Browsing by Author "Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100)"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Adenomyosis and fertility-sparing surgery: A literature appraisal(2024) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Nigdelis, Meletios P. (57202073126) ;Sparic, Radmila (23487159800) ;Morciano, Andrea (36492237600)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)Adenomyosis is an intricate pathological condition that negatively impacts the uterus. It is closely related to the more well-known endometriosis, with which it shares parallels in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and both microscopic and macroscopic features. The purpose of this narrative review is to give a clear univocal definition and outlook on the different, patient-adapted, surgical treatments. MEDLINE and PubMed searches on these topics were conducted from 1990 to 2022 using a mix of selected keywords. Papers and articles were identified and included in this narrative review after authors' revision and evaluation. From the literature analysis, authors reported the following surgical techniques: laparoscopic double/triple-flap method, laparotomic wedge resection of the uterine wall, laparotomic transverse H-incision of the uterine wall, laparotomic wedge-shaped excision, and laparotomic complete debulking excision by asymmetric dissection technique. Each of these techniques has strengths and weaknesses, but the literature data on the pregnancy rate are somewhat limited. The only certain information is the risk of uterine rupture up to 6.0% after surgical treatment for uterine adenomyosis. Over the years, the surgical approach continued to reach a positive result by minimally invasive treatment, with less hospitalization, less postoperative pain, and less blood loss. Over the years, the gynecological surgeon has gained the skills, training and increasingly sophisticated surgical techniques to target effective therapy. That's why a hysterectomy is no longer the only surgical resource to treat adenomyosis, but in patients who wish to preserve the fertility, there is a wide variety of surgical alternatives. © 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Advanced maternal age (AMA) and pregnancy: a feasible but problematic event(2024) ;Sparić, Radmila (23487159800) ;Stojković, Marta (59256285300) ;Plešinac, Jovana (58046514300) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Malvasi, Antonio (15045047100)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)This narrative review aimed to summarize all adverse outcomes of pregnancy in advanced maternal age (AMA) to assess the age of the mother as a potentially crucial risk factor. AMA refers to women older than 35 years. While expectations and the role of women in society have undergone significant changes today, the biology of aging remains unchanged. Various pathologic changes occur in the human body with age, including chronic noncommunicable diseases, as well as notable changes in reproductive organs, that significantly affect fertility. Despite substantial advancements in technology and medicine, pregnancy in AMA remains a formidable challenge. Although there are some advantages to postponing childbirth, they primarily relate to maternal maturity and economic stability. However, regrettably, there are also many adverse aspects of pregnancy at advanced ages. These include complications affecting both the mother and the fetus. Pregnants in AMA were more prone to suffer from gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, and eclampsia during pregnancy compared to younger women. In addition, miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies were more prevalent. Delivery was more frequently completed via cesarean section, and postpartum complications and maternal mortality were also higher. Unfortunately, there were also complications concerning the fetus, such as chromosomal abnormalities, premature birth, low birth weight, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and stillbirth. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Fortifying the foundation: assessing the role of uterine ligament integrity in uterine prolapse and beyond(2024) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Sparic, Radmila (23487159800) ;Morciano, Andrea (36492237600) ;Babovic, Ivana (14828590600) ;Panese, Gaetano (57223092147)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)Background: Pelvic floor stability is influenced by various biomechanical, anatomical, and physiological factors. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and related conditions. Objective: To analyze the key factors affecting pelvic floor integrity and explore both non-surgical and surgical interventions to enhance stability and treatment outcomes. Methods: This review draws from biomechanical research to assess the role of the uterosacral ligament in pelvic support, while also examining the potential of both traditional and emerging therapeutic approaches, including non-surgical interventions like vitamin C supplementation. Results: - The uterosacral ligament demonstrates superior strength and stiffness, making it essential for structural support of pelvic organs. - Non-surgical interventions, such as vitamin C supplementation, show potential in improving ligament integrity and preventing pelvic floor disorders. - Emerging surgical techniques, including tendon-based procedures and injectable fibrous hydrogel composites, offer promising improvements in outcomes for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. - Additional factors such as muscle strength and neural deficiencies contribute to the complexity of pelvic floor biomechanics, indicating the need for multifaceted treatment approaches. Conclusion : This analysis provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and managing pelvic floor stability by integrating biomechanical, physiological, and anatomical insights. The findings highlight the potential for personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes in pelvic floor disorders. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture after delivery: A comprehensive evaluation of the uterine rupture management, with a proposal surgical method(2025) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Licchelli, Martina (57223083139) ;Panese, Gaetano (57223092147) ;Morciano, Andrea (36492237600) ;Sparic, Radmila (23487159800) ;Kosmas, Ioannis (6505812615) ;De Rosa, Filippo (57207770512) ;Malvasi, Antonio (15045047100)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)Uterine rupture constitutes a critical obstetric emergency that presents substantial risks to both the maternal and fetal populations. This investigation evaluated the surgical interventions available for uterine rupture, emphasizing laparoscopic repair subsequent to uterine rupture. Laparoscopic repair serves as a fertility-sustaining alternative to conventional laparotomy, demonstrating comparable operative durations of 80 min (interquartile range [IQR] 60–114) for laparoscopic procedures versus 78 min (IQR 58–114) for laparotomy interventions. Nevertheless, laparoscopic approaches confer significant advantages, including a reduced incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (14.2% vs. 40% for laparotomy), a diminished requirement for blood transfusions (14.2% vs. 60%), and abbreviated hospital stays (median of 3 days vs. 5 days for laparotomy). The investigation explored the contentious discourse surrounding single-layer versus double-layer suturing methodologies, noting that barbed sutures significantly decrease uterine closure times (224 ± 46 vs. 343 ± 75 s for traditional sutures). Single-layer suturing is advocated as sufficient for maintaining uterine integrity in suitably selected cases. The necessity of meticulous postoperative monitoring, particularly concerning the assessment of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, is emphasized, with recurrence rates varying from 4.8% to 19.4%. Finally, authors also proposed a feasible laparoscopic technique to repair a uterine rupture (the “CHEESE” method [closure of hemodynamically stable, early uterine rupture, via endoscopic surgery after spontaneous delivery]), appropriate for hemodynamically stable patients with minor ruptures. This review underscores the progressive role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of uterine rupture and seeks to optimize clinical outcomes for both maternal and neonatal health. © 2025 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Literature review, surgical decision making algorithm, and AGREE II-S comparison of national and international recommendations and guidelines in pelvic organ prolapse surgery(2024) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Morciano, Andrea (36492237600) ;Sparic, Radmila (23487159800)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)The average lifespan has increased over time due to improvements in quality of life, leading to an aging population that stays healthy for longer. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), whether uterine or vaginal, is a problem that severely impairs quality of life and imposes significant restrictions. The present study provides the reader with a summary of the many surgical techniques used in POP surgery, comparing international guidelines, offering an algorithm that is simple to understand, and allows the reader to quickly choose the table that includes the best surgical therapy for each individual. Using relevant keywords, the writers searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant publications from 2000 to April 2023. Studies with cases of oncologic disorders or prior hysterectomy performed for another reason were not included in the analysis. Ten distinct international guidelines are highlighted and examined in the present study. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II-S (AGREE II-S) method to assess their quality, and incorporated the results into the conclusion. Worldwide, anterior colporrhaphy is the preferred method of treating anterior compartment abnormalities, and mesh is virtually always used when recurrence occurs (which happens in about half of the cases). Worldwide, posterior colporrhaphy is commonly used to repair posterior compartment abnormalities. Only a few national guidelines (the Iranian guideline, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [AOGS], and the German-speaking countries) permit the use of mesh or xenograft in cases of recurrence. There is agreement on the abdominal approach (sacrocolpopexy) with mesh for treating apical deformities. Sacrospinous-hysteropexy is the standard method used to guide the vaginal approach; mesh is typically used to aid in this process. There are just three recommendations that do not include vaginal operations: HSE, AOGS, and Iran. Of obliteration techniques, colpocleisis is unquestionably the best. In conclusion, our analysis highlights the significance of customized methods in POP surgery, taking into account the requirements and preferences of each patient. To choose the best surgical therapy, criteria and patient features must be carefully considered. © 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Mastering nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy: Insights, guidelines evaluation, and point-by-point discussion(2025) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100) ;Sparic, Radmila (23487159800) ;Morciano, Andrea (36492237600) ;Constantin, Silviu Mihai (59310837800) ;Babovic, Ivana (14828590600) ;de Rosa, Filippo (57207770512)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)For surgeons and clinicians, nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy has certain difficulties and considerations. In order to aid in decision-making in these situations, this manuscript offers a thorough review of the guidelines currently in place from renowned obstetric and surgical societies, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, and others. Using AGREE II-S methodology, a comprehensive analysis of guidelines reveals differences in recommendations for anesthetics, surgical procedures, imaging modalities, and thromboembolic prophylaxis. Furthermore, a thorough discussion of strategic surgical planning is provided, covering aspects such as patient positioning, trocar placement, pneumoperitoneum generation, and thromboembolic risk management. The publication highlights that in order to maximize the results for both the mother and the fetus after nonobstetric surgery performed during pregnancy, a multidisciplinary approach and evidence-based decision-making are essential. © 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Personalized Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy and Central Nervous System Development: Reflections on the Gold Standard of Fetomaternal Therapy(2024) ;Babović, Ivana R. (14828590600) ;Sparić, Radmila (23487159800) ;Plešinac, Snežana D. (13611805700) ;Belović, Dušica M. Kocijančić (57194538164) ;Plešinac, Jovana D. (58046514300) ;Akšam, Slavica S. (41460951800) ;Plešinac, Vera D. (26432163400) ;Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100)Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)Background: The term “fetal programming” refers to the effects of endogenous and exogenous corticosteroids, whether received from the mother or the fetus, on brain development and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis reset. The authors of this narrative review examine the WHO’s guidelines for prenatal corticosteroids in pregnant women who are at high risk of premature delivery. These guidelines are regarded as the best available for preventing late-life problems resulting from preterm. Methods: In order to find full-text publications published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2023 that were written in English, the authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Results: The authors highlight the possible adverse long-term effects of prenatal corticosteroid medication on human brain development and function. This pharmacological feature is therapeutically significant because there is less evidence in the scientific literature regarding the potential role that the timing, mode, and dosage of exogenous steroid treatment may have in neurological illnesses down the road. Conclusions: The authors expect that these studies will shed light on the relationship between specially designed prenatal corticosteroid therapy and the molecular mechanisms underlying the prenatal programming of neurodevelopment in childhood and adulthood. © 2024 by the authors.