Browsing by Author "Shimon, Ilan (35571386800)"

Context. Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Methods. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had IGF-I 1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I 1.0× ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample GH 1.0 ng/mL. Results. The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I 1.0× ULN (odds ratio, 126.53; 95% CI, 13.73-999.99; P .0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (± SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04 ± 0.09× ULN vs 0.83 ± 0.1× ULN (P .0001); mean (± SE) change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score of −0.6 ± 1.5 vs 4.6 ± 1.6 (P = .02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) vs 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio, 16.61; 95% CI, 2.86-181.36; P = .0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs. Conclusion. Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Context. Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Methods. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had IGF-I 1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I 1.0× ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample GH 1.0 ng/mL. Results. The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I 1.0× ULN (odds ratio, 126.53; 95% CI, 13.73-999.99; P .0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (± SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04 ± 0.09× ULN vs 0.83 ± 0.1× ULN (P .0001); mean (± SE) change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score of −0.6 ± 1.5 vs 4.6 ± 1.6 (P = .02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) vs 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio, 16.61; 95% CI, 2.86-181.36; P = .0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs. Conclusion. Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Acromegaly is a rare condition typically caused by benign pituitary adenomas, resulting in excessive production of growth hormone. Clinical manifestations of acromegaly are diverse, varying from the overgrowth of body tissue to cardiovascular, metabolic, and osteoarticular disorders. Symptoms may emerge slowly, overlapping with other diseases and often involve many different healthcare specialists. In the last decade, efforts to provide an accurate and timely diagnosis of acromegaly have improved disease management and clinical experience. Despite this progress, marked differences in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of acromegaly exist from country-to-country. To address these inconsistencies in the region comprising Central and Eastern Europe, Israel, and Kazakhstan, a panel of acromegaly experts from 13 of these countries was convened. Acromegaly experts from each country provided available information on the approaches from their country, including regional treatment centers and multidisciplinary teams, treatment access, reimbursement and availability, and physician education, disease awareness, and patient advocacy. Across several areas of acromegaly management, divergent approaches were identified and discussed, including the provision of multidisciplinary care, approved and available treatments, and disease awareness programs. These were recognized as areas of potential improvement in the management of acromegaly, in addition to participation in national and regional acromegaly registries. Further experience exchange will facilitate the identification of specific strategies that can be adapted in each country, and widespread participation in acromegaly registries will enable their evaluation. It is anticipated that this approach will support the optimization of acromegaly patient care across this region. Copyright © 2022 Bolanowski, Adnan, Doknic, Guk, Hána, Ilovayskaya, Kastelan, Kocjan, Kužma, Nurbekova, Poiana, Szücs, Vandeva, Gomez, Paidac, Simoneau and Shimon.

Objectives: Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare disease characterised by abnormal body composition, reduced strength and exercise capacity and impaired psychological wellbeing. An advisory board of leading Central and Eastern European (CEE) endocrinologists was assembled to gain insights into the status of AGHD care in the CEE region. Topics of discussion included the position of adult hypopituitarism/AGHD in health system priorities, availability and affordability of treatments, awareness of AGHD, practice guidelines used in CEE countries and provisions for long-term care of patients. Design: Prior to the meeting, the advisors were asked to summarise, using an itemised survey questionnaire, the usual standards of care for patients with AGHD in their country. At the meeting, the panel of experts discussed the findings and thereby elucidated similarities and differences among CEE countries; these were compared with international guideline-recommended practices for AGHD. Results: All CEE countries involved reported having some type of infrastructure in place for care of patients with GHD transitioning from adolescence to adulthood. Most countries reported having at least one specialist centre for patients with AGHD. The main variations across the region included initial entry into healthcare systems, tests required to confirm AGHD diagnosis and medication reimbursement by health authorities. Most CEE countries relied on international society-led guidelines, while some countries have developed national guidelines. Conclusion: The CEE Adult Endocrinology Advisory Board meeting recognised considerable diversity in the care and patient pathways for AGHD across CEE countries. Additional work is needed to optimise care of patients with AGHD in the CEE region. © 2019 The Authors

Objectives: Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare disease characterised by abnormal body composition, reduced strength and exercise capacity and impaired psychological wellbeing. An advisory board of leading Central and Eastern European (CEE) endocrinologists was assembled to gain insights into the status of AGHD care in the CEE region. Topics of discussion included the position of adult hypopituitarism/AGHD in health system priorities, availability and affordability of treatments, awareness of AGHD, practice guidelines used in CEE countries and provisions for long-term care of patients. Design: Prior to the meeting, the advisors were asked to summarise, using an itemised survey questionnaire, the usual standards of care for patients with AGHD in their country. At the meeting, the panel of experts discussed the findings and thereby elucidated similarities and differences among CEE countries; these were compared with international guideline-recommended practices for AGHD. Results: All CEE countries involved reported having some type of infrastructure in place for care of patients with GHD transitioning from adolescence to adulthood. Most countries reported having at least one specialist centre for patients with AGHD. The main variations across the region included initial entry into healthcare systems, tests required to confirm AGHD diagnosis and medication reimbursement by health authorities. Most CEE countries relied on international society-led guidelines, while some countries have developed national guidelines. Conclusion: The CEE Adult Endocrinology Advisory Board meeting recognised considerable diversity in the care and patient pathways for AGHD across CEE countries. Additional work is needed to optimise care of patients with AGHD in the CEE region. © 2019 The Authors

Objectives: Prolactin (PRL)-secreting macroadenomas usually measure between 10 and 40 mm. Giant (adenoma size ≥40 mm) PRL-tumors are not common, and larger prolactinomas (maximal diameter ≥60 mm) are rare, and their management outcomes have not been well characterized. Methods: We have identified 18 subjects (16 men, 2 females) with giant PRL-adenomas (size ≥60 mm; PRL > 1000 ng/ml) and summarized their characteristics and response to treatment. Results: Mean age was 36.3 ± 13.5 years (range 12–59 years). Mean adenoma size was 71.8 ± 10.2 mm (60–92 mm). Complaints at presentation included headaches in 11 patients, visual deterioration in 9, sexual dysfunction in 9 males, and behavioral changes in two. Fourteen (78 %) had visual field defects. Mean PRL at presentation was 28,465 ng/ml (range 1300–270,000). All patients were treated with cabergoline (3.9 ± 2.0 mg/week), except for one who received bromocriptine. Treatment achieved PRL normalization in 11/18 patients within a median interval of 20 months. Visual improvement occurred in 12/14 patients with pre-treatment visual abnormalities. Nine patients underwent surgery (transsphenoidal, 7; transcranial, 2). None of the seven patients with elevated PRL before surgery achieved remission post-operatively. After a follow-up of 7.8 ± 5.1 years, 15/18 patients had significant adenoma shrinkage. Eleven patients are normoprolactinemic, 3 are partially controlled (PRL < 3 × ULN), and 4 remain with significantly elevated PRL. Most patients reported disappearance or improvement of their complaints. Conclusions: These enormous PRL-adenomas are invasive but respond fairly well to medical treatment. Long-term therapy with high dose cabergoline together with a pituitary surgery in some patients was the key for their successful management, achieving biochemical and clinical remission in most patients. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Objectives: Prolactin (PRL)-secreting macroadenomas usually measure between 10 and 40 mm. Giant (adenoma size ≥40 mm) PRL-tumors are not common, and larger prolactinomas (maximal diameter ≥60 mm) are rare, and their management outcomes have not been well characterized. Methods: We have identified 18 subjects (16 men, 2 females) with giant PRL-adenomas (size ≥60 mm; PRL > 1000 ng/ml) and summarized their characteristics and response to treatment. Results: Mean age was 36.3 ± 13.5 years (range 12–59 years). Mean adenoma size was 71.8 ± 10.2 mm (60–92 mm). Complaints at presentation included headaches in 11 patients, visual deterioration in 9, sexual dysfunction in 9 males, and behavioral changes in two. Fourteen (78 %) had visual field defects. Mean PRL at presentation was 28,465 ng/ml (range 1300–270,000). All patients were treated with cabergoline (3.9 ± 2.0 mg/week), except for one who received bromocriptine. Treatment achieved PRL normalization in 11/18 patients within a median interval of 20 months. Visual improvement occurred in 12/14 patients with pre-treatment visual abnormalities. Nine patients underwent surgery (transsphenoidal, 7; transcranial, 2). None of the seven patients with elevated PRL before surgery achieved remission post-operatively. After a follow-up of 7.8 ± 5.1 years, 15/18 patients had significant adenoma shrinkage. Eleven patients are normoprolactinemic, 3 are partially controlled (PRL < 3 × ULN), and 4 remain with significantly elevated PRL. Most patients reported disappearance or improvement of their complaints. Conclusions: These enormous PRL-adenomas are invasive but respond fairly well to medical treatment. Long-term therapy with high dose cabergoline together with a pituitary surgery in some patients was the key for their successful management, achieving biochemical and clinical remission in most patients. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.