Browsing by Author "Stanković-Popović, Verica (24399947500)"

Increased peritoneal protein loss has been associated with the fast transport of small molecules, diabetes mellitus (DM), and a reduced survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), although some studies did not confirm the association with survival. In this single-center retrospective study, we investigated the relationship of baseline peritoneal albumin and protein loss with transport status, comorbidities including DM, and survival in 106 incident PD patients during the period of July 2005–June 2014. Five-year survival rate was determined using Cox-regression analysis. There were not significant differences in D/Pcr or peritoneal protein and albumin loss between diabetics and non-diabetics. In the group of 66 non-diabetics, high and high-average transporters for creatinine had higher values for both peritoneal protein (11.85 ± 6.77 vs. 7.85 ± 4.36 g/day; p = 0.002) and albumin (5.03 ± 2.32 vs. 3.72 ± 1.54 g/day; p = 0.016) loss as compared to slow transporters. However, in the group of 40 diabetics, this association was not observed. Upon multivariable regression analysis, the independent association of D/PCr with peritoneal albumin (β = 0.313; p = 0.008) and protein (β = 0.441; p = 0.001) loss was found only in non-diabetics in whom ultrafiltration also appeared as a significant predictor of peritoneal protein loss (β = 0.330; p = 0.000). A high comorbidity grade, older age, and low serum albumin were associated with mortality, but both peritoneal protein and albumin loss as well as D/Pcr were not determinants of survival. Baseline peritoneal protein and albumin loss was not associated with DM and did not predict survival. The clinical significance of the absence of association between fast peritoneal transport status and peritoneal protein flux in diabetics should be evaluated in a prospective study comprising a greater number of diabetics with evaluation of overhydration as a main inducing variable of protein leak. © 2023 by the authors.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Liver Disease (MASLD) represents a spectrum of conditions from simple fat accumulation to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The possible role of the intestinal microbiome on MASLD development has been in focus. Our study aimed to examine the effects of synbiotics on the liver steatosis, inflammation, and stool microbiome. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted involving 84 MASLD patients, defined by an elastometric attenuation coefficient (ATT) greater than 0.63 dB/cm/MHz with an alanine aminotransferase level above 40 U/L for men and 35 U/L for women. The patients were divided into an intervention group treated with a synbiotic with 64x109 CFU of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and 6.4g of inulin and a control group treated with a placebo. RESULTS: Using synbiotics for 12 weeks significantly decreased liver steatosis (ΔATT -0.006±0.023 vs -0.016±0.021 dB/cm/MHz, p=0.046). The group of patients treated with synbiotics showed a significant decrease in the level of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (Δhs-CRP 0 vs -0.7 mg/L, p≤0.001). Synbiotics enriched the microbiome of patients in the intervention group with the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Streptococcus, by 81%, 55%, 51%, and 40%, respectively, with a reduction of Ruminococcus and Enterobacterium by 35% and 40%. Synbiotic treatment significantly shortened the gut transition time (ΔGTT -5h vs. -10h, p=0.031). CONCLUSION: Synbiotics could be an effective and safe option that could have place in MASLD treatment. © 2024 Miloš Mitrović et al., published by Sciendo.

Objective: Altering dysbiotic gut flora through synbiotic supplementation has recently been recognized as a potential treatment strategy to reduce the levels of gut-derived uremic toxins and decrease inflammation. Assessing its efficacy and safety has been the main goal of our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods: A total of 34 nondialyzed chronic kidney disease patients, aged ≥18 years, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 15 and 45 mL/minute, were randomized either to an intervention group (n = 17), receiving synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium lactis, 32 billion colony forming units per day plus 3.2 g of inulin), or control group (n = 17), receiving placebo during 12 weeks. The impact of treatment on the dynamic of serum levels of gut-derived uremic toxins, total serum indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, and trimethylamine N-oxide, was defined as the primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcomes included changes in the stool microbiome, serum interleukin-6 levels, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, diet, gastrointestinal symptom dynamics, and safety. Serum levels of uremic toxins were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography. The stool microbiome analysis was performed using the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing approach. Results: Synbiotic treatment significantly modified gut microbiome with Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, and Subdoligranulum genera enrichment and consequently reduced serum level of indoxyl sulfate (ΔIS –21.5% vs. 5.3%, P < .001), improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR 12% vs. 8%, P = .029), and decreased level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (–39.5 vs. –8.5%, P < .001) in treated patients. Two patients of the intervention arm complained of increased flatulence. No other safety issues were noted. Conclusion: Synbiotics could be available, safe, and an effective therapeutic strategy we could use in daily practice in order to decrease levels of uremic toxins and microinflammation in chronic kidney disease patients. © 2022 The Authors

Objective: Altering dysbiotic gut flora through synbiotic supplementation has recently been recognized as a potential treatment strategy to reduce the levels of gut-derived uremic toxins and decrease inflammation. Assessing its efficacy and safety has been the main goal of our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods: A total of 34 nondialyzed chronic kidney disease patients, aged ≥18 years, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 15 and 45 mL/minute, were randomized either to an intervention group (n = 17), receiving synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium lactis, 32 billion colony forming units per day plus 3.2 g of inulin), or control group (n = 17), receiving placebo during 12 weeks. The impact of treatment on the dynamic of serum levels of gut-derived uremic toxins, total serum indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, and trimethylamine N-oxide, was defined as the primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcomes included changes in the stool microbiome, serum interleukin-6 levels, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, diet, gastrointestinal symptom dynamics, and safety. Serum levels of uremic toxins were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography. The stool microbiome analysis was performed using the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing approach. Results: Synbiotic treatment significantly modified gut microbiome with Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, and Subdoligranulum genera enrichment and consequently reduced serum level of indoxyl sulfate (ΔIS –21.5% vs. 5.3%, P < .001), improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR 12% vs. 8%, P = .029), and decreased level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (–39.5 vs. –8.5%, P < .001) in treated patients. Two patients of the intervention arm complained of increased flatulence. No other safety issues were noted. Conclusion: Synbiotics could be available, safe, and an effective therapeutic strategy we could use in daily practice in order to decrease levels of uremic toxins and microinflammation in chronic kidney disease patients. © 2022 The Authors