Browsing by Author "Petković, S. (7005164142)"

Objective: The aim of our study was to review our experience with Paget's disease of the vulvar relative to initial examination, treatment and oncological outcome. Methods: Ten women with extramammary Paget's diseases of the vulva were treated during the 10-year period. The charts of these patients were reviewed and data were collected regarding patient demographics, symptoms, previous Paget's disease, surgical treatments and time to recurrence. Results: Eight women (80%) were treated with wide local excision or partial vulvectomy, and two patients (20%) required radical resection for invasive adenocarcinoma. The group of women who had invasive diseases also underwent inquinofemoral lymphadenectomy and no lymphatic métastases were noted. Three women (30%) experienced recurrence. The mean time to relapse was 30 months (range 3-88 months). Conclusion: Recurrence is very common and long-term monitoring is recommended with careful examination of any abnormal vulvar lesion.

Introduction: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is present in 10.6% patients after operative treatment for ovarian malignancy. We undertook the present study to find the risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgical treatment for ovarian cancer and to clarify the prognostic value of D-dimer and a positive PTP test (Wells score) in these patients. Material and Methods: A total of 31 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer after surgery, clinically suspicious for DVT were followed from January 2006 to December 2008. All patients were operatively treated at the Clinical Center of Serbia. Study variables included age, cardiovascular disease, FIGO stage, histology, BMI, presence of massive ascites and tumor size, D-dimer level and Wells score. All patients were postoperatively administered anticoagulant therapy. Results: DVT was found in nine of 31 patients (29.0%). High BMI and presence of massive ascites were significantly associated with DVT D-dimer (DD) levels were high in 27 of out 31 patients (87.1%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100, 18.2, 33.3 and 100%. Results of the PTP test (according to Wells score) was positive in 20 out of 31 patients (64.5%). PTP score was not significantly different in patients with or without VTE (p = 0.606). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 66.7, 36.4, 30.0 and 72.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Incidence of VTE after gynecological operations for ovarian cancer in our study was similar to other investigators. Obesity and the massive ascites are statistically significant risk factors. Measurement of DD level and ultrasonography could become the standard in predicting VTE in ovarian cancer surgery. The use of Wells score is not satisfying in these patients. Prediction of VTE after gynecological surgery needs further confirmation in randomized controlled trials.

A 30-year-old women was admitted to the Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia in April 2004 with the following diagnosis: adnexal mass soon after in vitro fertilization. Her history revealed salpingo-oophorectomy for mucinous cystadenofibroma of the left ovary eight years before and cystectomy of the right ovary three years before. At admission, the most remarkable findings were high temperature and elevated white blood cells with erythrocyte sedimentation rate. After the antibiotic treatment, laparatomy was performed and a multilocular right adnexal tumor was found. The right salpingo-oophorectomy was performed and pathological diagnosis was mucinous ovarian adenocarcinoma. Two weeks later, radical surgery was carried out and chemotherapy was applied. There is an urgent need for clear interpretation of the link between ovarian stimulation and ovarian cancer. An association between ovarian stimulation treatment and ovarian cancer has still not been completely proven.