Browsing by Author "Perros, Petros (7006707944)"

Objective: Information on the impact of SARS-COV-2 on the daily life of thyroid patients during lockdown is sparse. The main objective was explorative, focusing on how SARS-COV-2 affected thyroid patients. Design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, using an online platform. Patients: Patients >18 years with a history of thyroid disease. Measurements: Demographic data, psychological impact of SARS-COV-2, medical care during the pandemic. Results: Valid responses were received from 609 responders. The median age was 50 years, 94% were female and 98.5% were UK residents. The commonest diagnosis was primary hypothyroidism (52.2%). Negative psychological effects following the lockdown were reported by 45.6%–58.7%. Cancellations of appointments with thyroid specialists were reported by 43.8%, although cancellations of thyroid investigations and treatments were relatively infrequent (12.9%–14.1%). Overall satisfaction rates for thyroid services were low (satisfaction score 40.1–42.8 out of 100), but nearly 80% were satisfied with remote consultations. Responder ratings of online information sources about SARS-COV-2 and thyroid diseases were lowest for government sites. Unmet needs during lockdown were: more remote access to thyroid specialists, more online information in ‘plain English’, and psychological support. In multivariate analyses, younger age, female gender, history of depression, hyperthyroidism, not having contracted SARS-COV-2 and multiple comorbidities were risk factors for a negative psychological impact of lockdown. Conclusions: This survey identified a significant negative impact of SARS-COV-2 and lockdown on psychological wellbeing, particularly in some groups of patients defined by demographic factors, history of hyperthyroidism and comorbidities. Low satisfaction with healthcare services among thyroid patients was noted, but remote consultations were rated favourably. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Objective: Information on the impact of SARS-COV-2 on the daily life of thyroid patients during lockdown is sparse. The main objective was explorative, focusing on how SARS-COV-2 affected thyroid patients. Design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, using an online platform. Patients: Patients >18 years with a history of thyroid disease. Measurements: Demographic data, psychological impact of SARS-COV-2, medical care during the pandemic. Results: Valid responses were received from 609 responders. The median age was 50 years, 94% were female and 98.5% were UK residents. The commonest diagnosis was primary hypothyroidism (52.2%). Negative psychological effects following the lockdown were reported by 45.6%–58.7%. Cancellations of appointments with thyroid specialists were reported by 43.8%, although cancellations of thyroid investigations and treatments were relatively infrequent (12.9%–14.1%). Overall satisfaction rates for thyroid services were low (satisfaction score 40.1–42.8 out of 100), but nearly 80% were satisfied with remote consultations. Responder ratings of online information sources about SARS-COV-2 and thyroid diseases were lowest for government sites. Unmet needs during lockdown were: more remote access to thyroid specialists, more online information in ‘plain English’, and psychological support. In multivariate analyses, younger age, female gender, history of depression, hyperthyroidism, not having contracted SARS-COV-2 and multiple comorbidities were risk factors for a negative psychological impact of lockdown. Conclusions: This survey identified a significant negative impact of SARS-COV-2 and lockdown on psychological wellbeing, particularly in some groups of patients defined by demographic factors, history of hyperthyroidism and comorbidities. Low satisfaction with healthcare services among thyroid patients was noted, but remote consultations were rated favourably. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PURPOSE: Thyroid eye disease (TED) can be difficult to manage. The range of available treatments is expanding rapidly; however, cost is a concern and some patients do not respond. The Clinical Activity Score (CAS) was devised as a measure of disease activity and a potential predictor of response to anti-inflammatory treatment. Despite the widespread use of the CAS, inter-observer variability has not been investigated. The aim of the study was to determine the inter-observer variability of the CAS in patients with TED. DESIGN: Prospective reliability analysis. METHODS: Nine patients with a spectrum of clinical features of TED were assessed by 6 experienced observers on the same day. Agreement among the observers was analyzed using the Krippendorff alpha. RESULTS: The Krippendorff alpha for the total CAS was 0.532 (95% CI = 0.199-0.665), whereas alpha values for the individual components of the CAS varied between 0.171 (CI = 0.000-0.334) for lid redness and 0.671 (CI = 0.294-1.000) for spontaneous pain. Assuming that a CAS value ≥3 implies suitability of the patient for anti-inflammatory treatment, the calculated Krippendorff alpha for agreement among assessors on whether treatment should be given or not given was 0.332 (95% CI = 0.0011-0.5862). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown unreliable inter-observer variability in total CAS and most individual CAS components, thus highlighting the need for improving the performance of the CAS or seeking other methods to assess activity. © 2023

Objective: Dissatisfaction with treatment and impaired quality of life (QOL) are reported among people with treated hypothyroidism. We aimed to gain insight into this. Design and patients: We conducted an online survey of individuals with self-reported hypothyroidism. Results: Nine hundred sixty-nine responses were analysed. Dissatisfaction with treatment was common (77.6%), and overall QOL scores were low. Patient satisfaction did not correlate with type of thyroid hormone treatment, but treatment with combination levothyroxine (L-T4) and liothyronine (L-T3) or with desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) was associated with significantly better reported QOL than L-T4 or L-T3 monotherapies (P <.001); however, multivariate analysis inclusive of other clinical parameters failed to confirm an association between type of thyroid hormone treatment and QOL or satisfaction. Multivariate analysis showed positive correlations between satisfaction and age (P =.026), male gender (P =.011), being under the care of a thyroid specialist (P <.001), family doctor (GP) prescribing DTE or L-T4 + L-T3 or L-T3 (P <.001) and being well informed about hypothyroidism (P <.001); negative correlations were observed between satisfaction and negative experiences with L-T4 (P <.001) and expectations for more support from the GP (P <.001), for L-T4 to resolve all symptoms (P =.004), and to be referred to a thyroid specialist (P <.001). For QOL, positive correlations were with male gender (P =.011) and duration of hypothyroidism (P =.002); negative correlations were with age (P =.027), visiting the GP more than 3 times before diagnosis (P <.001), sourcing DTE or L-T3 independently (P =.014), negative experiences with L-T4 (P =.013), having expectations for L-T4 to resolve all symptoms (P <.001) and of more support from the GP (P =.006). Conclusions: Multiple parameters including prior healthcare experiences and expectations influence satisfaction with hypothyroidism treatment and QOL. Focusing on enhancing the patient experience and clarifying expectations at diagnosis may improve satisfaction and QOL. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Objective: Dissatisfaction with treatment and impaired quality of life (QOL) are reported among people with treated hypothyroidism. We aimed to gain insight into this. Design and patients: We conducted an online survey of individuals with self-reported hypothyroidism. Results: Nine hundred sixty-nine responses were analysed. Dissatisfaction with treatment was common (77.6%), and overall QOL scores were low. Patient satisfaction did not correlate with type of thyroid hormone treatment, but treatment with combination levothyroxine (L-T4) and liothyronine (L-T3) or with desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) was associated with significantly better reported QOL than L-T4 or L-T3 monotherapies (P <.001); however, multivariate analysis inclusive of other clinical parameters failed to confirm an association between type of thyroid hormone treatment and QOL or satisfaction. Multivariate analysis showed positive correlations between satisfaction and age (P =.026), male gender (P =.011), being under the care of a thyroid specialist (P <.001), family doctor (GP) prescribing DTE or L-T4 + L-T3 or L-T3 (P <.001) and being well informed about hypothyroidism (P <.001); negative correlations were observed between satisfaction and negative experiences with L-T4 (P <.001) and expectations for more support from the GP (P <.001), for L-T4 to resolve all symptoms (P =.004), and to be referred to a thyroid specialist (P <.001). For QOL, positive correlations were with male gender (P =.011) and duration of hypothyroidism (P =.002); negative correlations were with age (P =.027), visiting the GP more than 3 times before diagnosis (P <.001), sourcing DTE or L-T3 independently (P =.014), negative experiences with L-T4 (P =.013), having expectations for L-T4 to resolve all symptoms (P <.001) and of more support from the GP (P =.006). Conclusions: Multiple parameters including prior healthcare experiences and expectations influence satisfaction with hypothyroidism treatment and QOL. Focusing on enhancing the patient experience and clarifying expectations at diagnosis may improve satisfaction and QOL. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Background: Hypothyroidism is common, however, aspects of its treatment remain controversial. Our survey aimed at documenting treatment choices of European thyroid specialists and exploring how patients' persistent symptoms, clinician demographics, and geo-economic factors relate to treatment choices. Methods: Seventeen thousand two hundred forty-seven thyroid specialists from 28 countries were invited to participate in an online questionnaire survey. The survey included respondent demographic data and treatment choices for hypothyroid patients with persistent symptoms. Geo-economic data for each country were included in the analyses. Results: The response rate was 32.9% (6058 respondents out of 17,247 invitees). Levothyroxine (LT4) was the initial treatment preferred by the majority (98.3%). Persistent symptoms despite normal serum thyrotropin (TSH) while receiving LT4 treatment were reported to affect up to 10.0% of patients by 75.4% of respondents, while 28.4% reported an increasing such trend in the past 5 years. The principal explanations offered for patients' persistent symptoms were psychosocial factors (77.1%), comorbidities (69.2%), and unrealistic patient expectations (61.0%). Combination treatment with LT4+liothyronine (LT3) was chosen by 40.0% of respondents for patients who complained of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH. This option was selected more frequently by female thyroid specialists, with high-volume practice, working in countries with high gross national income per capita. Conclusions: The perception of patients' dissatisfaction reported by physicians seems lower than that described by hypothyroid patients in previous surveys. LT4+LT3 treatment is used frequently by thyroid specialists in Europe for persistent hypothyroid-like symptoms even if they generally attribute such symptoms to nonendocrine causes and despite the evidence of nonsuperiority of the combined over the LT4 therapy. Pressure by dissatisfied patients on their physicians for LT3-containing treatments is a likely explanation. The association of the therapeutic choices with the clinician demographic characteristics and geo-economic factors in Europe is a novel information and requires further investigation. Copyright 2024, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Background: Hypothyroidism is common, however, aspects of its treatment remain controversial. Our survey aimed at documenting treatment choices of European thyroid specialists and exploring how patients' persistent symptoms, clinician demographics, and geo-economic factors relate to treatment choices. Methods: Seventeen thousand two hundred forty-seven thyroid specialists from 28 countries were invited to participate in an online questionnaire survey. The survey included respondent demographic data and treatment choices for hypothyroid patients with persistent symptoms. Geo-economic data for each country were included in the analyses. Results: The response rate was 32.9% (6058 respondents out of 17,247 invitees). Levothyroxine (LT4) was the initial treatment preferred by the majority (98.3%). Persistent symptoms despite normal serum thyrotropin (TSH) while receiving LT4 treatment were reported to affect up to 10.0% of patients by 75.4% of respondents, while 28.4% reported an increasing such trend in the past 5 years. The principal explanations offered for patients' persistent symptoms were psychosocial factors (77.1%), comorbidities (69.2%), and unrealistic patient expectations (61.0%). Combination treatment with LT4+liothyronine (LT3) was chosen by 40.0% of respondents for patients who complained of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH. This option was selected more frequently by female thyroid specialists, with high-volume practice, working in countries with high gross national income per capita. Conclusions: The perception of patients' dissatisfaction reported by physicians seems lower than that described by hypothyroid patients in previous surveys. LT4+LT3 treatment is used frequently by thyroid specialists in Europe for persistent hypothyroid-like symptoms even if they generally attribute such symptoms to nonendocrine causes and despite the evidence of nonsuperiority of the combined over the LT4 therapy. Pressure by dissatisfied patients on their physicians for LT3-containing treatments is a likely explanation. The association of the therapeutic choices with the clinician demographic characteristics and geo-economic factors in Europe is a novel information and requires further investigation. Copyright 2024, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Objective: To construct a predictive score for the development or progression of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) in Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH). Design: Prospective observational study in patients with newly diagnosed GH, treated with antithyroid drugs (ATD) for 18 months at ten participating centers from EUGOGO in 8 European countries. Methods: 348 patients were included with untreated GH but without obvious GO. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors. A predictive score (called PREDIGO) was constructed. Results: GO occurred in 15% (mild in 13% and moderate to severe in 2%), predominantly at 6-12 months after start of ATD. Independent baseline determinants for the development of GO were clinical activity score (assigned 5 points if score > 0), TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (2 points if TBII 2-10 U/L, 5 points if TBII > 10 U/L), duration of hyperthyroid symptoms (1 point if 1-4 months, 3 points if >4 months) and smoking (2 points if current smoker). Based on the odds ratio of each of these four determinants, a quantitative predictive score (called PREDIGO) was constructed ranging from 0 to 15 with higher scores denoting higher risk; positive and negative predictive values were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.37) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) respectively. Conclusions: In patients without GO at diagnosis, 15% will develop GO (13% mild, 2% moderate to severe) during subsequent treatment with ATD for 18 months. A predictive score called PREDIGO composed of four baseline determinants was better in predicting those patients who will not develop obvious GO than who will. © 2018 BioScientifica Ltd. All rights reserved.

Objective: To construct a predictive score for the development or progression of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) in Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH). Design: Prospective observational study in patients with newly diagnosed GH, treated with antithyroid drugs (ATD) for 18 months at ten participating centers from EUGOGO in 8 European countries. Methods: 348 patients were included with untreated GH but without obvious GO. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors. A predictive score (called PREDIGO) was constructed. Results: GO occurred in 15% (mild in 13% and moderate to severe in 2%), predominantly at 6-12 months after start of ATD. Independent baseline determinants for the development of GO were clinical activity score (assigned 5 points if score > 0), TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (2 points if TBII 2-10 U/L, 5 points if TBII > 10 U/L), duration of hyperthyroid symptoms (1 point if 1-4 months, 3 points if >4 months) and smoking (2 points if current smoker). Based on the odds ratio of each of these four determinants, a quantitative predictive score (called PREDIGO) was constructed ranging from 0 to 15 with higher scores denoting higher risk; positive and negative predictive values were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.37) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) respectively. Conclusions: In patients without GO at diagnosis, 15% will develop GO (13% mild, 2% moderate to severe) during subsequent treatment with ATD for 18 months. A predictive score called PREDIGO composed of four baseline determinants was better in predicting those patients who will not develop obvious GO than who will. © 2018 BioScientifica Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background/aims The epidemiology of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) may be changing. The aim of the study was to identify trends in presentation of GO to tertiary centres and initial management over time. Methods Prospective observational study of European Group On Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) centres. All new referrals with a diagnosis of GO over a 4-month period in 2012 were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics, referral timelines and initial decisions about management were recorded. The data were compared with a similar EUGOGO survey performed in 2000. Results The demographic characteristics of 269 patients studied in 2012 were similar to those collected in the year 2000, including smoking rates (40.0% vs 40.2%). Mild (60.5% vs 41.2%, p<0.01) and inactive GO (63.2% vs 39.9%, p<0.01) were more prevalent in 2012. The times from diagnosis of thyroid disease to being seen in EUGOGO centres (6 vs 16 months) and from first symptoms of GO (9 vs 16 months) or from diagnosis of GO (6 vs 12 months) to first consultation in EUGOGO centres were shorter in 2012 ( p<0.01). The initial management plans for GO were no different except surgical treatments for patients with mild inactive disease were more frequently offered in the 2012 cohort than in 2000 (27.3% vs 17%, p<0.05), and selenium supplements were offered only in the 2012 cohort (21.2% vs 0%, p<0.01). Conclusions These findings suggest that the clinical manifestations of patients with GO may be changing over time in Europe.

Background/aims The epidemiology of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) may be changing. The aim of the study was to identify trends in presentation of GO to tertiary centres and initial management over time. Methods Prospective observational study of European Group On Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) centres. All new referrals with a diagnosis of GO over a 4-month period in 2012 were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics, referral timelines and initial decisions about management were recorded. The data were compared with a similar EUGOGO survey performed in 2000. Results The demographic characteristics of 269 patients studied in 2012 were similar to those collected in the year 2000, including smoking rates (40.0% vs 40.2%). Mild (60.5% vs 41.2%, p<0.01) and inactive GO (63.2% vs 39.9%, p<0.01) were more prevalent in 2012. The times from diagnosis of thyroid disease to being seen in EUGOGO centres (6 vs 16 months) and from first symptoms of GO (9 vs 16 months) or from diagnosis of GO (6 vs 12 months) to first consultation in EUGOGO centres were shorter in 2012 ( p<0.01). The initial management plans for GO were no different except surgical treatments for patients with mild inactive disease were more frequently offered in the 2012 cohort than in 2000 (27.3% vs 17%, p<0.05), and selenium supplements were offered only in the 2012 cohort (21.2% vs 0%, p<0.01). Conclusions These findings suggest that the clinical manifestations of patients with GO may be changing over time in Europe.

Background: Treatment of simple goiter (SG) growing over time with thyroid hormone (TH) therapy is discouraged by international guidelines. Purpose: To ascertain views of European thyroid specialists about TH treatment for euthyroid patients with growing SG and explore associations with management choice. Methods: Online survey on the use of TH for growing SG among thyroid experts from 28 European countries. Results: The response rate was 31.5% (5430/17,247). Most respondents were endocrinologists. Twenty-eight percent asserted that TH therapy may be indicated in euthyroid patients with a growing SG. National and regional differences were noted, from 7% of positive responses in The Netherlands to 78% in Czech Republic (p < 0.0001). TH was more frequently prescribed by respondents over 40 years old (OR 1.77, 2.13, 2.41 if 41–50, 51–60, >60, respectively), and working in areas of former iodine insufficiency (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.50). TH was less frequently prescribed by endocrinologists (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94) and respondents working in Southern Europe (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33–0.48), Northern Europe (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.22–0.36) and Western Asia (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.11–0.24) compared to Western Europe. Associations with respondents’ sex, country, availability of national thyroid guidelines, and gross national income per capita were absent or weak. Conclusions: Almost a third of European thyroid specialists support treating SG with TH, contrary to current guidelines and recommendations. This calls for urgent attention. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.

Background: Treatment of simple goiter (SG) growing over time with thyroid hormone (TH) therapy is discouraged by international guidelines. Purpose: To ascertain views of European thyroid specialists about TH treatment for euthyroid patients with growing SG and explore associations with management choice. Methods: Online survey on the use of TH for growing SG among thyroid experts from 28 European countries. Results: The response rate was 31.5% (5430/17,247). Most respondents were endocrinologists. Twenty-eight percent asserted that TH therapy may be indicated in euthyroid patients with a growing SG. National and regional differences were noted, from 7% of positive responses in The Netherlands to 78% in Czech Republic (p < 0.0001). TH was more frequently prescribed by respondents over 40 years old (OR 1.77, 2.13, 2.41 if 41–50, 51–60, >60, respectively), and working in areas of former iodine insufficiency (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.50). TH was less frequently prescribed by endocrinologists (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94) and respondents working in Southern Europe (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33–0.48), Northern Europe (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.22–0.36) and Western Asia (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.11–0.24) compared to Western Europe. Associations with respondents’ sex, country, availability of national thyroid guidelines, and gross national income per capita were absent or weak. Conclusions: Almost a third of European thyroid specialists support treating SG with TH, contrary to current guidelines and recommendations. This calls for urgent attention. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.

Objectives: The use of levothyroxine (LT4) treatment aiming to improve fertility in euthyroid women with positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) is not supported by the available evidence. The aim of the study was to document the use of LT4 by European thyroid specialists in such patients. Design: The data presented derive from Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists, an International Survey (THESIS), a questionnaire conducted between 2019 and 2021 to document the management of hypothyroidism by European thyroid specialists. Here, we report the aggregate results on the use of LT4 in infertile, euthyroid women with positive TPOAb. Results: A total of 2316/5406 (42.8%) respondents stated that LT4 may be indicated in TPOAb positive euthyroid women with infertility. The proportion of those replying positively to this question varied widely across different countries (median 39.4, range 22.9%–83.7%). In multivariate analyses males (OR: 0.8; CI: 0.7–0.9) and respondents >60 years (OR: 0.7; 0.6–0.8) were the least inclined to consider LT4 for this indication. Conversely, respondents managing many thyroid patients (“weekly” [OR: 1.4; CI: 1.0–1.9], “daily” [OR: 1.8; CI: 1.3–2.4]) and practicing in Eastern Europe (OR: 1.5; CI: 1.3–1.9) were most likely to consider LT4. Conclusions: A remarkably high number of respondents surveyed between 2019 and 2021, would consider LT4 treatment in TPOAb positive euthyroid women with infertility. This view varied widely across countries and correlated with sex, age and workload, potentially influencing patient management. These results raise concerns about potential risks of overtreatment. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Objectives: The use of levothyroxine (LT4) treatment aiming to improve fertility in euthyroid women with positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) is not supported by the available evidence. The aim of the study was to document the use of LT4 by European thyroid specialists in such patients. Design: The data presented derive from Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists, an International Survey (THESIS), a questionnaire conducted between 2019 and 2021 to document the management of hypothyroidism by European thyroid specialists. Here, we report the aggregate results on the use of LT4 in infertile, euthyroid women with positive TPOAb. Results: A total of 2316/5406 (42.8%) respondents stated that LT4 may be indicated in TPOAb positive euthyroid women with infertility. The proportion of those replying positively to this question varied widely across different countries (median 39.4, range 22.9%–83.7%). In multivariate analyses males (OR: 0.8; CI: 0.7–0.9) and respondents >60 years (OR: 0.7; 0.6–0.8) were the least inclined to consider LT4 for this indication. Conversely, respondents managing many thyroid patients (“weekly” [OR: 1.4; CI: 1.0–1.9], “daily” [OR: 1.8; CI: 1.3–2.4]) and practicing in Eastern Europe (OR: 1.5; CI: 1.3–1.9) were most likely to consider LT4. Conclusions: A remarkably high number of respondents surveyed between 2019 and 2021, would consider LT4 treatment in TPOAb positive euthyroid women with infertility. This view varied widely across countries and correlated with sex, age and workload, potentially influencing patient management. These results raise concerns about potential risks of overtreatment. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Introduction/Objective Hypothyroidism is a common disease and treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) is effective. However, variations in management are frequent. The aim of this study was to identify practices and attitudes of Serbian physicians relating to the treatment of hypothyroidism. Methods An anonymized questionnaire was distributed electronically to members of the Serbian Thyroid Society, Serbian Association of Endocrine Surgeons, and Section for Endocrinology of the Serbian Medical Society. Results Out of 170 invitations, 99 responses were received. LT4 was the first choice for the treatment of hypothyroidism in 90% of patients. After starting LT4 replacement therapy most respondents would recheck thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in 4–6 weeks (n = 51, 62%) and in eight weeks (n = 29, 35%). In total, 61% of respondents (n = 60) indicated that they would consider treating euthyroid patients with LT4, the commonest indication being female infertility with high levels of thyroid antibodies (54%, n = 50). More than half respondents (58%, n = 45) would recommend combined LT4 + LT3 therapy for patients on LT4 with normal serum TSH who still complain of symptoms of hypothyroidism. 53% (n = 41/77), reported that the frequency of patients with normal serum TSH who still complain of hypothyroid symptoms is less than 5%. Conclusion LT4 was the first choice of therapy for the treatment of hypothyroid patients, whereas LT3 + LT4 combination treatment is considered in patients with persistent symptoms of hypothyroidism despite normalization of TSH. The most common indication for thyroid hormone treatment in euthyroid patients was female infertility with high levels of thyroid antibodies. Alternative LT4 formulations like liquid solution or soft-gel capsules –formulations presently not available in Serbia, were largely reserved for specific conditions (interfering drugs, malabsorption, inability to take LT4 in the fasting state, unexplained poor biochemical control of hypothyroidism). © 2022, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.