Browsing by Author "Rajkovic, Stanislav (56711148400)"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
 - Sort Options
 
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Segmental tibial fractures treated with Ilizarov circular fixator(2021) ;Tomic, Slavko (7103046299) ;Slavkovic, Nemanja (16550887400) ;Tulic, Goran (23036995600) ;Baljozovic, Andreja (57210982643) ;Jovanovic, Želimir (56697982400) ;Mirkovic, Milan (57190251388) ;Rajkovic, Stanislav (56711148400) ;Bogosavljevic, Nikola (57211279852) ;Šaponjski, Dušan (57193090494) ;Mihajlovic, Sladjana (57191859364)Jeremic, Danilo (57210977460)Background/Aim. Segmental fractures represent com-plex tibial injuries, featuring a unique fracture type that is most commonly caused by high-energy trauma. These fractures are considered to be a treatment challenge for or-thopaedic surgeons due to their sporadic presentation, wide zone of soft tissue injury, and increased rate of com-plications. They are characterized by a highly unstable in-termediary segment and a high rate of open fractures. The method of Ilizarov with its characteristics could offer many advantages over the existing operative techniques. This method, using a percutaneous approach, minimizes the intraoperative trauma and avoids the additional com-promising of the biological environment at the fracture site. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the Ilizarov fixator in the treatment of segmental tibial fractures. Methods. We analyzed 30 patients treated with the Ilizarov fixator between 2012 and 2017. The average age of patients was 36 years (from 24 to 65). The most common mechanism of injury was a road traffic accident. Open fractures were noted in 22 cases. All fractures were reduced using indirect percutaneous techniques with a great focus on achieving the correct length, rotation, and axial alignment of fragments. All patients were advised to bear weight as tolerated from the second postoperative day. Bone healing and functional results were evaluated according to the criteria established by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov. Re-sults. Bone healing was achieved in all patients. The aver-age time to union was 25 weeks (19 to 36 weeks). Bone results were excellent in 23 patients, good in five, and fair in two patients. Functional results were excellent in 22 cases, good in 5, and fair in three cases. Eight patients had minor pin-tract infections, successfully treated with oral antibiotics. Patients were without any major complica-tions. Conclusion. The Ilizarov method is a safe and effi-cient treatment modality for segmental tibial fractures. © 2021 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures(2023) ;Jeremić, Danilo (57210977460) ;Rajovic, Nina (57218484684) ;Gluscevic, Boris (6506291701) ;Krivokapic, Branislav (55750765600) ;Rajkovic, Stanislav (56711148400) ;Bogosavljevic, Nikola (57211279852) ;Davidovic, Kristina (55589463300)Tomic, Slavko (7103046299)Background: The purpose of this study was to collect all available randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the treatment of open tibial fractures with an external fixator (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. Material and methods: The systematic review was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Review). An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed until 1 March 2023 to identify RCTs which compared either IMN or EF to fix the open tibial fracture. Outcome measures were: postoperative superficial and deep infection, time to union, delayed union, malunion, nonunion and hardware failure. In addition, pain and health-related quality of life were evaluated after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Sixteen publications comprising 1011 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that the IMN technique had a lower postoperative superficial infection and malunion rate (RR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.56–4.95 and RR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.12–3.44, respectively), but higher hardware failure occurrence in contrast to EF (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.13–0.69). No significant differences were found in the union time, delayed union or nonunion rate, and postoperative deep infection rate between the treatments. Lower levels of pain were found in the EF group (RR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02–0.17, p < 0.001). A difference in quality of life favoring IMN after 3 months was found (RR = −0.04, 95%CI = −0.05–0.03, p < 0.001), however, no statistical difference was found after 12 months (RR = 0.03, 95%CI = −0.05–0.11, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Meta-analysis presented reduced incidence rates of superficial infection, malunion, and health-related quality of life 3 months after treatment in IMN. However, EF led to a significant reduction in pain and incidence rate of hardware failure. Postoperative deep infection, delayed union, nonunion and health-related quality of life 12 months following therapy were similar between groups. More high-quality RCTs should be conducted to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. © 2023 by the authors. 
