Browsing by Author "Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400)"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based comparison and validation study of multiple models(2023) ;Jelicic, Jelena (56180044800) ;Juul-Jensen, Karen (57218352166) ;Bukumiric, Zoran (36600111200) ;Roost Clausen, Michael (58039350000) ;Ludvigsen Al-Mashhadi, Ahmed (57189056494) ;Pedersen, Robert Schou (57200904293) ;Poulsen, Christian Bjørn (8773152900) ;Brown, Peter (56437846200) ;El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer (22634515900)Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400)Currently, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most used and reported model for prognostication in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). IPI-like variations have been proposed, but only a few have been validated in different populations (e.g., revised IPI (R-IPI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI)). We aimed to validate and compare different IPI-like variations to identify the model with the highest predictive accuracy for survival in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. We included 5126 DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy with available data required by 13 different prognostic models. All models could predict survival, but NCCN-IPI consistently provided high levels of accuracy. Moreover, we found similar 5-year overall survivals in the high-risk group (33.4%) compared to the original validation study of NCCN-IPI. Additionally, only one model incorporating albumin performed similarly well but did not outperform NCCN-IPI regarding discrimination (c-index 0.693). Poor fit, discrimination, and calibration were observed in models with only three risk groups and without age as a risk factor. In this extensive retrospective registry-based study comparing 13 prognostic models, we suggest that NCCN-IPI should be reported as the reference model along with IPI in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients until more accurate validated prognostic models for DLBCL become available. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, Springer Nature Limited. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prognostic models in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients: A systematic review(2021) ;Jelicic, Jelena (56180044800) ;Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400) ;Bukumiric, Zoran (36600111200) ;Juul-Jensen, Karen (57218352166)Andjelic, Bosko (6507067141)Over the last decade, several prognostic models have been proposed for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), but consensus on the optimal model for these patients is absent or lacking. This study aims to review available prognostic models for PCNSL and discuss their prognostic features. A comprehensive literature search performed in Pubmed/Embase identified ten studies with a variable number of analysed patients (range 32–3453), which proposed 12 prognostic models. Age and performance status were the most important prognostic factors in PCNSL and an integral part of the majority of the proposed models. However, there is no universally accepted prognostic model for PCNSL owning to a number of limitations such as a small number of patients, limited samples obtained for genetic analysis, retrospective nature of studies, single centre studies, and lack of validation. Future multicentre studies are necessary to determine the optimal prognostic model for PCNSL by combining different prognostic markers of significance. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication The clinical applicability of current prognostic models in follicular lymphoma: A systematic review(2021) ;Jelicic, Jelena (56180044800) ;Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400) ;Bukumiric, Zoran (36600111200)Andjelic, Bosko (6507067141)The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) is widely used for risk stratification of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Motivated by evolvement in treatment modalities, several prognostic models for FL have been proposed recently. This systematic review aimed to identify available prognostic models for newly diagnosed FL and discuss their potential limitations. A total of ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Different clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histopathological findings were combined in prognostic models. The majority of studies developed models from clinical trial cohorts, and most lacked validation in populations treated with current treatment options. Although the FLIPI is the most widely used model for prognostication in FL patients, current prognostic models, including FLIPI, are rarely used in clinical practice for treatment decision-making. Future studies should validate the existing, or develop new prognostic models, to identify which of the current standard treatment options benefit high-risk FL patients the most. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Validation of prognostic models in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a real-world nationwide population-based study – development of a clinical nomogram(2025) ;Jelicic, Jelena (56180044800) ;Juul-Jensen, Karen (57218352166) ;Bukumiric, Zoran (36600111200) ;Runason Simonsen, Mikkel (59177988400) ;Kragh Jørgensen, Rasmus Rask (58838186100) ;Roost Clausen, Michael (58039350000) ;Ludvigsen Al-Mashhadi, Ahmed (57189056494) ;Schou Pedersen, Robert (59178141900) ;Bjørn Poulsen, Christian (59177988500) ;Ortved Gang, Anne (58039201900) ;Brown, Peter (56437846200) ;El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer (22634515900)Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400)The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most frequently used tool for prognostication in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of all ages. This study validated and compared six models developed for patients above 60 with International Prognostic Indices (IPI, R-IPI, NCCN-IPI). Moreover, we created a clinical nomogram with an online tool for individualized predictions. A total of 2,835 patients aged over 60 with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with potentially curative immunochemotherapy were identified in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. A nomogram was developed by combining NCCN-IPI variables (excluding extranodal localization), albumin, and platelet levels in 1,970 patients and verified the results in the remaining 956 patients. Compared to other models, the elderly IPI (E-IPI) and age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) showed better accuracy and discriminatory ability. However, the models failed to identify a high-risk group with a 3-year overall survival rate below 40%. Our nomogram-based model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability and provided more precise individual predictions than all other models based on a risk stratification system. Most clinical prognostic models fail to accurately predict patient outcomes in patients over 60 years old. Therefore, nomogram-based models should be considered in this population to prevent information loss due to variable dichotomization. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
