Browsing by Author "Petrovic, Milovan (16234216100)"

BACKGROUND: Current evidence on the long-term outcome and its determinants in patients with unprotected left main trifurcation (LMT) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is based on small-sized studies. We aimed to assess the clinical, anatomical and procedural factors impacting long-term clinical outcomes of patients with LMT treated by PCI. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on consecutive patients with unprotected LMT in stable or acute coronary settings who underwent PCI with drug-eluting-stent implantation. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. LMT lesions complexity was graded according to a modified Medina LMT score, which, together with standard criteria of >50% stenosis in any of the branches, included the presence of disease extent >5 mm in the two major side-branches. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were analyzed, mean age 67.5 years, 37.9% with diabetes mellitus, 47.6% presenting with acute coronary syndrome, 8.7% in cardiogenic shock, with a mean SYNTAX Score of 28.1. Procedural success (angiographic success without in-hospital MACE) was achieved in 99 patients (96.1%). During 3-year follow-up, 18 patients (17.9%) experienced MACE, mainly due to target lesion revascularization (TLR), which occurred in 12 patients (11.9%). At multivariable analysis, modified Medina LMT score was the only independent predictor of MACE (HR 1.538 [1.081-2.189], P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: PCI in patients with LMT is associated with a high procedural success rate and acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. Baseline LMT lesion complexity, assessed by an original modified Medina LMT score, is an independent driver of long-term clinical outcomes. © 2024 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-traumatic, non-atherosclerotic layering of the coronary artery wall due to the presence of a subintimal hematoma or an intimal tear with the creation of a false lumen that compresses the true lumen and restricts or obstructs the flow. Patients with SCAD and preserved coronary flow are treated conservatively according to the general recommendations. However, percutaneous coronary intervention should be considered in patients with artery occlusion and/or refractory ischemia. Stenting is associated with increased risks comprising stenting in the false lumen, in-stent thrombosis, and/or stent malappositon as well as antegrade or retrograde propagation of the intramural hematoma. Intracoronary imaging is of great value both for the diagnosis and treatment of SCAD. There is rising scrutiny on the use of cutting balloons in acute coronary syndrome caused by SCAD. The idea of using cutting balloons is to fenestrate the intima and drain the intramural hematoma. Our review presents an analysis of 17 published cases of cutting balloon (CB) use in SCAD. What is encouraging is that of the 12 published cases, in 11 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was established with this technique, and TIMI 2 flow in one, without subsequent stent implantation. Four patients received a stent after the CB use, while one patient underwent CB angioplasty after hematoma propagation caused by stent implantation. In all cases, patients were asymptomatic at follow-up, with TIMI 3 flow. © 2023 The Author(s).