and report the landmark time point where progression status best predicts survival according to the hazard ratios and P values; (IV) calculate the concordance index for each landmark analysis model. The concordance index (or "c-Index") is essentially the probability that for any two randomly selected cases, the case that is predicted to have the worst outcome, does in fact have the worst outcome. Conclusions: the widening spectrum of diagnostic and treatment in pulmonary oncology imposes the need for an updated knowledge about statistical method that would fit best for the analysed problem. © Journal of Thoracic Disease.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to assess diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m depreotide and Tc-99m-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy for evaluation of pulmonary lesions that appeared ambiguous on computed tomography (CT). Material and Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients (37 men and 12 women; mean age, 60 ± 11 years) with 60 pulmonary lesions on chest radiography and CT were referred for nuclear imaging. They were prospectively allocated to undergo whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using either Tc-99m depreotide (26 patients, group 1) or Tc-99m-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC imaging (23 patients, group 2). Histologic findings after tissue biopsy served as a gold standard for determining diagnostic accuracy of the 2 somatostatin analogs. Visual assessment was complemented by semiquantitative analysis based on target to background ratio. Results: Among the 32 pulmonary lesions scanned with Tc-99m depreotide, focal uptake was increased in 22 of 25 malignancies, whereas no uptake was found in 6 of 7 benign lesions (88% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 88% accuracy) on both WBS and SPECT. Imaging of 28 pulmonary lesions with Tc-99m-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC had a similar diagnostic yield (sensitivity 87%, specificity 84%, and accuracy 86%). Overall, target to background ratios were higher on SPECT than WBS but not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (SPECT 2.72 ± 0.70 vs. 2.71 ± 0.50, WBS 1.61 ± 0.32 vs. 1.62 ± 0.28, respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that Tc-99m depreotide and Tc-99m-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC have similar diagnostic value for characterizing pulmonary lesions that appear ambiguous on CT. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.