Browsing by Author "Samardžić, Natalija (56033770200)"

Background/Aim. Peripheral nervous system affection in people with lung cancer is commonly associated with paraneoplastic neuropathy. However, clinical studies evaluating the frequency, clinical, and electrophysiological characteristics of peripheral neuropathies which are not related to onconeuronal antibodies, in this, on average, older population of patients, are very rare. The aim of this study was to define the frequency, as well as clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of idiopathic neuropathies in patients suffering from lung cancer in early stages of the diseases. Methods. Clinical and electrophysiological data of 105 elderly subjects (age 63.4 ± 7.8 years) suffering from lung carcinoma who underwent extensive neurological and electrophysiological evaluation (nerve conduction studies) between 2013–2018 were estimated. Exclusion criteria were “classical” paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with onconeuronal antibodies present, as well as patients with typical known causes of peripheral neuropathy (e.g. diabetes, alcoholism, chronic renal insufficiency, vitamin deficiencies, etc.). Results. There were 19.1% patients with clinically manifest neuropathies, with additional 37.1% patients with only electrophysiological abnormalities. The most frequent pathophysiological pattern was axonal pathology (71.2%) with predominantly distal and symmetrical distribution (86.4%). Conclusion. Patients with lung cancer in the early stages of the disease show a high incidence of clinically minor damage of the nerves, according to the pattern of chronic sensomotor distal neuropathy, with predominance of axonal damage. These findings underline the importance of a detailed clinical and electrophysiological evaluation in this category of patients who are without the typical etiological factors for peripheral neuropathies since, during cancer therapy, patients undergo a series of treatments with additional risk for the development/aggravation of neuropathy. © 2020 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

Background/Aim. Thymoma is the most common mediastinal tumor. The treatment procedures are based on the results from the research of retrospective studies because they are not frequent tumors. The aim of this work was to define common clinical features, therapeutic aspects, survival and recurrence free survival. Methods. This study was performed in the Clinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade from January 1993 to December 2013. We analyzed 62 patients with histopathologically proven thymoma. The results were obtaind from medical history, physical exam, chest X-ray and/or computed tomography and operational findings or diagnostic procedure reports. Thymomas were clasiffied according to the World Health Organization classifying system, based on histopathological findings, and staged according to the Masaoka-Koga staging system. Results. There were more female (54.8%) patients. Patients were mostly in the seventh decade of life. One third (29%) of the patients were asymptomatic. Cough was the dominant symptom. Myasthenia gravis was the most common paraneoplastic syndrome (12.9%). Solitary tumor was the most common in our patients (61.3%), as well as the tumors larger than 5 cm (52.5%), and noninvasive thymomas (52.5%). The majority of patients (40%) were in the stage I of the disease. The operative approach was conducted in most of the patients (88.7%). A statistically significant difference in survival was in women, patients with solitary tumor, non-invasive thymomas, patients in the stage I of the disease, and those who were operated. The dimension of the tumor mass approached the conventional level of significance. Conclusion. In patients with thymomas, statistically significant survival rate predictors are gender, presence of solitary tumor mass, tumor invasiveness, clinical stage and surgical treatment of the disease. © 2020 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

Background and objectives: The objective of this research was to analyze the correlation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1), and Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) with the response to first-line chemotherapy in a cohort of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, and to determine their potential as predictive serum biomarkers. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 SCLC patients were included. Blood samples were taken to determine CRP, sPD-L1, and SLFN11 levels. The first sampling was performed before the start of chemotherapy, the second after two cycles, and the third after four cycles of chemotherapy. Results: The patients who died earlier during the study had NLR and SLFN11 concentrations significantly higher compared to the survivor group. In the group of survivors, after two cycles of chemotherapy, the NLR ratio decreased significantly (p < 0.01), but after four cycles, the NLR ratio increased (p < 0.05). Their serum SLFN11 concentration increased significantly (p < 0.001) after two cycles of chemotherapy, but after four cycles, the level of SLFN11 fell significantly (p < 0.01). CRP, NLR, and SLFN11 were significant predictors of patient survival according to Kaplan–Meier analysis. The combination of inflammatory parameters and SLFN11 with a cutoff value above the 75th percentile of the predicted probability was associated with significantly lower overall survival in SCLC patients (average survival of 3.6 months vs. 4.8 months). Conclusion: The combination of inflammatory markers and the levels of two specific proteins (sPD-L1, SLFN11) could potentially serve as a non-invasive biomarker for predicting responses to DNA-damaging therapeutic agents in SCLC. © 2024 by the authors.

Background and objectives: The objective of this research was to analyze the correlation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1), and Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) with the response to first-line chemotherapy in a cohort of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, and to determine their potential as predictive serum biomarkers. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 SCLC patients were included. Blood samples were taken to determine CRP, sPD-L1, and SLFN11 levels. The first sampling was performed before the start of chemotherapy, the second after two cycles, and the third after four cycles of chemotherapy. Results: The patients who died earlier during the study had NLR and SLFN11 concentrations significantly higher compared to the survivor group. In the group of survivors, after two cycles of chemotherapy, the NLR ratio decreased significantly (p < 0.01), but after four cycles, the NLR ratio increased (p < 0.05). Their serum SLFN11 concentration increased significantly (p < 0.001) after two cycles of chemotherapy, but after four cycles, the level of SLFN11 fell significantly (p < 0.01). CRP, NLR, and SLFN11 were significant predictors of patient survival according to Kaplan–Meier analysis. The combination of inflammatory parameters and SLFN11 with a cutoff value above the 75th percentile of the predicted probability was associated with significantly lower overall survival in SCLC patients (average survival of 3.6 months vs. 4.8 months). Conclusion: The combination of inflammatory markers and the levels of two specific proteins (sPD-L1, SLFN11) could potentially serve as a non-invasive biomarker for predicting responses to DNA-damaging therapeutic agents in SCLC. © 2024 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. © 2024 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. © 2024 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: Patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous group of patients. In the past, the standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer was concurrent or sequential radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But the progression-free survival was 8 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was less than 20%. After the results of the PACIFIC study, the standard of care for this group of patients is chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab as consolidation therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Methods: We included 24 patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who did not progress after sequential chemoradiotherapy and who received durvalumab consolidation. Results: Median progression-free survival was 16 months, 95% CI (0.5–31.5), and median overall survival was 20 months, 95% CI (13.4–26.6 months). The twelve-month progression-free survival and overall survival rate were 55.1% and 68%, respectively, and the 18-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.1% and 56.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Durvalumab introduced a new era in the treatment of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with a significantly prolonged 5-year overall survival rate. Our study is one of the few that investigated the efficacy of durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Our results showed that durvalumab is effective in patients who were treated with sequential CRT. However, the time between radiotherapy termination and the start of durvalumab should be shorter. © 2025 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: Patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous group of patients. In the past, the standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer was concurrent or sequential radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But the progression-free survival was 8 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was less than 20%. After the results of the PACIFIC study, the standard of care for this group of patients is chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab as consolidation therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Methods: We included 24 patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who did not progress after sequential chemoradiotherapy and who received durvalumab consolidation. Results: Median progression-free survival was 16 months, 95% CI (0.5–31.5), and median overall survival was 20 months, 95% CI (13.4–26.6 months). The twelve-month progression-free survival and overall survival rate were 55.1% and 68%, respectively, and the 18-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.1% and 56.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Durvalumab introduced a new era in the treatment of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with a significantly prolonged 5-year overall survival rate. Our study is one of the few that investigated the efficacy of durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Our results showed that durvalumab is effective in patients who were treated with sequential CRT. However, the time between radiotherapy termination and the start of durvalumab should be shorter. © 2025 by the authors.

Lung cancer represents the most common cause of cancer related death. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liver metastases (LM) have worse prognosis with an overall survival (OS) of three to six months. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes in patients with EGFR mutated (EGFRmut) lung adenocarcinoma as well as the presence of LM. (A total of 105 patients were included in the analysis). They were divided into two groups based on the presence of LM. OS was 13 months for the whole group and also 13 months for patients with and without LM. The 9-year survival rate for patients with and without LM was 12.5% and 3.4%, respectively. Further, the 9-year survival rate for the whole group of patients was 4.8%. There are few data about survival rates beyond 5 years for patients with locally advanced and metastatic EGFRmut NSCLC, mainly because patients with lung cancer rarely live for such a long time. Regarding patients with liver metastases, the results of our study showed similar outcomes compared to patients without LM. As these patients represent a significant number of patients, we need a wider range of therapeutic options. It might be that combination therapies represent a better therapeutic option. © 2024 by the authors.

Lung cancer represents the most common cause of cancer related death. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liver metastases (LM) have worse prognosis with an overall survival (OS) of three to six months. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes in patients with EGFR mutated (EGFRmut) lung adenocarcinoma as well as the presence of LM. (A total of 105 patients were included in the analysis). They were divided into two groups based on the presence of LM. OS was 13 months for the whole group and also 13 months for patients with and without LM. The 9-year survival rate for patients with and without LM was 12.5% and 3.4%, respectively. Further, the 9-year survival rate for the whole group of patients was 4.8%. There are few data about survival rates beyond 5 years for patients with locally advanced and metastatic EGFRmut NSCLC, mainly because patients with lung cancer rarely live for such a long time. Regarding patients with liver metastases, the results of our study showed similar outcomes compared to patients without LM. As these patients represent a significant number of patients, we need a wider range of therapeutic options. It might be that combination therapies represent a better therapeutic option. © 2024 by the authors.

Before the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of up to 10%. After the positive results of KEYNOTE-024, pembrolizumab was approved in a first-line setting for patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. A small number of patients had a durable response to immunotherapy, and so far it has not been discovered who will benefit. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in a real-world setting. We enrolled 35 patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC who had PD-L1 ≥ 50%. Progression-free survival was 9 months, 95% CI (2.6–15.4). Overall survival was 14 months, 95% CI (0–28.5). Five-year OS rate for the whole group of patients was 20%, and the six-year OS rate was 17.2%. Immunotherapy was a revolution in the treatment of NSCLC. We still do not know which patients will benefit from immunotherapy, but patients who do respond may experience long-term outcomes. © 2025 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored the association between irAEs and the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved 105 advanced NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy after progressing on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy from a single academic institution in Serbia. Data were obtained from a hospital lung cancer registry. Among the participants, 63.8% were male, with the majority being current (53.3%) or former smokers (37.1%). About half had a good performance status (ECOG PS 0–1) at the start of atezolizumab treatment. irAEs occurred in 23 patients (21.9%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs (13.03 months) compared to those without (3.4 months) (HR 0.365 [95% CI, 0.195–0.681], p = 0.002). irAEs and ECOG PS 0–1 were predictors of longer mPFS, with irAEs being more common in patients with good performance status (p = 0.01). irAEs were linked to improved mPFS in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab after multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. © 2024 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored the association between irAEs and the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved 105 advanced NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy after progressing on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy from a single academic institution in Serbia. Data were obtained from a hospital lung cancer registry. Among the participants, 63.8% were male, with the majority being current (53.3%) or former smokers (37.1%). About half had a good performance status (ECOG PS 0–1) at the start of atezolizumab treatment. irAEs occurred in 23 patients (21.9%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs (13.03 months) compared to those without (3.4 months) (HR 0.365 [95% CI, 0.195–0.681], p = 0.002). irAEs and ECOG PS 0–1 were predictors of longer mPFS, with irAEs being more common in patients with good performance status (p = 0.01). irAEs were linked to improved mPFS in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab after multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. © 2024 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: A significant breakthrough in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has occurred with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. However, not all patients treated with these therapies would respond to treatment, and patients who respond to treatment would acquire resistance at some time point. This is why we need new biomarkers that can predict response to therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether soluble programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) could be a predictive biomarker in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Blood samples from 35 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRmut) adenocarcinoma who achieved disease control with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy were collected for sPD-L1 analysis. We analyzed sPD-L1 concentrations in 30 healthy middle-aged subjects, as a control population, to determine the reference range. Adenocarcinoma patients were divided into two groups, i.e., a group with low sPD-L1 (≤182.5 ng/L) and a group with high sPD-L1 (>182.5 ng/L). Results: We found that progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months, 95% CI (11.1–24.9), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 25 months, 95% CI (8.3–41.7), for patients with high sPD-L1. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the groups (p = 0.100). Overall survival (OS) was 34.4 months, 95% CI (26.6–42.2), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 84.1 months, 95% CI (50.6–117.6), for patients with high sPD-L1; there was also no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Conclusion: In our study, we found that patients with high sPD-L1 had numerically better PFS and OS, but this has no statistical significance. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the role of sPD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in patients with EGFRmut NSCLC. © 2025 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: A significant breakthrough in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has occurred with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. However, not all patients treated with these therapies would respond to treatment, and patients who respond to treatment would acquire resistance at some time point. This is why we need new biomarkers that can predict response to therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether soluble programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) could be a predictive biomarker in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Blood samples from 35 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRmut) adenocarcinoma who achieved disease control with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy were collected for sPD-L1 analysis. We analyzed sPD-L1 concentrations in 30 healthy middle-aged subjects, as a control population, to determine the reference range. Adenocarcinoma patients were divided into two groups, i.e., a group with low sPD-L1 (≤182.5 ng/L) and a group with high sPD-L1 (>182.5 ng/L). Results: We found that progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months, 95% CI (11.1–24.9), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 25 months, 95% CI (8.3–41.7), for patients with high sPD-L1. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the groups (p = 0.100). Overall survival (OS) was 34.4 months, 95% CI (26.6–42.2), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 84.1 months, 95% CI (50.6–117.6), for patients with high sPD-L1; there was also no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Conclusion: In our study, we found that patients with high sPD-L1 had numerically better PFS and OS, but this has no statistical significance. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the role of sPD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in patients with EGFRmut NSCLC. © 2025 by the authors.

Lung cancer represents the most common cause of cancer-related death. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liver metastases have worse prognosis, with an overall survival (OS) from three to six months. The majority of them have a poor response to chemotherapy, and the data are controversial regarding the response to immunotherapy. This could be because the liver is considered to be an immune-tolerant organ, which is characterized by T-cell anergy and immunosuppressive signals. This review evaluates current treatment options for patients with NSCLC and liver metastases. Combination therapies might be a better treatment option for this subgroup of patients. The addition of radiotherapy to immunotherapy could also be an option in selected patients. The resection of single liver metastasis should also be considered. © 2024 by the authors.

Lung cancer represents the most common cause of cancer-related death. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liver metastases have worse prognosis, with an overall survival (OS) from three to six months. The majority of them have a poor response to chemotherapy, and the data are controversial regarding the response to immunotherapy. This could be because the liver is considered to be an immune-tolerant organ, which is characterized by T-cell anergy and immunosuppressive signals. This review evaluates current treatment options for patients with NSCLC and liver metastases. Combination therapies might be a better treatment option for this subgroup of patients. The addition of radiotherapy to immunotherapy could also be an option in selected patients. The resection of single liver metastasis should also be considered. © 2024 by the authors.