Browsing by Author "Rasulic, Iva (57201359522)"

Background: It has not been clarified yet if persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at increased risk to develop glucose metabolism dysregulation. The aims of the present study were to evaluate glucose metabolism characteristics in persons with MS and to compare it to the healthy individuals; to examine the association of glucose metabolism with the level of disability and its progression. Methods: The study enrolled 78 patients with MS and 26, comparable for age, gender and body mass index (BMI), healthy controls (HC). Disability and its progression were evaluated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, progression index (PI) and multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS). All participants performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin and lipid parameters were analyzed. Results: Fasting glucose concentrations (5.3±0.7 in MS patients vs. 4.5±0.9 mmol/L in HC, p=0.001) and 2 hour post-load glucose concentrations were statistically significantly higher in MS patients compared with controls. Glucose levels at all different time points during OGTT, baseline insulin, Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol and LDL were statistically significantly (p<0.05) associated with MS, in univariable logistic regression analysis. Glucose level at 120’ was independently associated with MS (OR=3.937, 95% CI 1.178-13.159, p=0.026), in the multivariable model. The prevalence of IR was 64.1% in the MS group compared to 30.8% in the control group (p=0.008), based on HOMA-IR. EDSS and Multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS) were associated with glucose levels at different time points (p<0.05). According to the ROC analysis, best cut-off value for HOMA-IR is 2.3, providing both sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% in discriminating persons with MS and HC. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the presence of higher prevalence of IR in MS patients compared to healthy individuals, and strong association between impaired glucose metabolism and disability. Finally, it has to be emphasized that further studies are warranted to confirm our findings implicating that MS patients have significantly higher risk of impaired glucose metabolism, which could suggest the potential importance of the performance of OGTT in patients with this disorder. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Background: It has not been clarified yet if persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at increased risk to develop glucose metabolism dysregulation. The aims of the present study were to evaluate glucose metabolism characteristics in persons with MS and to compare it to the healthy individuals; to examine the association of glucose metabolism with the level of disability and its progression. Methods: The study enrolled 78 patients with MS and 26, comparable for age, gender and body mass index (BMI), healthy controls (HC). Disability and its progression were evaluated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, progression index (PI) and multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS). All participants performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin and lipid parameters were analyzed. Results: Fasting glucose concentrations (5.3±0.7 in MS patients vs. 4.5±0.9 mmol/L in HC, p=0.001) and 2 hour post-load glucose concentrations were statistically significantly higher in MS patients compared with controls. Glucose levels at all different time points during OGTT, baseline insulin, Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol and LDL were statistically significantly (p<0.05) associated with MS, in univariable logistic regression analysis. Glucose level at 120’ was independently associated with MS (OR=3.937, 95% CI 1.178-13.159, p=0.026), in the multivariable model. The prevalence of IR was 64.1% in the MS group compared to 30.8% in the control group (p=0.008), based on HOMA-IR. EDSS and Multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS) were associated with glucose levels at different time points (p<0.05). According to the ROC analysis, best cut-off value for HOMA-IR is 2.3, providing both sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% in discriminating persons with MS and HC. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the presence of higher prevalence of IR in MS patients compared to healthy individuals, and strong association between impaired glucose metabolism and disability. Finally, it has to be emphasized that further studies are warranted to confirm our findings implicating that MS patients have significantly higher risk of impaired glucose metabolism, which could suggest the potential importance of the performance of OGTT in patients with this disorder. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Background and aims: Management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) may vary across different settings due to factors related to population characteristics, practice, resources and/or policies. We conducted a survey among the worldwide network of EAS FHSC Lead Investigators to provide an overview of FH status in different countries. Methods: Lead Investigators from countries formally involved in the EAS FHSC by mid-May 2018 were invited to provide a brief report on FH status in their countries, including available information, programmes, initiatives, and management. Results: 63 countries provided reports. Data on FH prevalence are lacking in most countries. Where available, data tend to align with recent estimates, suggesting a higher frequency than that traditionally considered. Low rates of FH detection are reported across all regions. National registries and education programmes to improve FH awareness/knowledge are a recognised priority, but funding is often lacking. In most countries, diagnosis primarily relies on the Dutch Lipid Clinics Network criteria. Although available in many countries, genetic testing is not widely implemented (frequent cost issues). There are only a few national official government programmes for FH. Under-treatment is an issue. FH therapy is not universally reimbursed. PCSK9-inhibitors are available in ∼2/3 countries. Lipoprotein-apheresis is offered in ∼60% countries, although access is limited. Conclusions: FH is a recognised public health concern. Management varies widely across countries, with overall suboptimal identification and under-treatment. Efforts and initiatives to improve FH knowledge and management are underway, including development of national registries, but support, particularly from health authorities, and better funding are greatly needed. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.