Browsing by Author "Stamenković, Jelena (54414801300)"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Coexisting Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma and Lissencephaly: Unique Case Report with Pathological Analysis and Its Clinical Significance(2025) ;Zakić, Hristina (59528037800) ;Kontić Vučinić, Olivera (16063770000) ;Stamenković, Jelena (54414801300) ;Jevtić, Jovan (57216432772) ;Perišić Mitrović, Milena (59526739200)Životić, Maja (56320853500)Background: Congenital mesoblastic nephroma represents 3–10% of all pediatric renal tumors. With the advancement of ultrasound diagnostics and magnetic resonance imaging, the diagnosis of this renal neoplasm is increasingly being established prenatally and at birth. It usually presents as a benign tumor, but it can severely affect pregnancy outcomes, contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Lissencephaly belongs to a rare category of neurodevelopmental disorders marked by the absence of a substantial reduction in the typical folds and grooves in the cerebral cortex. The prognosis for patients with lissencephaly is extremely poor, carrying with it a high mortality rate. Case Presentation: We present a case of congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN) diagnosed with polyhydramnios at 28 weeks of gestation, which led to preterm delivery at 29 weeks and a fatal outcome for the newborn. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of CMN along with fetal pachygyria/lissencephaly. The aim of this study is to point out the characteristics and unique correlation between CMN and lissencephaly, and to illustrate the histopathological features of CMN and lissencephaly through an educational example derived from our presented index case. To the best to our knowledge, the association of CMN with lissencephaly has not been described in the literature so far. Conclusions: Outlining the prenatal progression of CMN and the outcome of pregnancies involving fetal CMN and lissencephaly, this case underscores the importance of comprehensive ultrasound examinations, including central nervous system evaluation, to identify potential coexisting anomalies and refine prenatal diagnostic practices. © 2025 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Coexisting Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma and Lissencephaly: Unique Case Report with Pathological Analysis and Its Clinical Significance(2025) ;Zakić, Hristina (59528037800) ;Kontić Vučinić, Olivera (16063770000) ;Stamenković, Jelena (54414801300) ;Jevtić, Jovan (57216432772) ;Perišić Mitrović, Milena (59526739200)Životić, Maja (56320853500)Background: Congenital mesoblastic nephroma represents 3–10% of all pediatric renal tumors. With the advancement of ultrasound diagnostics and magnetic resonance imaging, the diagnosis of this renal neoplasm is increasingly being established prenatally and at birth. It usually presents as a benign tumor, but it can severely affect pregnancy outcomes, contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Lissencephaly belongs to a rare category of neurodevelopmental disorders marked by the absence of a substantial reduction in the typical folds and grooves in the cerebral cortex. The prognosis for patients with lissencephaly is extremely poor, carrying with it a high mortality rate. Case Presentation: We present a case of congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN) diagnosed with polyhydramnios at 28 weeks of gestation, which led to preterm delivery at 29 weeks and a fatal outcome for the newborn. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of CMN along with fetal pachygyria/lissencephaly. The aim of this study is to point out the characteristics and unique correlation between CMN and lissencephaly, and to illustrate the histopathological features of CMN and lissencephaly through an educational example derived from our presented index case. To the best to our knowledge, the association of CMN with lissencephaly has not been described in the literature so far. Conclusions: Outlining the prenatal progression of CMN and the outcome of pregnancies involving fetal CMN and lissencephaly, this case underscores the importance of comprehensive ultrasound examinations, including central nervous system evaluation, to identify potential coexisting anomalies and refine prenatal diagnostic practices. © 2025 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prenatally diagnosed fetal heart rhythm abnormalities-incidence, diagnosis and outcome(2022) ;Stamenković, Jelena (54414801300) ;Parezanović, Vojislav (14325763000) ;Kontić-Vučinić, Olivera (16063770000) ;Stefanović, Ivan (25628694100) ;Trkulja, Maja (57778848200) ;Jovanović, Ida (23989306000) ;Ljubić, Aleksandar (6701387628)Srbinović, Milena (57189330634)Backrounds: Fetal arrhythmias represent a significant cause of fetal morbidity and mortality and occur in approximately 1-3% of pregnancies. The unknown fetal arrhythmias are the cause of intrauterine fetal demise in as many as 3-10% of cases, as well as the cause of unexplained fetal hydrops or premature births. Methods: A fetal echocardiography test makes it possible to notice structural heart defects at very early stages of pregnancy. The ultrasound heart rate monitoring also involves the use of specific Doppler methods. Heart rhythm disorders may occur in the form of tachycardia (sinus tachycardia (ST), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and atrial flutter (AF)) or in the form of bradycardia (sinus bradycardia (SB), atrial bigeminy (AB) and complete AV block). The most frequently diagnosed fetal heart rhythm disorders are isolated extrasystoles with no clinical significance. Results: In this study, we have examined 7863 fetuses (182 were multiple gestations). Out of the total number of examined patients, 572 fetuses (7.23%) had pathological heart features, while 127 (1.61%) had some form of rhythm disorder. Conclusions: The ability to recognize the heart rhythm disorder and commence the treatment in a timely manner increases the treatment success rate. Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
