Browsing by Author "Pavlovic-Markovic, Aleksandra (55110483700)"

Background: The increasing incidence of duodenal neoplasm has underlined different methods of resection depending on the clinical presentation, endoscopic features and histopathology. In this comprehensive review, we systematically describe the current knowledge concerning the diagnosis and management of duodenal adenomas (DAs) and discuss data considering all possible therapeutic approaches. Summary: Among a variety of duodenal lesions, including neuroendocrine tumors and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, DAs present precancerous lesions of the duodenal papilla or non-ampullary region necessitating removal. DAs can occur sporadically (SDA) as rare lesions or relatively common in polyposis syndromes. The endoscopic resections of DA are associated with an increased degree of complexity due to distinctive anatomical properties of the duodenal wall, luminal diameter and the presence of ampulla with pancreatic and biliary drainage. The endoscopic techniques including cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and argon plasma coagulation ablation are suggested to be less invasive than surgical treatment, associated with shorter hospital stay and lower cost. According to the current clinical practice, surgery has been accepted as standard therapeutic approach in familial adenomatous polyposis patients with severe polyposis or DA not amenable to endoscopic resection. Key Messages: The strategy for endoscopic resection of DAs depends on the lesion size, morphology, location, and histopathology findings. Small adenomas are most frequently diagnosed and removed by standard CSP techniques, while large laterally spreading lesions and ampullary adenoma are referred for EMR or endoscopic papillectomy respectively. Screening colonoscopy is indicated in patients with SDA. Additional studies for new endoscopic strategies and techniques for curative therapy of DAs are needed to refine future management decisions. Complete resection of DA is considered curative, but nevertheless, long-term endoscopic follow-up is still required to detect and treat any recurrent arising lesions. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Objectives Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of two different screening approaches in a small country (Montenegro, 650 000 inhabitants) with a CRC incidence lower than the European average. Methods Two structured invitation programs were compared with respect to compliance and neoplasia yield: (i) program A focused on first-degree relatives of CRC patients diagnosed in two hospitals (n=206), inviting them for colonoscopy; (ii) program B was an invitation program for fecal occult blood testing, followed by colonoscopy if positive, conducted in University Hospital, Podgorica, Montenegro, on 2760 randomly selected average-risk persons, age 50-74 years, living in a single municipality. Results Of 710 first-degree relatives of 206 CRC patients approached, 540 presented for colonoscopy (76.05% uptake). Overall, 31 were diagnosed with a cancer, 58 with advanced adenoma, and 151 with adenoma in general. In the general screening program, of 2760 individuals invited, 920 underwent fecal immunochemical test (33.3% uptake) and colonoscopy was performed in all 95 positive cases (10.3%); six cancers was found in five patients (one patient had two cancers), 19 patients were diagnosed with advanced adenoma, and 26 with any adenomas. The risk-targeted screening program had a significantly higher yield for cancers in both per invited (31/710 vs. 5/2760, P<0.001) and per eligible person analysis (31/540 vs. 5/920, P<0.001). Conclusion In a low-incidence country with limited resources, it may be advisable to start with CRC screening targeted to risk groups. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Background: Diarrhea is defined as the passage of loose stools and increase in stool frequency, weight, or volume. Diarrhea is an important health issue since it accounts for 2.5 million deaths in the world each year. Summary: Diarrhea can be acute, persistent, or chronic. Acute diarrhea (AD) is usually infectious, caused by viruses, less frequently by bacteria and parasites. The majority of cases of AD are self-limiting and do not require diagnostic workup. The use of diagnostic tests in AD should be limited to patients with signs of severe dehydration, bloody stools, persistent fever and those suffering from immunodeficiencies using immunosuppressive therapy or to cases of suspected nosocomial infection. These patients should be referred to gastroenterologists or infectious disease specialists. Therapy in AD consists of early oral refeeding, antidiarrheal medications, antibiotics, and probiotics. Chronic diarrhea (CD) has diverse etiology. The majority of patients have self-limiting symptoms or functional gastrointestinal disorders. Patients with blood in stool, weight loss, clinical and laboratory signs of anemia, and palpable mass in the abdomen (red flag symptoms) need urgent gastroenterology referral. Therapy in CD is possible when the underlying cause of symptoms is identified. Key Messages: The general practitioner should identify high-risk patients with AD and/or red flag symptoms for urgent gastroenterology referral. © 2021