Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Pedersen, Robert Schou (57200904293)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based comparison and validation study of multiple models
    (2023)
    Jelicic, Jelena (56180044800)
    ;
    Juul-Jensen, Karen (57218352166)
    ;
    Bukumiric, Zoran (36600111200)
    ;
    Roost Clausen, Michael (58039350000)
    ;
    Ludvigsen Al-Mashhadi, Ahmed (57189056494)
    ;
    Pedersen, Robert Schou (57200904293)
    ;
    Poulsen, Christian Bjørn (8773152900)
    ;
    Brown, Peter (56437846200)
    ;
    El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer (22634515900)
    ;
    Stauffer Larsen, Thomas (35405235400)
    Currently, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most used and reported model for prognostication in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). IPI-like variations have been proposed, but only a few have been validated in different populations (e.g., revised IPI (R-IPI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI)). We aimed to validate and compare different IPI-like variations to identify the model with the highest predictive accuracy for survival in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. We included 5126 DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy with available data required by 13 different prognostic models. All models could predict survival, but NCCN-IPI consistently provided high levels of accuracy. Moreover, we found similar 5-year overall survivals in the high-risk group (33.4%) compared to the original validation study of NCCN-IPI. Additionally, only one model incorporating albumin performed similarly well but did not outperform NCCN-IPI regarding discrimination (c-index 0.693). Poor fit, discrimination, and calibration were observed in models with only three risk groups and without age as a risk factor. In this extensive retrospective registry-based study comparing 13 prognostic models, we suggest that NCCN-IPI should be reported as the reference model along with IPI in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients until more accurate validated prognostic models for DLBCL become available. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback