Browsing by Author "Radovic, Ivana (58359642200)"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Acquired von Willebrand syndrome and post-operative drainage: a comparison of patients with aortic stenosis versus coronary artery disease(2024) ;Djordjevic, Aleksandar (57220877412) ;Jovicic, Vladimir (55354036700) ;Lazovic, Dejan (57516854300) ;Terzic, Dusko (57195538891) ;Gacic, Jasna (26023073400) ;Petrovic, Masa (57219857642) ;Matejic, Aleksandar (58701316100) ;Salovic, Bojana (58700977400) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Jesic-Petrovic, Tanja (58700977300) ;Ristic, Arsen (7003835406)Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)Objective: Degenerative aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease are considered to be the most prevalent cardiovascular diseases in industrialized countries. This study aims to determine the change over time in von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor activity, and factor VIII and where there is a correlation with total post-operative drainage. Methods: The single-center retrospective study included 203 consecutive patients (64.5% male), undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery between March 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 at the University Clinical Center of Serbia in the Clinic for Cardiac Surgery in Belgrade, Serbia. All patients 18 years or older who presented with isolated, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis were included. The control group consisted of patients who presented with only coronary artery disease. Results: Between patients with only coronary artery disease and patients with coronary artery diseases and aortic stenosis, there was a statistically significant difference between pre-op and 1-month post-op fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor antigen, and von Willebrand factor (p < 0.001), post-op drainage, with overall lower drainage in coronary artery disease patients, and consistent increase in von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor activity, and Factor VIII post-operatively in patients with coronary artery diseases and aortic stenosis. Conclusion: This study has shown that there is a correlation between von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor activity and total drainage to the level of statistical significance in aortic stenosis patients and in the overall study population. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2024. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Economic Justification Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement(2023) ;Jovanovic, Marko (57219451923) ;Zivkovic, Igor (57192104502) ;Jovanovic, Milos (59581740900) ;Bilbija, Ilija (57113576000) ;Petrovic, Masa (57219857642) ;Markovic, Jovan (57803622300) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Dimitrijevic, Ana (57221766955)Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)There is no definitive consensus about the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) (MI-AVR) compared to conventional AVR (C-AVR). The aim of this study was to compare the rate of postoperative complications and total hospital costs of MI-AVR versus C-AVR overall and by the type of aortic prosthesis (biological or mechanical). Our single-center retrospective study included 324 patients over 18 years old who underwent elective isolated primary AVR with standard stented AV prosthesis at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Dedinje” between January 2019 and December 2019. Reintervention, emergencies, combined surgical interventions, and patients with sutureless valves were excluded. In both MI-AVR and C-AVR, mechanical valve implantation contributed to overall reduction of hospital costs with equal efficacy. The cost-effectiveness ratio indicated that C-AVR is cheaper and yielded a better clinical outcome with mechanical valve implantation (67.17 vs. 69.5). In biological valve implantation, MI-AVR was superior. MI-AVR patients had statistically significantly higher LVEF and a lower Euro SCORE than C-AVR patients (Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively). There is a slight advantage to MI-AVR vs. C-AVR, since it costs EUR 9.44 more to address complications that may arise. Complications (mortality, early reoperation, cerebrovascular insult, pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation, AV block, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, wound infection) were less frequent in the MI-AVR, making MI-AVR more economically justified than C-AVR (18% vs. 22.1%). © 2023 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Economic Justification Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement(2023) ;Jovanovic, Marko (57219451923) ;Zivkovic, Igor (57192104502) ;Jovanovic, Milos (59581740900) ;Bilbija, Ilija (57113576000) ;Petrovic, Masa (57219857642) ;Markovic, Jovan (57803622300) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Dimitrijevic, Ana (57221766955)Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)There is no definitive consensus about the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) (MI-AVR) compared to conventional AVR (C-AVR). The aim of this study was to compare the rate of postoperative complications and total hospital costs of MI-AVR versus C-AVR overall and by the type of aortic prosthesis (biological or mechanical). Our single-center retrospective study included 324 patients over 18 years old who underwent elective isolated primary AVR with standard stented AV prosthesis at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Dedinje” between January 2019 and December 2019. Reintervention, emergencies, combined surgical interventions, and patients with sutureless valves were excluded. In both MI-AVR and C-AVR, mechanical valve implantation contributed to overall reduction of hospital costs with equal efficacy. The cost-effectiveness ratio indicated that C-AVR is cheaper and yielded a better clinical outcome with mechanical valve implantation (67.17 vs. 69.5). In biological valve implantation, MI-AVR was superior. MI-AVR patients had statistically significantly higher LVEF and a lower Euro SCORE than C-AVR patients (Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively). There is a slight advantage to MI-AVR vs. C-AVR, since it costs EUR 9.44 more to address complications that may arise. Complications (mortality, early reoperation, cerebrovascular insult, pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation, AV block, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, wound infection) were less frequent in the MI-AVR, making MI-AVR more economically justified than C-AVR (18% vs. 22.1%). © 2023 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Calcifications in Overweight or Obese Persons with Prediabetes: Can They Predict T2 Diabetes and Coronary Vascular Events?(2023) ;Marjanovic Petkovic, Milica (57191966320) ;Vuksanovic, Miljanka (57214054574) ;Sagic, Dragan (35549772400) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)Beljic Zivkovic, Teodora (35483138200)Background: It is difficult to predict the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in subjects with prediabetes and obesity. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for coronary artery calcifications (CACs) and the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary vascular events (CVEs) after 7 years in 100 overweight or obese persons with prediabetes, according to the baseline coronary artery calcium score (CACS). Methods: Lipids, HbA1c, uric acid, and creatinine were assessed. Glucose, insulin, and c-peptide were determined during an oral glucose tolerance test. Multi-sliced computerized tomography with evaluation of CACS was performed. After 7 years, the subjects were assessed for T2D/CVE. Results: CACs were present in 59 subjects. No single biochemical marker could predict presence of a CAC. After 7 years, T2D developed in 55 subjects (61.8% initially had both IFG and IGT). A gain in weight was the only contributing factor for T2D. Nineteen subjects developed a CVE; increased initial clustering of HOMA-IR > 1.9, LDL > 2.6, and mmol/Land TGL > 1.7 mmol/L and higher CACS were present in that group. Conclusions: No risk factors for CACs could be identified. A gain in weight is associated with T2D development, as are higher CACS and clustering of high LDL+TGL+HOMA-IR with CVEs. © 2023 by the authors. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Validation of online version of asthma control questionnaire in pediatric patients(2023) ;Jovicic, Nevena (57204552756) ;Petrovic, Masa (57219857642) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Lazovic, Biljana (36647776000)Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)Introduction: The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a seven-item questionnaire assessing symptoms that asthma clinicians consider to be most important for evaluating the adequacy of asthma control. An online version of the ACQ may be able to indicate whether a visit to the physician is warranted to modify therapy to achieve better control of their asthma, ultimately reducing the number of unnecessary visits, particularly during the pandemic. The aim of our study is to compare the paper and online ACQ to validate the online version for use in real-life settings. Methods: Our study included 28 patients who completed both paper and the online ACQ on the same day when they came home. The online version of the questionnaire was prepared to look similar to the paper form, with the same sentences and answers. Results: The correlation between paper and online ACQ questionnaires was very high (r = 0.935; p < 0.001). When comparing each individual item, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.672 to 0.935. The lowest correlation is obtained in activity limitations, while the next one is 0.767, others higher than 0.8. The online form gave small and insignificantly higher scores compared to paper form with mean difference between −0.07 and 0.21. Mean difference of 0.01 (p = 0.986) between paper ACQ and online ACQ is obtained. Conclusion: The online version of the ACQ can be used for asthma control monitoring in pediatric patients in order to minimize unnecessary social contacts as well as hospital patient load, but retain adequate surveillance of disease symptoms by their physician. © 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Validation of the Serbian version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence/Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12)(2022) ;Nale, Djordje (23498496700) ;Skoric, Violeta (57803622100) ;Nale, Petar (57803622200) ;Babic, Uros (57189327647) ;Petrovic, Masa (57219857642) ;Radovic, Ivana (58359642200) ;Markovic, Jovan (57803622300)Soldatovic, Ivan (35389846900)Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly decrease quality of life and sexual health. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of a Serbian adaptation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12) used in assessing sexual function in women with UI and/or POP. Methods: This study included 416 women, 310 (74.5%) with UI and/or POP and 106 (25.5%) without UI and/or POP. The adaptation of the PISQ-12 to Serbian language was performed via back-translation. The content validity of the questionnaire was conducted by experts in the field. The reliability and validity of the PISQ-12 were analyzed. Evaluation of the data was performed using Content Validity Index (CVI), Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability, item total correlation and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Content validity of the Serbian PISQ-12 was 1.00 (100%). Item total correlations were between 0.459 and 0.819 (P < 0.001). The PISQ-12 had an adequate and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.806) as well as high test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.807; P < 0.001). Factor analysis results revealed strong construct validity. The mean scores of PISQ-12 were significantly better in the control group compared with the women with UI and/or POP. Sexual function was negatively affected by UI and/or POP as assessed with SF-36 and I-QoL questionnaires. Conclusions: This study showed that the Serbian version of the PISQ-12 is a reliable, consistent, valid and condition-specific instrument to assess sexual function in women with UI and/or POP. © 2022, The International Urogynecological Association.
