Browsing by Author "Perunicic-Jovanovic, Maja (57210906777)"

Primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PT-DLBCL) represents a rare and aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) with some specific features that differ from other NHLs. Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded (FFPE) samples of 21 PT-DLBCLs and 30 comparative patients with DLBCL were analysed. All PT-DLBCL patients were treated with rituximab-containing regimens, intrathecal prophylaxis (10 patients), and irradiation of the contralateral testis (9 patients). FFPE samples were additionally analysed by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2, c-Myc protein expression) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) (BCL2 and MYC). The patients with PT-DLBCL (median age 48.5 years), had low frequency of B symptoms (28.6%) and were often diagnosed in I and II Ann Arbor clinical stage (66.0%). The majority of PT-DLBCL (80.9%) had a non-germinal centre B-cell-like immunophenotype. Immunohistochemical staining showed increased c-Myc protein expression in the PT-DLBCL group compared to the control group (p = 0.016). MYC rearrangement was detected in 1 of 14 (7.0%), and MYC amplification in 3 of 14 (21.0%) patients. One of the 14 cases (7.0%) in the PT DLBCL group showed BCL2 rearrangement, and four of 14 (28.05%) cases showed BCL2 amplification. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 75.0% of PT-DLBCL patients who had superior survival compared to those who did not achieve CR (median 48 vs. 21 months, p = 0.012). Patients with PT-DLBCL express some immunohistochemical, biological, and clinical features that might differentiate them from nodal and extranodal DLBCL patients, indicating the need for a more personalised treatment approach. © 2018, Termedia Publishing House Ltd. All rights reserved.

The widely used current International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is based on clinical parameters. The objective of this study was to identify additional prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis, which could have an impact on the future treatment of patients with PMF. We conducted a study of 131 consecutive PMF patients with median follow-up of 44 months. Data on baseline demographics, clinical and laboratory parameters, IPSS, grade of bone marrow fibrosis (MF), as well as influence of concomitant comorbidities were analyzed in terms of survival. Comorbidity was assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) score and the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index. An improved prognostic model of survival was obtained by deploying the MF and ACE-27 to the IPSS. A multivariable regression analyses confirmed the statistical significance of IPSS (P < 0.001, HR 3.754, 95 % CI 2.130-6.615), MF > 1 (P = 0.001, HR 2.694, 95 % CI 1.466-4.951) and ACE-27 (P < 0.001, HR 4.141, 95 % CI 2.322-7.386) in predicting the survival of patients with PMF. When the IPSS was modified with MF and ACE-27, the final prognostic model for overall survival was stratified as low (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3) and high risk (score 4-6) with median survival of not reached, 115 and 22 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Our findings indicate that the combination of histological changes, comorbidity assessment and clinical parameters at the time of diagnosis allows better discrimination of patients in survival prognostic groups and helps to identify high-risk patients for a poor outcome. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

The widely used current International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is based on clinical parameters. The objective of this study was to identify additional prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis, which could have an impact on the future treatment of patients with PMF. We conducted a study of 131 consecutive PMF patients with median follow-up of 44 months. Data on baseline demographics, clinical and laboratory parameters, IPSS, grade of bone marrow fibrosis (MF), as well as influence of concomitant comorbidities were analyzed in terms of survival. Comorbidity was assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) score and the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index. An improved prognostic model of survival was obtained by deploying the MF and ACE-27 to the IPSS. A multivariable regression analyses confirmed the statistical significance of IPSS (P < 0.001, HR 3.754, 95 % CI 2.130-6.615), MF > 1 (P = 0.001, HR 2.694, 95 % CI 1.466-4.951) and ACE-27 (P < 0.001, HR 4.141, 95 % CI 2.322-7.386) in predicting the survival of patients with PMF. When the IPSS was modified with MF and ACE-27, the final prognostic model for overall survival was stratified as low (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3) and high risk (score 4-6) with median survival of not reached, 115 and 22 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Our findings indicate that the combination of histological changes, comorbidity assessment and clinical parameters at the time of diagnosis allows better discrimination of patients in survival prognostic groups and helps to identify high-risk patients for a poor outcome. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Purpose: The aim of this 10-year retrospective study was to investigate prognostic clinical and laboratory factors significant for the outcome of patients with mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Methods: The study involved 87 patients diagnosed with MALT lymphoma: 37 (42.5%) with gastrointestinal (GI) and 50 (57.5%) with non-GI localization. The following pretreatment laboratory parameters were analyzed: hempglobin, serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, beta2-microglobulin (β;2-M) and bacteriological (H.pylori) status. Estimated clinical features were: stage of disease, ECOG performance status (PS), tumor mass, number of extranodal localizations, presence of B symptomatology, splenomegaly and enlarged lymph nodes. Diagnosis of MALT lymphoma was based on histopathological analysis of tissue samples, obtained by endoscopy or surgery. Results: The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 36 months and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 64%. OS rate of patients with non-GI localization was higher compared with patients with GI localization (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed hypoalbuminemia to be the most significant parameter associated with poor OS (p<0.001) for both patient groups. The most significant prognostic factor for poor OS in patients with GI localization was LDH level (p=0.031), while hypoalbuminemia was the most significant prognostic factor for poor OS in the group with non-GI disease localization (p=0.001). Conclusion: Proper therapeutic approach for MALT lymphoma patients could be planned taking into consideration poor prognostic parameters, i.e. hypoalbuminemia and elevated LDH for GI patients and hypoalbuminemia for nonGI lymphoma patients.

Purpose: The aim of this 10-year retrospective study was to investigate prognostic clinical and laboratory factors significant for the outcome of patients with mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Methods: The study involved 87 patients diagnosed with MALT lymphoma: 37 (42.5%) with gastrointestinal (GI) and 50 (57.5%) with non-GI localization. The following pretreatment laboratory parameters were analyzed: hempglobin, serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, beta2-microglobulin (β;2-M) and bacteriological (H.pylori) status. Estimated clinical features were: stage of disease, ECOG performance status (PS), tumor mass, number of extranodal localizations, presence of B symptomatology, splenomegaly and enlarged lymph nodes. Diagnosis of MALT lymphoma was based on histopathological analysis of tissue samples, obtained by endoscopy or surgery. Results: The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 36 months and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 64%. OS rate of patients with non-GI localization was higher compared with patients with GI localization (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed hypoalbuminemia to be the most significant parameter associated with poor OS (p<0.001) for both patient groups. The most significant prognostic factor for poor OS in patients with GI localization was LDH level (p=0.031), while hypoalbuminemia was the most significant prognostic factor for poor OS in the group with non-GI disease localization (p=0.001). Conclusion: Proper therapeutic approach for MALT lymphoma patients could be planned taking into consideration poor prognostic parameters, i.e. hypoalbuminemia and elevated LDH for GI patients and hypoalbuminemia for nonGI lymphoma patients.