Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Rakocevic, Ivana (57199519440)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Does Atrial Fibrillation at Diagnosis Change Prognosis in Patients with Aortic Stenosis?
    (2024)
    Petrovic, Olga (33467955000)
    ;
    Vidanovic, Stasa (59217946400)
    ;
    Jovanovic, Ivana (57223117334)
    ;
    Paunovic, Ivana (57197090935)
    ;
    Rakocevic, Ivana (57199519440)
    ;
    Milasinovic, Dejan (24823024500)
    ;
    Tesic, Milorad (36197477200)
    ;
    Boskovic, Nikola (6508290354)
    ;
    Dukic, Djordje (57919369500)
    ;
    Ostojic, Marina (56810816200)
    ;
    Vratonjic, Jelena (57216883910)
    ;
    Mladenovic, Aleksandra (59196797900)
    ;
    Trifunovic-Zamaklar, Danijela (9241771000)
    Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, frequently associated with AS. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of AF on mortality in patients with moderate and severe AS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1070 consecutive moderate and severe AS patients (57% were male, age was 69 ± 10, severe AS 22.5%), who underwent transthoracic echocardiography from March 2018 to November 2021. AS severity was defined by specific threshold values with severe AS being defined by a peak velocity > 4 m/s, an MPG > 40 mmHg, and an AVA < 1 cm2 and moderated by a peak velocity of 3–4 m/s, an MPG 20–40 mmHg and an AVA 1–1.5 cm. Patients with AF were defined as those having a history of AF when AS was found on the index echocardiography. The follow-up assessment in December 2023 ascertained vital status and data on aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results: 790 (73.8%) patients were with sinus rhythm (SR) and 280 (26.2%) patients with AF. Mortality was higher in patients with AF than in those with SR (46% vs. 36.2% HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.121–1.809, p = 0.004). After adjusting for clinical confounders, mortality risk in AF relative to SR remained significant (HR 1.284, 95% CI 1.03–1.643, p = 0.047). Patients with AF demonstrated high mortality risk in the moderate aortic stenosis stratum (HR 1.376, 95% CI 1.059–1.788, p = 0.017), with even greater risk in the severe AS stratum (HR 1.644, 95% CI 1.038–2.603, p = 0.034) with significant interaction (p = 0.007). In patients with AF AVR demonstrated a protective effect on survival (HR 0.365, 95% CI 0.202–0.627, p < 0.001), but to a lesser degree than in patients with sinus rhythm (HR 0.376, 95% CI 0.250–0.561, p < 0.001) without significant interaction (p = 0.278). In patients with AF mortality risk was high in the conservative treatment stratum (HR 1.361, 95% CI 1.066–1.739, p = 0.014), in the AVR stratum mortality risk was higher but did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.823, 95% CI 0.973–3.414, p = 0.061). However, when corrected for echocardiographic variables strongly correlated with AF, AF was no longer independently associated with all-cause mortality. (HR 0.97 95% CI 0.709–1.323, p = 0.84). Conclusions: Patients with moderate and severe AS and AF have worse prognosis than patients with SR which can be explained by cardiac damage. AVR improves survival in patients with AF and with SR. © 2024 by the authors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Redesigning diabetes care delivery in Serbia, using JA CHRODIS Recommendations and criteria
    (2021)
    Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500)
    ;
    Gajovic, Jelena Stanarcic (56089716900)
    ;
    Stoiljkovic, Milica (57215024953)
    ;
    Rakocevic, Ivana (57199519440)
    ;
    Jotic, Aleksandra (13702545200)
    ;
    Maggini, Marina (7004694208)
    ;
    Zaletel, Jelka (6506217014)
    ;
    Lalic, Katarina (13702563300)
    ;
    Milicic, Tanja (24073432600)
    ;
    Lukic, Ljiljana (24073403700)
    ;
    Macesic, Marija (26967836100)
    ;
    Bjegovic-Mikanovic, Vesna (6602428758)
    Introduction. Managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) requires redesigning health care delivery to achieve better coordination of services at all levels of health care. The aim of this study was improving prevention and strengthening high quality of care for NCDs by using type 2 diabetes as a model disease. Methods. The mix method approach served to analyse the impact of the intervention processes. Source of information were routine health statistics, interviews and observation. Key Performance Indicators in defined Improvement Areas assisted in the quality of diabetes care assessment. Results and discussion. During the study the National Diabetes Centre (NDC) was established. The NDC experts organized numerous educational events, 316 physicians and nurses have participated. New electronic data base was implemented in 20 pilot Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs) with 38,833 electronic diabetes records. Conclusions. The intervention led to establishment of the NDC, strengthening competences of health care professionals and to the renewal of the Diabetes Care Units in PHCCs included in the study. © 2021 Istituto Superiore di Sanita. All rights reserved.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback