Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Stanimirović, Aleksandar (57215793610)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Pineal Tumor Surgery—The Choice of the Approach Related to Tumor Characteristics and Posterior Fossa Anatomy
    (2024)
    Milisavljević, Filip (57219123239)
    ;
    Ilić, Rosanda (56688276500)
    ;
    Bogdanović, Ivan (55376410100)
    ;
    Milin-Lazović, Jelena (57023980700)
    ;
    Miljković, Aleksandar (54899611800)
    ;
    Milićević, Mihailo (57219130278)
    ;
    Šćepanović, Vuk (55375352900)
    ;
    Stanimirović, Aleksandar (57215793610)
    ;
    Nastasović, Tijana (57195950910)
    ;
    Lazić, Igor (57209263230)
    ;
    Jovanović, Marija (57194767566)
    ;
    Grujičić, Danica (7004438060)
    Objective: This research aimed to determine whether an adequate surgical approach can be chosen based on clearly defined values of anatomical landmarks (tentorial angle) and tumor size and extension. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients operated on because of pineal tumors. The cohort was divided depending on the surgical approach. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, we measured maximal diameters, tumor volume, and tumor propagation. In the group of patients operated with the supracerebellar infratentorial approach, we also tested the correlation of tentorial angle with residual tumor. Differences among groups in resection, complications rate, and outcome were tested by the χ2 test. Finally, in both groups, the correlation of residual tumor with tumor volume, propagation, and diameters was tested using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: In the group operated with a supracerebellar approach, total resection was achieved in 78% of the patients. The critical value of cranio-caudal diameter correlated with tumor residue was 31 mm, for lateral-lateral diameter 25 mm, for the lateral extension 14 mm, and tumor volume 12 cm3. Tentorial angle did not influence the extent of the resection. In the group operated with an occipital transtentorial approach, the critical tumor volume related to tumor residue was 9 mm3, anterior-posterior diameter 29 mm, and cranio-caudal diameter 28 mm. The extent of the resection was significantly higher in the supracerebellar group. Conclusions: In both approaches, tumors larger than 3 cm show an increased risk of subtotal resection. Except when most tumor volume is localized above the venous system, we advocate a supracerebellar corridor as an effective approach that is not limited by tentorial angle. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Reconstruction of Moderately and Severely Atrophic Scalp—A Multicentric Experience in Surgical Treatment of Patients Irradiated for Tinea Capitis in Childhood and Surgical Algorithm
    (2023)
    Nikolić Živanović, Maja (57555166000)
    ;
    Jurišić, Milana (58220269500)
    ;
    Marinković, Milana (58220269600)
    ;
    Grujičić, Danica (7004438060)
    ;
    Stanimirović, Aleksandar (57215793610)
    ;
    Šćepanović, Vuk (55375352900)
    ;
    Milićević, Mihailo (57219130278)
    ;
    Jovićević, Nikola (58220923400)
    ;
    Videnović, Goran (24462700800)
    ;
    Pavlović, Vedrana (57202093978)
    ;
    Bogunović Stojičić, Sanda (58617331700)
    ;
    Jovanović, Milan (57210477379)
    ;
    Jeremić, Jelena (15022530400)
    ;
    Jović, Marko (57190425324)
    ;
    Ilić, Rosanda (56688276500)
    ;
    Stojičić, Milan (24554259500)
    Background and Objectives: Before the introduction of griseofluvin, the use of X-ray radiation was the treatment of choice for tinea capitis. More than half a century later various types of tumors have been found to be associated with childhood irradiation due to tinea capitis, most commonly cancers of the head and neck, as well as brain tumors. The often unusually aggressive and recurrent nature of these tumors necessitates the need for repeated surgeries, while the atrophic skin with an impaired vascular supply due to radiation often poses an additional challenge for defect reconstruction. We present our experience in the surgical treatment of such patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. In this study, 37 patients treated for acquired defects of the scalp with a history of irradiation therapy due to tinea capitis in childhood were included in this study, 24 male and 13 female patients. The mean age at the first appointment was 60.6 ± 7.8, with the youngest included patient being 46 and the oldest being 75 years old. Patients’ characteristics, surgical treatment, and complications were analyzed and a reconstructive algorithm was developed. Results: Local flaps were used for reconstruction in 34 patients, direct sutures were used in 10 patients and 20 patients received split-thickness skin grafts for coverage of both primary and secondary defects for reconstruction of flap donor sites. One regional flap and one dermal substitute covered by an autologous skin graft were also used for reconstruction. Complications occurred in 43.2% of patients and were significantly associated with the presence of comorbidities (p = 0.001), aseptic bone necrosis (p = 0.001), as well as skin atrophy in frontal, occipital, and parietal region (p = 0.001, p = 0.042 and p = 0.001, respectively). A significant correlation between major complications and moderate skin atrophy was found only in the parietal region (p = 0.026). Conclusions: Unfortunately, many protocols developed for scalp reconstruction are not applicable in the setting of severe or diffuse scalp skin atrophy associated with high tumor recurrence rate and radiation-induced vascular impairment, such as in tinea capitis patients in Serbia. An algorithm has been developed based on the authors’ experience in managing these patients. © 2023 by the authors.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback